当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 证券论文 >

创业板上市公司智力资本与公司价值关系的实证研究

发布时间:2018-04-06 01:23

  本文选题:智力资本 切入点:公司价值 出处:《中南民族大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:曾经风靡全球的“中国制造”近几年来面临发展危机,打破僵局,寻找提升公司竞争优势、增加公司价值的“利器”成为理论界和实践界共同的目标。知识经济时代的来临,智力资本被认为是企业价值创造的新推手,过去的几十年里许多学者对于智力资本的价值进行了探索式的研究,但基于中国背景下关于智力资本与公司价值关系的研究尚不多见。本文主要研究中国创业板上市公司智力资本与公司价值之间的关系,因为创业板市场是资本市场技术创新和商业模式创新的晴雨表,在一定程度上一个国家创业板市场的活跃程度反映了这个国家的经济活力和技术创新水平,提升“中国制造”的新生军在创业板市场,而且在创业板市场上市的公司基本上属于智力资本密集型。 本文在阅读理论文献的基础上,,依次对智力资本概念、构成、测量、公司价值评估、智力资本与公司价值的相关研究进行梳理,建立本文的理论模型,并以此提出假设与各项指标的设计。本文主要是探讨不同公司背景下上市公司智力资本、公司价值是否存在差异,智力资本各构成要素人力资本、结构资本、关系资本和创新资本与公司财务价值、非财务价值之间具体关系。围绕于此,通过调查问卷、统计分析进行了假设检验,研究结论总结如下:(1)创业板上市公司在公司规模、成立时间、公司性质和地区分布的背景下,智力资本与公司价值情况并未表现出差异性,在行业分布、公司类型的背景下差异性显著;(2)创业板上市公司智力资本对公司财务价值有显著正向影响,上市公司智力资本对促进公司财务价值的提升有着重要意义,按照与公司财务价值关系强度由大到小排列顺序为创新资本、结构资本、关系资本、人力资本;(3)创业板上市公司智力资本对公司非财务价值有显著正向影响,上市公司智力资本对公司非财务价值作用不可忽视,关系强度由大到小排列顺序为关系资本、人力资本、创新资本、结构资本。
[Abstract]:"made in China", once popular all over the world, is facing development crisis in recent years. Breaking the deadlock, looking for the "sharp weapon" to enhance the competitive advantage and increase the value of the company has become the common goal of the theoretical and practical circles.With the advent of the era of knowledge economy, intellectual capital is regarded as a new driver of enterprise value creation. In the past few decades, many scholars have carried out exploratory research on the value of intellectual capital.However, there are few researches on the relationship between intellectual capital and corporate value under the background of China.This paper mainly studies the relationship between intellectual capital and corporate value of listed companies in gem, because gem is a barometer of technological innovation and business model innovation in capital market.To a certain extent, the activity of a country's gem market reflects the economic vitality and technological innovation level of this country, and promotes the "made in China" new army in the gem market.And in the gem market listed companies are basically intellectual capital-intensive.On the basis of reading the theoretical literature, this paper combs the related research on the concept, constitution, measurement, company value evaluation, intellectual capital and company value of intellectual capital, and establishes the theoretical model of this paper.And then put forward the hypothesis and the design of each index.This paper mainly discusses the intellectual capital of listed companies under different corporate backgrounds, whether there are differences in corporate value, the human capital, structural capital, relational capital, innovation capital and corporate financial value of intellectual capital.Specific relationship between non-financial value.Around this, through the questionnaire, the statistical analysis carries on the hypothesis test, the research conclusion is summarized as follows: 1) under the background of the company size, the time of establishment, the nature of the company and the regional distribution, the gem listed companies are listed in the background of company size, establishment time, company nature and regional distribution.There is no difference between intellectual capital and corporate value. In the background of industry distribution and company type, the difference is significant (2) the intellectual capital of listed companies on gem has a significant positive impact on the financial value of the company.The intellectual capital of listed companies plays an important role in promoting the promotion of the financial value of the company. According to the order of the relationship between the intellectual capital and the financial value of the company, the order is innovation capital, structural capital and relational capital.The intellectual capital of listed companies has a significant positive impact on the non-financial value of the company. The effect of intellectual capital on the non-financial value of the listed company can not be ignored, and the relationship intensity is arranged in the order of the relationship capital from large to small.Human capital, innovation capital, structural capital.
【学位授予单位】:中南民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:F272;F832.51

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈劲,谢洪源,朱朝晖;企业智力资本评价模型和实证研究[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2004年06期

2 李嘉明,黎富兵;企业智力资本与企业绩效的实证分析[J];重庆大学学报(自然科学版);2004年12期

3 王华;知识资本与财务资本可否共存同享股权[J];时代财会;2003年08期

4 张丹;;我国企业智力资本报告建立的现实基础:来自上市公司年报的检验[J];会计研究;2008年01期

5 蒋琰;茅宁;;智力资本与财务资本:谁对企业价值创造更有效——来自于江浙地区企业的实证研究[J];会计研究;2008年07期

6 卢馨;黄顺;;智力资本驱动企业绩效的有效性研究——基于制造业、信息技术业和房地产业的实证分析[J];会计研究;2009年02期

7 蒋天颖;;企业智力资本的结构与测量[J];科学学与科学技术管理;2009年05期

8 王月欣;;试论确定智力资本价值的折现率[J];科学学研究;2005年S1期

9 丛海涛;唐元虎;;隐性知识转移、共享的激励机制研究[J];科研管理;2007年01期

10 蒋天颖;王俊江;;智力资本、组织学习与企业创新绩效的关系分析[J];科研管理;2009年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 孙涛;智力资本评价及其对组织绩效的影响研究[D];浙江大学;2003年



本文编号:1717355

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhqtouz/1717355.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户05d73***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com