不同类型社会退缩儿童人际冲突应对策略的差异:个体为中心的分析

发布时间：2018-06-15 06:40

本文选题：羞怯 + 社交淡漠　；参考：《教育生物学杂志》2014年03期

【摘要】：目的考察不同类型社会退缩儿童人际冲突应对策略的差异。方法采用个体为中心的分析方法 ,使用羞怯量表、独处偏好量表、应对策略量表对2 072名3~8年级学生进行测量,并对不同类型社会退缩儿童人际冲突应对策略的得分进行组间比较。结果 1在寻求社会支持策略和问题解决策略上,三类社会退缩儿童均低于非退缩儿童,但三类儿童间不存在显著差异;2在内化应对策略上,社交回避儿童得分最高,其次为羞怯儿童和社交淡漠儿童,非退缩儿童得分最低;3在外化应对策略上,社交回避儿童得分最高,社交淡漠儿童其次,羞怯儿童第三,三者均高于非退缩儿童;4在回避应对策略上,社交回避和社交淡漠儿童得分最高,其次为羞怯儿童,非退缩儿童得分最低。结论与非退缩儿童相比,社会退缩儿童倾向采用消极的应对策略应对人际冲突,其中回避型社会退缩儿童的问题最为突出。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the differences of interpersonal conflict coping strategies among children with social withdrawal. Methods A total of 2 072 8 grade students were measured by using individual centered analysis, shyness scale, solitude preference scale and coping strategy scale. The scores of interpersonal conflict coping strategies of children with different social withdrawal were compared among groups. Results (1) in seeking social support strategies and problem-solving strategies, the social withdrawal children of the three groups were lower than those of the non-withdrawal children, but there was no significant difference among the three groups. 2 in the internalized coping strategies, the social avoidance children had the highest score. The children with shyness and social indifference scored the lowest. The children with social avoidance scored the highest, the children with social indifference and the children with shyness were the third, and the children with social avoidance had the highest scores in the externalization coping strategies. The scores of social avoidance and social indifference children were the highest, followed by shyness children, non-retreat children scored the lowest. Conclusion compared with non-withdrawal children, children with social withdrawal tend to use negative coping strategies to cope with interpersonal conflicts, among which the problem of children with social withdrawal of avoidance type is the most prominent.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学心理学系;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金(31300855) 上海市教委科研创新重点项目(14ZS112)
【分类号】：B844.1

【参考文献】