政策分析中价值判断与事实判断的冲突与权衡

发布时间：2018-09-05 17:53

【摘要】：政治家与政客在改革道路上多会形成激烈的政治冲突,原因在于难以调和与折中价值规范与事实规范的冲突。价值与事实二维分野的探讨,形成了哲学研究史上理性主义与经验主义两大学派的争论。中国政治学研究上存在着理想主义与现实主义两个流派,而经济学研究上也存在着两个流派,一方主张激进的经济改革,另一方主张渐进的经济改革。公共政策制定过程中高扬价值判断可能会造成政策的难以实现,即便是实现也有可能给社会和国家造成一定的破坏;同样,过于重视现实与世俗的物质考量,会导致社会风气的庸俗化。通过分析公共政策制定的结构和功能,折中价值判断与事实判断,运用历史学、知识社会学、政治学、经济学多元分析方法,可以打开中国公共政策分析的新视野。
[Abstract]:Politicians and politicians often form fierce political conflicts on the road of reform, because it is difficult to reconcile and compromise the conflict between value norms and factual norms. The discussion of the two-dimensional distinction between value and fact has formed a dispute between rationalism and empiricism in the history of philosophical research. There are two schools of idealism and realism in the study of Chinese political science, and there are two schools in the study of economics, one side advocates radical economic reform, the other side advocates progressive economic reform. Raising value judgments in the process of making public policies may make it difficult to achieve policies, and even realization may cause some damage to society and the country; similarly, too much attention should be paid to practical and secular material considerations. Will lead to vulgarization of social atmosphere. By analyzing the structure and function of public policy making, making a compromise between value judgment and fact judgment, and applying the methods of history, knowledge sociology, political science and economics, we can open a new vision of public policy analysis in China.
【作者单位】：中共湖州市委党校马列室;复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院;浙江社会科学院哲学所;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学基金项目《地方政府创新持续力影响研究》(10YJC810013)
【分类号】：G40-058.1

【参考文献】