高中文理分科对大学生学业表现影响的研究

发布时间：2018-03-28 08:56

  本文选题：文理分科　切入点：分科与综合　出处：《辽宁师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：文理分科之争是教育界热门的争议话题，结合《国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要（2010-2020）》问题征集引发的大讨论，可见，文理分科问题日益成为困扰我国新一轮课程改革的一大困惑和障碍。其背后是课程论本质：对分科还是综合问题的判定和回答。 纵观该问题的相关研究多是对分科与综合利弊关系的理论思考或分科综合与学生某项认知能力相关性的实证研究，，而将文理分科实施影响的研究视野从高中延展至大学学习，统计分析与调查研究方式相结合的相关研究为之寥寥。本文站在大学学习视角审视文理分科对学生学业成绩和学业态度的综合影响，着重从以下几个方面展开阐述： 第一部分：相关研究的文献综述，对过往相关研究进行分类细致梳理，找出与文章理论有益的论点。 第二部分：对大学生大学专业课程、非专业课程及高考文理科成绩的统计学分析比对，揭示各科成绩间的相关性，直观反映文理分科对大学生学业影响。 第三部分：对大学师生文理分科态度的调查问卷，针对数据统计分析可能存在的不足，做到主客观相结合，全面论证文理分科对大学生群体的影响。 第四部分：观点和认识，结合上述分析和调查研究，结合自身对文理分科的理论思考，对文理分科的长期争端提出自己的观点和意见建议。
[Abstract]:The debate over the division of arts and sciences is a hot and controversial topic in the field of education. Combining with the "outline of the National Medium-and Long-term Education Reform and Development Plan 2010-2020)", the discussion triggered by the collection of problems can be seen. The problem of the division of arts and science has increasingly become a major puzzle and obstacle for the new round of curriculum reform in our country. Behind it is the nature of curriculum theory: the judgment and answer to the question of division or synthesis. Most of the relevant studies on this question are theoretical thinking on the relationship between the advantages and disadvantages of the sub-subject and synthesis, or empirical research on the correlation between the sub-subject synthesis and a certain cognitive ability of the students, while the perspective of the study on the impact of the implementation of the subject of arts and sciences is extended from senior high school to university study. This paper, from the perspective of college study, examines the comprehensive influence of arts and sciences on students' academic achievement and attitude, and focuses on the following aspects:. The first part: literature review of relevant research, classification and detailed analysis of previous relevant research, to find out the useful points for the theory of the article. The second part: the statistical analysis and comparison of college students' professional courses, non-professional courses and college entrance examination scores of arts and science, reveals the correlation between the achievements of various subjects, and intuitively reflects the impact of arts and science on college students' studies. The third part: the questionnaire on the attitude of university teachers and students in the division of arts and science, aiming at the possible shortcomings of statistical analysis of data, to achieve the combination of subjective and objective, and to fully demonstrate the impact of the division of arts and science on the group of college students. The fourth part: point of view and understanding, combined with the above analysis and investigation, combined with their own theoretical thinking on the division of arts and science, put forward their own views and suggestions on the long-term dispute of the division of arts and science.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 何仕远;刘靖;张锡流;邓远美;;中医药院校文理科生源学习成绩对比分析研究[J];大众科技;2007年01期

2 彭彩霞;;清末民初课程“文实分科”的纷争及当代启示[J];河北师范大学学报(教育科学版);2010年03期

3 龙四古;;文理知识 科学精神 人文情怀——也谈高中文理分科问题[J];教学研究;2009年06期

4 刘宇;;论综合课程的社会学维度[J];吉林省教育学院学报;2008年03期

5 王洪席;;从“两种文化”冲突的视角看高中“文理分科”[J];教育导刊;2010年07期

6 康翠萍;;高中阶段不宜实行文理分科[J];教育研究;2009年04期

7 郝文武;;高中后期文理分科教学的合理性辩论[J];课程·教材·教法;2010年08期

8 高有华;综合课程发展史述评[J];南阳师范学院学报(社会科学版);2004年07期

9 向海英;幼儿记忆策略的操作效应和培养方法[J];山东师大学报(社会科学版);1997年04期

10 李叶峰;;利益相关者理论视阈下的高中文理分科[J];天津市教科院学报;2009年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 高岑;高中文理分科问题的研究[D];西南大学;2010年

本文编号：1675626