课程评价的研究模式与鉴赏模式之比较研究

发布时间：2019-03-13 18:32

【摘要】：课程评价是课程开发、实施与教学活动的重要环节。开展有效的课程评价,有利于保障课程开发与课程设计的合理性。依据课程评价理念并选取课程评价方法建立起来的相对完整的评价体系则是课程的评价模式,对课程评价实施有着指导性作用。不同的评价模式,评价的思想、目的、方法各不相同。研究不同模式的异同之处对人们课程评价实践起到指导作用,也为开发新的评价模式提供依据。课程评价在历史发展的长河中,形成了多种多样的理论模式。20世纪70年代起,评价领域日渐繁荣,出现了一系列以批判泰勒目标模式为取向的课程评价模式,其中,英国和美国的课程评价颇具成果性和影响力。基于年代相近,本文选取了英国课程评价专家斯滕豪斯的研究模式和美国课程评价专家艾斯纳的鉴赏模式为代表进行对比研究。本文运用文献法、比较法,试图研究课程评价研究模式与鉴赏模式之间的异同点。研究模式由英国的斯滕豪斯所提出,斯滕豪斯认为“课程即研究”、“教师作为研究者”,研究是课程评价的本质；而美国的艾斯纳提出的鉴赏模式则认为评价应该像欣赏艺术,鉴别对象的独特特质。本文从价值取向、评价标准以及评价方法三个维度对研究模式与鉴赏模式进行对比研究,发现二者虽然在评价角度、评价方法方面有很多差异性,但是在评价理念、评价性质等方面有很多相似之处,甚至引领了评价领域的发展趋势,当然,这也是值得我国课程评价借鉴所用的。
[Abstract]:Curriculum evaluation is an important link in curriculum development, implementation and teaching activities. To carry out effective curriculum evaluation is helpful to ensure the rationality of curriculum development and curriculum design. A relatively complete evaluation system based on the concept of curriculum evaluation and the selection of curriculum evaluation methods is a model of curriculum evaluation, which has a guiding role in the implementation of curriculum evaluation. Different evaluation models, ideas, purposes, and methods are different. The research on the similarities and differences of different models plays a guiding role in the practice of curriculum evaluation and also provides a basis for the development of new evaluation models. Curriculum evaluation has formed a variety of theoretical models in the long history of development. Since the 1970s, the field of evaluation has become more and more prosperous, and a series of curriculum evaluation models have emerged, which are oriented towards criticizing Taylor's target model, among which, Curriculum evaluation in the United Kingdom and the United States is fruitful and influential. Based on the similarity of the age, this paper chooses the British curriculum evaluation expert Steinhaus research model and the American curriculum evaluation expert Eisner appreciation model as the representative to carry on the contrastive research. This paper attempts to study the similarities and differences between the model of curriculum evaluation and the mode of appreciation by means of literature and comparison. The research model was put forward by Stenhaus in England. Steinhaus thought that "curriculum is research" and "teacher is a researcher", which is the essence of curriculum evaluation. The appreciation model proposed by Eisner of the United States argues that evaluation should be like appreciating art and identifying the unique characteristics of the subject. This paper makes a comparative study of the research model and the appreciation model from the three dimensions of value orientation, evaluation criteria and evaluation method. It is found that although there are many differences in the evaluation angle and the evaluation method, but in the evaluation concept, the research model and the appreciation model are different from each other. There are many similarities in the nature of evaluation, and even lead the development trend in the field of evaluation. Of course, this is also worth using for reference in curriculum evaluation in our country.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G424

【参考文献】