新西兰《提升一为成功而努力:毛利人教育战略规划2008-2012》研究
发布时间:2018-06-09 05:23
本文选题:新西兰 + 少数民族教育 ; 参考:《西南大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:少数民族教育发展是国家教育事业发展的重要指标,持续提升与保障少数民族教育水平已然成为世界各国促进教育公平的核心所在。2008年,新西兰教育部发布《提升—为成功而努力:毛利人教育战略规划2008-2012》,试图通过战略规划的形式提升毛利人教育质量,改变毛利人教育落后的现实。 本研究以《提升—为成功而努力:毛利人教育战略规划2008-2012》文本为出发点,以战略规划制定的多元文化教育理论为基础,逐步解析新西兰毛利人教育战略规划产生的背景、内容构成、成效及影响,深入分析战略规划的特征与价值,获得毛利人教育战略规划的实施对我国少数民族教育的借鉴与启示。本研究采用文献法、比较法、因素分析法,试图回答新西兰《毛利人教育战略规划2008-2012》是什么?为何产生(Why)?战略规划的实施产生了什么效果、带来了何种影响(How)?毛利人教育战略规划的实施经验是否值得我国少数民族借鉴?等问题。 第一部分指出《毛利人教育战略规划2008-2012》产生的背景,毛利学生的学业成绩是现实问题;毛利人文化与教育的分离是毛利人教育落后的深层原因。 第二部分是《毛利人教育战略规划2008-2012》的核心部分,本研究从战略规划定位,战略规划愿景,战略规划理论依据和战略规划关注领域对战略规划进行了全面综合的分析。该部分主要以文本为基础对战略规划的内容进行了梳理,是本研究的重点所在。 第三部分进行了对两个个案的分析。一所国立学校对毛利语教学改革;一所特殊学校加强毛利学生教学改革。 第四部分对《毛利人教育战略规划2008-2012》的实施效果进行了分析。更多的毛利幼儿获得高质量的早期教育;更多的毛利青少年获得更好的教育;更多学生有机会学习毛利语。 第五部对《毛利人教育战略规划2008-2012》做出了客观评价。对前后毛利人教育战略规划进行了比较;分析了战略规划的价值取向和产生的积极影响。 第六部分分析了《毛利人教育战略规划2008-2012》的借鉴与启示。该部分从我国少数民族教育存在问题为起点,对照新西兰毛利人教育战略规划获得的经验,得出对我国少数民族教育事业有益的借鉴。
[Abstract]:The development of minority education is an important indicator of the development of national education. To continuously improve and guarantee the education level of ethnic minorities has become the core of promoting educational equity in all countries in the world. In 2008, The Ministry of Education of New Zealand has released "upgrading-working for success: the Strategic Plan for Maori Education 2008-2012" in an attempt to improve the quality of Maori education in the form of strategic planning. To change the reality of Maori education backwardness. This study is based on the theory of multicultural education, which is based on the text of "Promotion-striving for success: the Strategic Plan of Maori Education 2008-2012". The background, content, effect and influence of Maori education strategic planning in New Zealand are analyzed step by step, and the characteristics and value of strategic planning are analyzed. The implementation of Maori education strategy plan for our national minority education reference and inspiration. This study uses the literature method, comparative method, factor analysis method to try to answer the New Zealand Maori Education Strategic Plan 2008-2012 is what? Why did Whyan come into being? What has been the impact of the implementation of strategic planning, and what has been the impact? Is the implementation experience of Maori education strategic planning worth learning from ethnic minorities in our country? The first part points out the background of the "Maori Education Strategic Plan 2008-2012", and the academic achievement of Maori students is a realistic problem; The separation of Maori culture and education is the deep cause of Maori education backwardness. The second part is the core part of Maori Education Strategic Planning 2008-2012. The theoretical basis of strategic planning and the field of attention to strategic planning are comprehensively analyzed. This part mainly combs the content of strategic planning on the basis of text, which is the focus of this study. The third part analyzes the two cases. A national school reforms Maori language teaching and a special school strengthens Maori students' teaching reform. The fourth part analyzes the effect of Maori Education Strategic Plan 2008-2012. More Maori children have high quality early education; more Maori adolescents have better education; more students have the opportunity to learn Maori language. Part V makes an objective evaluation of the Maori Education Strategic Plan 2008-2012. This paper compares the Maori education strategic planning before and after, analyzes the value orientation and the positive influence of the strategic planning. The sixth part analyzes the reference and enlightenment of Maori Education Strategic Planning 2008-2012. This part starts with the existing problems of minority education in our country and compares the experiences gained by Maori education strategic planning in New Zealand, and draws a useful reference for the education of ethnic minorities in our country.
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:G759.612
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 顾明远;;国际理解与比较教育[J];比较教育研究;2005年12期
2 彭虹斌;;比较教育功能的时代转换:从借鉴到理解[J];比较教育研究;2007年03期
3 李文英;程绍仁;;埃德蒙·金教育决策理论探析[J];比较教育研究;2009年08期
4 屈书杰;;迈克尔·萨德勒比较教育思想的现实意义[J];比较教育研究;2009年08期
5 雷明珠;;民族学视角下的少数民族教育问题探析[J];广东技术师范学院学报;2011年01期
6 潘苏东;评埃德蒙·金比较教育分析模式[J];复旦教育论坛;2003年03期
7 方彤;外国教育规划研究泛谈[J];河北师范大学学报(教育科学版);2000年04期
8 万明钢;安静;;全球化与多元文化张力下公民教育的变革——班克斯公民教育思想述评[J];教育科学;2010年05期
9 万明钢;;从“差异”走向“承认”的多元文化教育[J];教育研究;2008年11期
10 王希;多元文化主义的起源、实践与局限性[J];美国研究;2000年02期
,本文编号:1999134
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/crjy/1999134.html
教材专著