哈佛大学与复旦大学通识教育课程设置比较研究
发布时间：2019-04-03 08:41
【摘要】：美国哈佛大学和中国复旦大学在通识教育课程体系的设置上,既存在相同之处也存在明显的差异性。它们的共同性表现在:1)通识课程内容的多元性;2)通识课程类型的划分,并要求在大学一年级进行;3)体现了生活教育和公民教育的理念。其差异性表现在:1)哈佛大学较好地兼顾了人文学科、社会科学和自然科学三大知识门类,而在复旦大学的通识教育课程体系中,社会科学类课程比重偏低;2)哈佛大学在涉及外国文化的课程中兼顾了地域上的广泛性,而复旦大学的通识教育课程则表现出明显的欧美中心主义特点;3)哈佛大学有相当一部分的专题性课程或研讨性课程,而复旦大学则以概论性课程和原著导读性课程为主。两所高校在通识教育课程设置上的差异在很大程度上代表了在两个不同文化传统、不同发展阶段、不同政治体制下,开展通识教育的不同探索。
[Abstract]:Both Harvard University and Fudan University in the United States have the same and obvious differences in setting up the curriculum system of general education. Their commonality is as follows: 1) the diversity of the contents of the general education curriculum; 2) the classification of the general education curriculum types, and 3) the concept of life education and civic education; 3) the classification of the general education curriculum types and the requirement to be carried out in the first grade of the university. The differences are as follows: 1) Harvard University takes into account the humanities, social sciences and natural sciences. However, in Fudan University's general education curriculum system, the proportion of social sciences courses is low; 2) in the courses involving foreign culture, Harvard University takes into account the geographical extensiveness, while the general education curriculum of Fudan University shows obvious characteristics of European and American centrism; 3) Harvard University has quite a number of thematic courses or seminar courses, while Fudan University mainly focuses on general courses and original books-oriented courses. To a great extent, the differences in the curriculum arrangement of general education between the two universities represent the different exploration of carrying out general education in two different cultural traditions, different stages of development and different political systems.
【作者单位】： 华南师范大学教育国际化研究中心;
【基金】：2012年国家社会科学基金(教育学)一般课题“中美研究型大学通识教育模式比较研究”(BDA120026)的成果
【分类号】：G642.3
，
本文编号：2453076
[Abstract]:Both Harvard University and Fudan University in the United States have the same and obvious differences in setting up the curriculum system of general education. Their commonality is as follows: 1) the diversity of the contents of the general education curriculum; 2) the classification of the general education curriculum types, and 3) the concept of life education and civic education; 3) the classification of the general education curriculum types and the requirement to be carried out in the first grade of the university. The differences are as follows: 1) Harvard University takes into account the humanities, social sciences and natural sciences. However, in Fudan University's general education curriculum system, the proportion of social sciences courses is low; 2) in the courses involving foreign culture, Harvard University takes into account the geographical extensiveness, while the general education curriculum of Fudan University shows obvious characteristics of European and American centrism; 3) Harvard University has quite a number of thematic courses or seminar courses, while Fudan University mainly focuses on general courses and original books-oriented courses. To a great extent, the differences in the curriculum arrangement of general education between the two universities represent the different exploration of carrying out general education in two different cultural traditions, different stages of development and different political systems.
【作者单位】： 华南师范大学教育国际化研究中心;
【基金】：2012年国家社会科学基金(教育学)一般课题“中美研究型大学通识教育模式比较研究”(BDA120026)的成果
【分类号】：G642.3
，
本文编号：2453076
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/gaodengjiaoyulunwen/2453076.html
