蚌埠市大学生特质应对方式及相关因素研究

发布时间：2018-04-05 17:02

本文选题：社会支持　切入点：抑郁症　出处：《中华疾病控制杂志》2014年11期

【摘要】：目的探讨蚌埠市大学生积极和消极应对方式与各种因素之间的关系,以便更好的提高大学生心理健康水平。方法按照分层整群抽样方法,随机抽取了蚌埠市3所大学1 009名大学生,由统一培训合格的调查员对大学生进行无记名方式的现场问卷调查。结果大学生特质应对方式积极应对(positive coping style,PC)平均得分为(28.85±7.62)分,消极应对(negative coping style,NC)平均得分为(21.37±5.85)分,应对倾向分为(7.68±8.64)分,PC分与常模之间差异有统计学意义(t=-4.18,P=0.025);NC分与常模之间差异无统计学意义(t=0.44,P=0.635)。多元线性回归分析显示人际敏感因子,敌对因子、恐怖因子和社会支持总分对PC分有影响,差异均有统计学意义(均有P0.05);SCL-90总分、躯体化因子、焦虑因子、恐怖因子、生活事件总应激量、受惩罚因子和丧失因子对NC分有影响,差异均有统计学意义(均有P0.05)。结论大学生的特质应对方式受心理健康、生活事件等多种因素影响,可以从不同方面来预防和控制问题的产生。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the relationship between positive and negative coping styles and various factors among college students in Bengbu in order to improve their mental health.Methods according to stratified cluster sampling method, 1 009 college students from 3 universities in Bengbu were randomly selected.Results the average score of positive coping was 28.85 卤7.62, and the average score of negative coping was 21.37 卤5.85.There was significant difference between the PC score and the norm. There was no significant difference between the NC score and the normal norm. There was no significant difference between the NC score and the normal model.Multiple linear regression analysis showed that interpersonal sensitivity factor, hostility factor, phobic factor and total score of social support had significant effects on PC score (P 0.05), SCL-90 score, somatization factor, anxiety factor, phobic factor, and so on.The total stress amount of life events, penalty factor and loss factor had significant influence on NC score (P 0.05).Conclusion the trait coping style of college students is influenced by many factors, such as mental health, life events and so on, which can prevent and control the problems from different aspects.
【作者单位】：蚌埠医学院预防医学系;
【基金】：蚌埠医学院科研课题(Byky12103sk)
【分类号】：G444

【参考文献】