法律史之命运:如何让历史融入法学课堂——以对沪上高校中国法制史课程状况的调研为切入点

发布时间：2018-05-02 13:29

本文选题：法律史 + 中国法制史教学　；参考：《广州广播电视大学学报》2016年05期

【摘要】：中国法制史可谓是法学课堂上的一道"历史难题"。近年来,学生厌斯学,同行轻斯学,中国法制史课程甚至都曾落到朝不保夕的地步。就目前大陆法学院校中国法制史课程的教学状况而言,毫无史学基础的法科学生刚步入大学就要学习连历史系学生都望而生畏的周鼎汉简、唐律宋敕、明诰清典无异于饮鸩止渴,将学生拒之于法史殿堂之门外。中国法制史课程对于培养法科学生人文素养的重要性毋庸置疑,但是现有中国法制史课程教学之困窘也是有凭有据。有鉴于此,欲复兴法律史学,必须紧抓中国法制史课堂,对现有的教学模式做出较大改革。比如,重新编纂高质量的教材、增设历史类公共课程、增强中国法制史师资、改革授课方式、改革考核方式等等。中国法制史课堂是中国法律史学科生存与发展之本,唯有让广大学生真正喜爱上这门课程,才能让中国法律史在法学大家庭中站稳脚跟。
[Abstract]:The history of Chinese legal system is a historical problem in the law class. In recent years, students are tired of learning, peer study, Chinese legal history curriculum has even fallen into the stage of uncertainty. As far as the current teaching situation of the Chinese legal history course in mainland law colleges is concerned, as soon as the law students who have no historical foundation enter the university, they will study Zhou Ding's Han Bamboo slips, the Tang Law and Song Chi, which are feared by even the history students. Ming-Ming Qing code is tantamount to drinking poison to quench thirst, students shut out of the palace of law. There is no doubt about the importance of Chinese legal history course in cultivating the humanistic literacy of legal science students, but there is also evidence for the embarrassment in the teaching of Chinese legal history course. In view of this, in order to revive the history of law, we must pay close attention to the Chinese legal history classroom and reform the existing teaching mode. For example, recompiling high-quality teaching materials, adding public history courses, strengthening Chinese legal history teachers, reforming teaching methods, reforming assessment methods, etc. Chinese legal history classroom is the foundation of the existence and development of Chinese legal history subject. Only by making the majority of students really like to take this course can Chinese legal history stand firmly in the family of law.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【基金】：华东政法大学2016年度校级研究生创新项目“你想要什么样的法律史——基于长三角高校法律史教学状况调研数据的实证研究”(项目编号:2016-4-104)
【分类号】：G642;D929-4

【相似文献】