现代政治批判的不同路径——霍耐特与朗西埃的对话
发布时间：2018-09-05 17:56
【摘要】：霍耐特的"为承认而斗争"和朗西埃的"为平等而斗争"代表了当代西方马克思主义政治批判的两种路径。两者的对话围绕政治的本质界定、政治批判的原则和实现政治的方法展开。在霍耐特看来,朗西埃区分了政治与警治导致政治空无内容,其平等主义欲望的前提是非历史的,其实现政治的方法是一种彻底断裂的外在批判。朗西埃则认为霍耐特的政治批判包含着理想的主体、理想的共同体和历史目的论预设,这种政治批判错失了政治是一个反复斗争的主体化过程,是一个以歧义为出发点的为平等而斗争的过程。两种路径的实质都是从理性批判展开政治批判。复兴现代政治批判的关键不在于遵从当代西方马克思主义的理性批判,而在于回到马克思的政治经济学批判。
[Abstract]:Honet's struggle for recognition and Lonsier's struggle for Equality represent two paths of contemporary Western Marxist political criticism. Their dialogue revolves around the definition of the nature of politics, the principles of political criticism and the method of realizing politics. In Honet's view, Langsier distinguishes politics from police administration and makes politics empty, its premise of egalitarian desire is non-historical, and its method of realizing politics is a completely broken external critique. Lonsier believes that Honet's political criticism includes the ideal subject, ideal community and historical teleological presupposition. This kind of political criticism missed out on politics as a process of repeated struggle. It is a process of struggle for equality based on ambiguity. The essence of the two paths is to launch political criticism from rational criticism. The key to reviving modern political criticism lies not in conforming to the rational criticism of contemporary Western Marxism, but in returning to Marx's critique of political economy.
【作者单位】： 安徽师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“马克思主义意识形态的历史与逻辑研究”[项目编号:13CKS038] 安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目“当代国外马克思主义‘德法论争'的最新进展研究”[项目编号:AHSKQ2016D058]的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D035
，
本文编号：2225024
[Abstract]:Honet's struggle for recognition and Lonsier's struggle for Equality represent two paths of contemporary Western Marxist political criticism. Their dialogue revolves around the definition of the nature of politics, the principles of political criticism and the method of realizing politics. In Honet's view, Langsier distinguishes politics from police administration and makes politics empty, its premise of egalitarian desire is non-historical, and its method of realizing politics is a completely broken external critique. Lonsier believes that Honet's political criticism includes the ideal subject, ideal community and historical teleological presupposition. This kind of political criticism missed out on politics as a process of repeated struggle. It is a process of struggle for equality based on ambiguity. The essence of the two paths is to launch political criticism from rational criticism. The key to reviving modern political criticism lies not in conforming to the rational criticism of contemporary Western Marxism, but in returning to Marx's critique of political economy.
【作者单位】： 安徽师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“马克思主义意识形态的历史与逻辑研究”[项目编号:13CKS038] 安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目“当代国外马克思主义‘德法论争'的最新进展研究”[项目编号:AHSKQ2016D058]的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D035
，
本文编号：2225024
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2225024.html
