传统教学方式和小组合作教学方式在高中数学课程中的效果比较研究
[Abstract]:At present, the classroom reform has entered the latest stage of development. Independent, cooperative, inquiry teaching methods become the main focus of teaching. Group cooperative learning is one of the commonly used teaching methods, which is favored by many teachers and students. This teaching method has many advantages which other teaching methods do not have. Group cooperative learning is helpful to improve students' sense of cooperation and competition, to improve students' communication level, to help students to learn independently, and to enhance students' interest in learning. However, any teaching method is not omnipotent. Group cooperative learning also has many problems and limitations in teaching, which needs to combine with traditional teaching methods to exert the greatest effect. Throughout the study of group cooperative learning and traditional teaching methods, the basic focus of the two teaching methods is the disadvantages of the two teaching methods, the comparison of the two teaching methods of the study is very little. In particular, there is no comparison between the two teaching methods in high school mathematics teaching. The purpose of this paper is to study the connotation of cooperative learning, the theoretical basis of traditional teaching methods, and the characteristics of traditional teaching methods, through literature reading, research on the connotation of cooperative learning, the theoretical basis of traditional teaching methods, and the characteristics of traditional teaching methods. This paper compares the advantages and disadvantages of the traditional teaching mode and the group cooperative teaching mode through the comparison of the natural experiments, and finds out the mathematics classroom teaching mode suitable for the rural high school with low starting point. Research method: the author carries on the equal group contrast experiment, selects two mathematics classes in the high school, one class as the experimental class, the other class as the control class, the experimental class adopts the group cooperative learning teaching method, the control class adopts the traditional teaching method. At the beginning of the semester, the two classes were tested, and then each teaching method was used for one semester of teaching, and then re-tested, and the advantages and disadvantages of cooperative learning in classroom teaching were analyzed in detail through a questionnaire survey. Research results: through the comparison of the experimental results and the detailed analysis of the questionnaire survey, the necessity, advantages and disadvantages of cooperative learning are discussed. Compared with the traditional teaching, the conclusion of the paper is to solve the problem of group cooperative learning. According to the experiment and analysis of the second part, the selection and application of mathematics teaching methods in senior high school are analyzed, and the organic combination of group cooperation and traditional teaching methods is advocated. 4. The research conclusion: group cooperative learning can promote students' initiative. The traditional teaching method emphasizes the teacher's explanation, the combination of the two must bring into play the greater effect, only the student's cooperation and the teacher's careful explanation combination, fully coordinates the teacher-student interaction relationship. In order to improve the effect of classroom teaching, group cooperative learning and traditional teaching should be closely combined and applied efficiently.
【学位授予单位】:贵州师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G633.6
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李芳;;幼儿园合作教学刍探[J];当代教育论坛(综合研究);2010年10期
2 王坦;合作教学的基本类型与理念析要[J];山东教育科研;1999年12期
3 哈申;;关于小学音乐合作教学的反思[J];鸭绿江(下半月版);2014年01期
4 何永国;何永科;;语文有效合作教学的探索和研究[J];教育;2014年19期
5 刘松仁;;如何实施数学课堂合作教学[J];中学生数理化(教与学.教研版);2007年09期
6 陈建林;;如何让数学小组合作教学更有效[J];数理化学习;2009年11期
7 张淑珍;;浅谈对初中数学课堂合作教学的探究实践[J];课程教育研究;2013年09期
8 莫银棣;切磋琢磨进行合作教学[J];化学教学;1993年02期
9 徐俭;语文课堂合作教学浅探[J];语文教学通讯;2000年19期
10 叶斌;浅谈“发现法”与“合作教学法”在教学中的应用[J];中国远程教育;2000年06期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 李珍;;自主合作教学之我见[A];2014年3月现代教育教学探索学术交流会论文集[C];2014年
2 蓝敏;;谈谈合作教学在日语课堂教学中的初步尝试[A];《新时代的脚步声》之五——现代教育新论[C];2002年
3 解玮;;浅谈初中政治合作教学[A];2014年9月现代教育教学探索学术交流会论文集[C];2014年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 毕节市生机中学 刘洪碧;初中数学合作教学模式初探[N];贵州民族报;2009年
2 秦谈顺;如何让小组合作教学走得更好[N];吕梁日报;2010年
3 江苏省江阴高级中学实验学校 奚炯;音乐教学中的合作学习[N];成才导报.教育周刊;2007年
4 杨千 刘佳;时代呼唤“合作教学”[N];中国教师报;2009年
5 临颖县大郭乡第二初级中学 王伟飒;“小组合作教学”的探索与实践[N];学知报;2010年
6 但雪莲 广元外国语学校;“合作教学”在小学英语教学中的运用[N];广元日报;2011年
7 彝良县毛坪中学 周盛荣;浅议小组合作教学的操作[N];云南经济日报;2013年
8 姚叶青;在合作中迈向成功[N];钦州日报;2010年
9 广饶县颜徐学校 崔学良;初中英语合作教学的几点做法[N];学知报;2011年
10 株洲市第十二中学 王茜;合作教学教会学生合作[N];中国教育报;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 唐文君;农村高中英语小组合作教学的路径和策略[D];四川师范大学;2015年
2 翟宗艳;中小学音乐合作教学理论与实践探究[D];曲阜师范大学;2015年
3 张亚玲;“分层合作教学法”在高职院校健美操选项课教学的实验研究[D];牡丹江师范学院;2015年
4 韦雨卉;韩国初高中汉语合作教学中的文化教学[D];广东外语外贸大学;2015年
5 李伟东;传统教学方式和小组合作教学方式在高中数学课程中的效果比较研究[D];贵州师范大学;2015年
6 杨娟;广西高校大学英语教师合作教学调查研究[D];广西师范大学;2009年
7 高琪;“分组合作教学法”在乒乓球反手推挡教学中的实验研究[D];首都体育学院;2015年
8 雷闪闪;语文课堂合作教学研究[D];湖南师范大学;2014年
9 周海乾;论合作教学与学生差异资源的开发[D];广西师范大学;2001年
10 李郁;初中外来民工子弟语文合作教学初探[D];苏州大学;2013年
,本文编号:2441354
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/2441354.html