哈尔滨市行政服务中心公众满意度测评研究
[Abstract]:Since the 1960s and 1970s, in order to solve the problems of inefficiency, high administrative cost, lagging service level and restraining economic development of the traditional regulatory government, western countries have carried out performance reform on government administrative departments. This momentous reform movement is called "new public management" movement. In the process of reform, the common practice is to introduce "enterprise" management, operation mode, and effective means such as market competition mechanism to realize "government reengineering", improve the supply quality of government public goods and public services, and transform government performance, so as to improve public satisfaction and win back the public. In the 1990s, under the impetus of economic globalization, western administrative reform thought developed deeply in our country, and our government began to explore the construction of service-oriented government. Local governments have set up administrative service centers one after another. As a result of the reform of simplifying administrative examination and approval procedures and optimizing the administrative examination and approval system, administrative service centers are a new type of government service institutions. They are not only the service places for the government to benefit the people but also the window for the government to display its image to the public. The public, as the service object of the government, has the most convincing and authoritative evaluation on the service provided by the government. Therefore, we should give full play to the public's main role in the performance evaluation of the administrative service center, and be objective and impartial. In order to enrich the theoretical research system of administrative service centers and promote the development and perfection of administrative service centers in China, this study selects the weak and unsatisfactory public satisfaction evaluation in the theoretical research of administrative service centers. As a research topic, this paper takes the public satisfaction evaluation of Harbin Administrative Service Center as an example to explore and study, aiming at making a contribution to the development of the administrative service center through our own efforts. The actual development of the administrative service center needs to adjust the variables, and AHP is used to construct the quantitative evaluation model of public satisfaction. Then the questionnaire of public satisfaction is designed by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate the satisfaction of Harbin administrative service center. The main ideas of this study are as follows: Firstly, the background, significance and research trends at home and abroad are introduced. On this basis, the basic concepts, characteristics, development process and theoretical basis of the administrative service center are elaborated in detail. Secondly, on the basis of the American customer satisfaction index model, according to the actual situation of Harbin administrative service center to adjust variables, select evaluation indicators to build evaluation index system, and with the help of Yaahp software to reasonably determine the weight of each indicator, build a quantitative evaluation model of public satisfaction. The quantitative evaluation model of public satisfaction is constructed. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to set up a fuzzy comprehensive questionnaire to make an empirical study of Harbin administrative service center. The problems revealed in the evaluation of public satisfaction of Harbin administrative service center are found out and the corresponding countermeasures are put forward. Based on the empirical study of measurement and evaluation, the author finds that the quantitative evaluation model of public satisfaction can clearly and intuitively understand the public satisfaction of administrative service centers and the existing problems, so as to effectively give us concrete and effective countermeasures to promote the development and improvement of administrative service centers. The public satisfaction evaluation of service center is basically feasible, and has many advantages, such as saving time, accurate calculation, convenient operation and so on.
【学位授予单位】:东北农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D630.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈岱琪;孙思浓;王连民;;基于YAAHP软件构建量化社会保障评价指标体系[J];黑龙江科技信息;2016年20期
2 孙婷婷;梁昌勇;朱龙;徐枞巍;;政府绩效公众满意度的测评[J];统计与决策;2016年12期
3 孙思浓;陈岱琪;金慧凝;范忠影;;地方行政服务中心公众满意度的提高策略[J];世纪桥;2016年02期
4 吕承文;周国宝;;行政服务中心建设的发展展望——基于问卷调查研究[J];陕西行政学院学报;2014年03期
5 吕承文;鹿斌;;政府制度创新与行政服务中心建设[J];重庆社会科学;2014年07期
6 李韵州;王翔;;法治政府评估中的公众满意度调查——以53个较大的市为例[J];中国政法大学学报;2014年04期
7 新加坡南洋理工大学南洋公共管理研究生院课题组;吴伟;;2013连氏中国服务型政府调查报告[J];电子政务;2014年04期
8 郑伟民;;行政服务中心:发展、问题与对策[J];行政与法;2014年03期
9 顾伟;;我国行政服务中心发展的研究与探索[J];经营管理者;2013年15期
10 陈茜;;我国政府部门窗口服务存在问题及对策[J];中共山西省直机关党校学报;2013年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 刘璐;焦作市行政服务中心公众满意度测评研究[D];燕山大学;2015年
2 刘飒;地方政府行政服务中心公众满意度影响因素研究[D];新疆农业大学;2015年
3 袁辉;电子政务视角下地方政府政务流程再造研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2009年
4 滕江梅;服务型政府顾客满意度测评研究[D];哈尔滨理工大学;2008年
5 刘贵忠;政府服务的公众满意度测评研究[D];湘潭大学;2005年
,本文编号:2183420
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2183420.html