当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 证券论文 >

我国中小板上市公司IPO超募与投资不足关系的实证研究

发布时间:2018-01-10 07:18

  本文关键词:我国中小板上市公司IPO超募与投资不足关系的实证研究 出处:《浙江工商大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: IPO超募 投资不足 中小企业


【摘要】:超募是我国IPO市场一直存在的特有现象。自从2009年我国IPO重启以来,新上市公司频频出现高超募现象,引起了社会各界对超募的广泛关注,而中小企业IPO高超募情况又更加突出。投资决策作为公司财务管理三大政策之一,是公司配置资源,实现价值最大化的重要手段。公司的投资决策能否很好的利用超募资金,超募的存在对于公司投资决策又有什么影响,是否会引起投资的低效率?这些都是很值得研究的问题。鉴于此,本文探索性的对我国中小板上市公司IPO超募和投资不足的关系进行研究,具有一定的理论意义和现实意义。 本文以截止2008年12月31日于我国深圳证券交易所上市的中小板公司为样本,结合国内外相关文献回顾及委托代理理论和信息不对称理论的分析,对IPO超募与投资不足的关系进行实证研究。首先,利用改进的Richardson (2006)模型计算出本文样本公司的投资不足情况;其次,对是否超募与投资不足的关系进行Logistic回归分析;进一步,对超募的严重程度与投资不足的关系进行Logistic回归分析。 根据以上研究,本文得出以下结论:(1)我国中小板上市公司IPO后投资不足情况较多。从改进的Richardson (2006)模型的残差结果分析,投资不足占到了63.33%,说明我国中小企业投资不足情况比较严重;(2)我国中小板企业IPO超募情况与投资不足正相关,表明工PO超募资金的存在,使得公司更易发生投资不足行为;而超募的严重程度,无论以中位数划分还是以平均数划分,都与投资不足正相关,说明超募情况越严重,公司投资不足越容易发生,说明超募的存在确实恶化了我国中小企业的投资效率。最后本文尝试性的为我国监管部门、企业、投资者提出政策建议,希望能为规范我国IPO市场的有效运作、减少IPO超募情况的发生和提高我国资本市场资金的使用效率做出贡献。同时建议有关部门要鼓励我国中小企业多进行合理的投资,从而使得中小企业能健康快速地发展。
[Abstract]:The super offering is a unique phenomenon in China's IPO market has been in existence. Since 2009 China IPO restart, listed companies frequently appear superb raised phenomenon, has aroused widespread attention to the raised, the small and medium-sized enterprise IPO and superb raised more prominent. The investment decision as the company's financial management is one of the three policy, is the company the allocation of resources, an important means to realize the value maximization. The company's investment decisions whether raised funds to good use, there are raised and what impact on corporate investment decisions, whether it will lead to low efficiency of investment? These are very worthy of study. In view of this, this paper exploratory research on China's SME board listed companies raised IPO and lack of investment, has a certain theoretical significance and practical significance.
In this paper, by the end of December 31, 2008 listed on the Shenzhen stock exchange of China's small and medium-sized board company as the sample, with the domestic and foreign literature review and analysis of the principal-agent theory and asymmetric information theory, empirical research on the relationship between IPO and investment raised. Firstly, using the improved Richardson (2006) model to calculate the investment in this paper, the Sample Firms; secondly, the relationship is raised and the lack of investment in the Logistic regression analysis; further, the relationship between the severity and insufficient investment raised by Logistic regression analysis.
According to the above research, this paper draws the following conclusions: (1) listed companies invest less after IPO. The improved Richardson (2006) model residual analysis, lack of investment accounted for 63.33% of China's small and medium enterprises that insufficient investment is more serious; (2) IPO in small and medium sized enterprise board I in the raised situation and insufficient investment is positively related to PO indicates the presence of excess funds raised, making the company more susceptible to insufficient investment behavior; the severity and raised, whether by median divided or average division, and the lack of investment are positively related, that raised more serious, inadequate investment more easily that happens, the existence of super offering does deteriorate the efficiency of investment of small and medium-sized enterprises in China. Finally, this paper attempts to China's regulatory authorities, enterprises, put forward the policy recommendations of investors, hoping to be able to regulate the IPO market in China effectively Operation can reduce the occurrence of IPO over raising and improve the efficiency of capital market in China. Meanwhile, it is suggested that the relevant departments should encourage more rational investment of SMEs in China, so that SMEs can develop healthily and rapidly.

【学位授予单位】:浙江工商大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F275;F832.51;F224

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 江伟;沈艺峰;;大股东控制、资产替代与债权人保护[J];财经研究;2005年12期

2 徐晓东;张天西;;公司治理、自由现金流与非效率投资[J];财经研究;2009年10期

3 蔡吉甫;;非效率投资、公司业绩及其影响因素研究[J];财会通讯;2010年09期

4 程哲;;公司治理对投资不足的影响性研究[J];财会通讯;2011年33期

5 冯晓;崔毅;;创业板超募现象的制度性思考[J];财会月刊;2010年23期

6 黄琴;马俊杰;;“超募”提升了创业板公司业绩吗[J];财会月刊;2011年32期

7 王峰娟;张运来;徐皎;;创业板“超募”现象及其治理[J];财务与会计(理财版);2010年07期

8 欧阳凌,欧阳令南,周红霞;股权制度安排、信息不对称与企业非效率投资行为[J];当代经济科学;2005年04期

9 蒋东生;;过度投资与企业价值[J];管理世界;2011年01期

10 周义兴;;遏制新股发行超募需有中小投资者参与制度安排[J];股市动态分析;2010年01期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 崔萍;中国上市公司投资不足和过度投资研究[D];暨南大学;2006年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 杨品芸;董事会特征、非效率投资与公司价值的实证研究[D];西南财经大学;2011年



本文编号:1404337

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhqtouz/1404337.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户91c1a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com