基于“主体间性”的精品课程评价系统及其构建

发布时间：2019-03-20 14:03

【摘要】：精品课程评价是一个多主体间参与互动并协同增效的"主体间性"过程。"主体间性"视角不但为洞悉传统精品课程评价存在的一元主体主导、师生参与不足、协商交流不够、评价与改进脱节等问题提供了分析透镜,而且为构建起有效的精品课程评价系统提供了可行路径。为此,在构建"主体间性"的精品课程教学评价系统SPR模型的基础上,文章形成包括4个评价维度、15个评价基面、44个评价影响因子的指标体系,经Delphi法确定指标权重后,基于AHP层次分析的实证过程,在证明了指标信度和效度的同时,得出各层级指标的总排序权重,反映出"教学过程"和"教学效果"中的对话沟通、"教学方法"中的"互动式教学"备受重视,"主体间性"评价需求提升。文章基于实证研究结论的省思可得,"主体间性"的课程教学评价系统的践行离不开理念、制度、机制和平台等条件的构建与支持。
[Abstract]:The evaluation of high-quality courses is a "inter-subjectivity" process in which multi-subjects participate in interaction and cooperate with each other. " The perspective of "intersubjectivity" not only provides an analytical lens for understanding the problems of traditional excellent curriculum evaluation, such as single subject leading, insufficient participation of teachers and students, insufficient negotiation and communication, disjunction between evaluation and improvement, and so on. It also provides a feasible path for constructing an effective evaluation system of fine courses. Therefore, on the basis of constructing the SPR model of the "intersubjectivity" excellent course teaching evaluation system, the paper forms an index system which includes 4 evaluation dimensions, 15 evaluation bases and 44 evaluation impact factors. After the index weight is determined by Delphi method, the index weight is determined by the Delphi method. Based on the empirical process of AHP Analytic hierarchy process, while proving the reliability and validity of the indicators, the total ranking weights of the indicators at each level are obtained, which reflects the dialogue and communication between the "teaching process" and "the teaching effect". The "interactive teaching" in the teaching method is paid more attention to, and the evaluation demand of "inter-subjectivity" is enhanced. Based on the reflection of the empirical research conclusion, the practice of the "inter-subjectivity" curriculum evaluation system can not be separated from the construction and support of the concept, system, mechanism and platform, etc.
【作者单位】：南昌大学公共管理学院;南昌大学第四临床医学院;重庆大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：江西省教育科学项目(11YB273) 南昌大学教改项目(NCUJGLX0715)
【分类号】：G642.3

【相似文献】