网络社团公益行为的监管研究
发布时间：2019-02-22 18:36
【摘要】：科技改变生活,网络改变人们结社、集体行动和公益慈善模式。互联网的发展与普及、利益的分化、公众公共精神和公益精神的觉醒催生了网络社团和网络社团公益行为的兴起。网络社团是一种新型的社会组织形式,网络社团公益行为是一种新型的公益慈善模式。网络社团公益行为的监管是社会组织监管和公益慈善监管的重要内容,也是网络治理的重要内容。加强网络社团公益行为的监管研究具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。参与成本、参与意识、参与价值感和信任度是影响人们参与公共事务和公益慈善的主要因素。网络去中心化、跨时空、便捷、互动性与透明度高等特点使网络社团公益行为部分突破了传统社会组织和公益慈善制度的束缚,降低了人们结社、参与公共事务的成本,激发公众公益热情,颠覆了传统公益思维方式,传播现代公益文化和公益精神,影响公共舆论乃至公共政策,拓展社会组织公益慈善的发展空间,壮大社会组织力量,优化国家—社会格局。然而,由于现有社会组织、公益慈善监管的法律和政策是基于传统物理空间所设计,没有考虑到网络的兴起及网络化的内在要求。现有法律政策存在制度剩余和制度匮乏双重困境,简单延用传统社会组织及其公益监管法律和政策,可能会扼杀或者阻碍网络社团公益行为的活力。大量网络社团和网络公益活动游离于现有法律制度监管之外,遭遇身份合法性困境。与此同时,网络社团社会监督、第三方的专业监督以及网络社团内部治理机制不健全,损害网络社团公益行为的公信力,阻碍网络社团公益快速、可持续发展。在社会组织和公益慈善领域,存在政府失灵、市场失灵或社会失灵,单一的监督管理主体不利于网络社团公益行为的健康发展。因此,需要建立政府、社会、网络社团自身等多元的监督管理体系,实现政府监管与社会监督结合,专业监督与非专业监督互补,他律与自律互动,最终促进网络社团公益行为有序发展、良性繁荣。
[Abstract]:Technology changes life, the Internet changes people's association, collective action and charitable patterns. The development and popularization of the Internet, the differentiation of interests, and the awakening of public spirit and public spirit give birth to the rise of the public behavior of the network community and the network association. The network association is a new form of social organization, and the network community public welfare behavior is a new public welfare charity mode. The supervision of network community public welfare behavior is an important content of social organization supervision and charity supervision, and is also an important content of network governance. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to strengthen the supervision and research of network community public welfare behavior. Participation cost, participation consciousness, participation value and trust are the main factors that affect people's participation in public affairs and charity. The characteristics of network decentralization, span of time and space, convenience, interactivity and high transparency make the public welfare behavior of network community break through the shackles of traditional social organization and charity system, and reduce the cost of people's association and participation in public affairs. Arousing public interest enthusiasm, subverting the traditional mode of public welfare thinking, spreading modern public welfare culture and spirit, influencing public opinion and even public policies, expanding the development space of public welfare charity in social organizations, and strengthening the strength of social organizations, Optimize the state-society pattern. However, because of the existing social organizations, the laws and policies of public charity supervision are based on the traditional physical space, and do not take into account the rise of the network and the inherent requirements of the network. The existing legal policy has the double dilemma of institutional surplus and institutional scarcity. Simply using the traditional social organization and its public welfare supervision laws and policies may stifle or hinder the vitality of the network community's public welfare behavior. A large number of network associations and network public welfare activities are separated from the existing legal system, and encounter the dilemma of identity legitimacy. At the same time, the social supervision of the network community, the professional supervision of the third party and the internal governance mechanism of the network association are not perfect, which impair the credibility of the public welfare behavior of the network community, and hinder the rapid and sustainable development of the public welfare of the network society. In the field of social organization and charity, there are government failure, market failure or social failure, and a single supervision and management body is not conducive to the healthy development of network community public welfare behavior. Therefore, it is necessary to establish multiple supervision and management systems, such as government, society, network associations themselves, so as to realize the combination of government supervision and social supervision, the complementarity between professional supervision and non-professional supervision, and the interaction between heteronomy and self-discipline. Finally promote the network community public welfare behavior orderly development, benign prosperity.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D632.9
本文编号：2428496
[Abstract]:Technology changes life, the Internet changes people's association, collective action and charitable patterns. The development and popularization of the Internet, the differentiation of interests, and the awakening of public spirit and public spirit give birth to the rise of the public behavior of the network community and the network association. The network association is a new form of social organization, and the network community public welfare behavior is a new public welfare charity mode. The supervision of network community public welfare behavior is an important content of social organization supervision and charity supervision, and is also an important content of network governance. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to strengthen the supervision and research of network community public welfare behavior. Participation cost, participation consciousness, participation value and trust are the main factors that affect people's participation in public affairs and charity. The characteristics of network decentralization, span of time and space, convenience, interactivity and high transparency make the public welfare behavior of network community break through the shackles of traditional social organization and charity system, and reduce the cost of people's association and participation in public affairs. Arousing public interest enthusiasm, subverting the traditional mode of public welfare thinking, spreading modern public welfare culture and spirit, influencing public opinion and even public policies, expanding the development space of public welfare charity in social organizations, and strengthening the strength of social organizations, Optimize the state-society pattern. However, because of the existing social organizations, the laws and policies of public charity supervision are based on the traditional physical space, and do not take into account the rise of the network and the inherent requirements of the network. The existing legal policy has the double dilemma of institutional surplus and institutional scarcity. Simply using the traditional social organization and its public welfare supervision laws and policies may stifle or hinder the vitality of the network community's public welfare behavior. A large number of network associations and network public welfare activities are separated from the existing legal system, and encounter the dilemma of identity legitimacy. At the same time, the social supervision of the network community, the professional supervision of the third party and the internal governance mechanism of the network association are not perfect, which impair the credibility of the public welfare behavior of the network community, and hinder the rapid and sustainable development of the public welfare of the network society. In the field of social organization and charity, there are government failure, market failure or social failure, and a single supervision and management body is not conducive to the healthy development of network community public welfare behavior. Therefore, it is necessary to establish multiple supervision and management systems, such as government, society, network associations themselves, so as to realize the combination of government supervision and social supervision, the complementarity between professional supervision and non-professional supervision, and the interaction between heteronomy and self-discipline. Finally promote the network community public welfare behavior orderly development, benign prosperity.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D632.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 李磊,王名,沈恒超;网上社团及其管理:NGO新领域探讨[J];南京社会科学;2002年01期
，本文编号：2428496
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2428496.html
