S大学科研绩效评价体系研究

发布时间：2018-02-17 03:45

本文关键词： 高校科研绩效评价指标体系平衡计分卡层次分析法　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：绩效评价是高校科研经费从数量增加到质量提升的现实要求,是提高科研经费使用效率的必然选择,是国际高等教育发展的普遍趋势。S大学的战略目标明确提出,优化学科布局,实施人才强校战略,把S大学建设成为国家高素质人才培养的重要基地、高水平科学研究和技术创新的重要中心,为世界一流大学建设奠定良好的基础。如何提高高校的科研能力,是目前高校管理者和科研人员普遍关注的问题。笔者认为,加强高校的科研绩效评价,是提高科研能力的有效措施,也是监督、导向、反馈科研活动的重要手段。本文重点是对S大学的科研绩效进行评价。首先,介绍了科研绩效评价的相关理论,以及高校科研绩效评价区别于企业绩效评价的特点和相应的绩效评价原则,分析了科研绩效评价体系各要素及其各要素之间的关系;其次,对S大学的科研发展和科研绩效评价的现状进行了分析,指出了 S大学科研绩效评价存在的问题;第三,确定了 S大学科研绩效评价的目标、主体、客体以及评价方法,对运用平衡计分卡进行科研绩效评价指标的选取和运用层次分析法确定指标权重进行了可行性分析,确定了评价方法;第四,运用平衡计分卡法,围绕科研经费、社会评价、效率、学习与成长四个维度,共17个二级评价指标进行了分析;第五,根据不同学科类型确定评价标准和指标权重,采用层次分析法对问卷调查结果进行分析,计算出不同学科类别的指标权重;最后,以S大学为例,抽取几个科研项目数据进行评价,对评价结果进行分析,并提出相关建议。本文的创新点在于构建了基于平衡计分卡的科研绩效评价指标体系,根据S大学科研项目的实际情况,选取了 17个指标,从科研经费、社会评价、效率、学习与成长四个维度设计了绩效评价指标;根据综合性大学的学科特点,创新性的提出了根据学科类型确定指标权重,并采用层次分析法计算权重,为S大学科研绩效评价工作提供了新的思路。
[Abstract]:Performance evaluation is the realistic requirement of increasing scientific research funds from quantity to quality, is the inevitable choice to improve the efficiency of scientific research funds, and is the strategic goal of international higher education development. To optimize the distribution of disciplines, implement the strategy of strengthening schools with talents, and build S University into an important base for the training of high-quality talents, an important center for high-level scientific research and technological innovation, How to improve the scientific research ability of colleges and universities is a common concern of university administrators and researchers at present. The author believes that strengthening the evaluation of scientific research performance in colleges and universities is of great concern. It is an effective measure to improve scientific research ability, and also an important means to supervise, guide and feedback scientific research activities. This paper focuses on the evaluation of S University's scientific research performance. First of all, it introduces the relevant theories of scientific research performance evaluation. As well as the characteristics of scientific research performance evaluation in colleges and universities different from enterprise performance evaluation and the corresponding performance evaluation principles, this paper analyzes the relationship between the various elements of the evaluation system of scientific research performance and their elements; secondly, This paper analyzes the current situation of S University's scientific research development and evaluation of scientific research performance, points out the problems existing in S university's scientific research performance evaluation, and third, determines the objectives, subjects, objects and evaluation methods of S university's scientific research performance evaluation. The selection of scientific research performance evaluation index using balanced scorecard and the feasibility analysis of determining index weight by AHP are analyzed, and the evaluation method is determined. 4th, the use of balanced scorecard method, around scientific research funds, social evaluation, Efficiency, learning and growth of four dimensions, a total of 17 secondary evaluation indicators were analyzed; 5th, according to different types of disciplines to determine the evaluation criteria and index weights, using the Analytic hierarchy process to analyze the results of the questionnaire, Finally, taking S University as an example, several scientific research project data are selected for evaluation, and the evaluation results are analyzed. The innovation of this paper is to construct the evaluation index system of scientific research performance based on balanced scorecard. According to the actual situation of S university scientific research projects, 17 indexes are selected, from research funds, social evaluation, efficiency. Four dimensions of learning and growth designed performance evaluation indicators, according to the characteristics of comprehensive universities, innovative proposed according to the types of disciplines to determine the weight of indicators, and use the Analytic hierarchy process to calculate the weight, It provides a new idea for S university scientific research performance evaluation.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G644

【相似文献】