篮球运动与团体心理辅导对大学生人际交往能力干预效果

发布时间：2018-01-24 20:50

本文关键词： 篮球团体处理人际关系干预性研究学生　出处：《中国学校卫生》2017年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的了解篮球公选课教学与团体心理辅导对南京某高校大学生人际交往能力的干预效果,为大学生心理健康干预提供理论支持。方法选取南京某高校的632名篮球公选课在校大学生进行人际交往能力问卷和移情问卷调查,选取得分低于总分40%的68名大学生随机分为篮球公选课干预组、团体心理辅导组、联合干预组和对照组各17名进行2个月的干预,在干预后和2个月后再次采用相同问卷进行测试,并对结果进行比较分析。结果篮球公选课干预组、团体心理辅导组和联合干预组干预后自我评估各因子得分均高于干预前,差异均有统计学意义(P值均0.01)。篮球公选课干预组干预前与干预后2个月得分相比较在移情总分、认知移情、行为移情、适当拒绝、自我表达方面差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-3.231,-2.782,-3.452,-2.883,-3.146,P值均0.05)。团体心理辅导组干预前与干预后在情感移情、适当拒绝方面差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-3.825,-2.385,P值均0.05);干预前与干预后2个月相比较仅在主动交往方面相比较差异有统计学意义(t=-3.858,P0.05)。联合干预组干预前后相比较除了在主动交往、情感支持和人际关系敏感方面差异无统计学意义(P值均0.05)外,其他方面差异均有统计学意义(P值均0.05);干预前与干预后2个月结果相比较在行为移情、人际交往总分、主动交往、适当拒绝、自我表达方面差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-2.331,-2.101,-2.006,-2.488,-2.339,P值均0.05)。结论篮球公选课教学干预和团体心理辅导干预对某高校大学生的人际交往能力存在不同的干预效果,联合组干预效果优于单一模式。
[Abstract]:Objective to understand the effect of basketball elective course teaching and group psychological counseling on the interpersonal ability of college students in Nanjing. Methods A total of 632 college students in a university in Nanjing were investigated with interpersonal skills questionnaire and empathy questionnaire. Sixty-eight college students who scored less than 40% were randomly divided into four groups: intervention group, group psychological counseling group, combined intervention group and control group. The same questionnaire was used again after intervention and 2 months later, and the results were compared and analyzed. The scores of each factor of self-assessment after intervention in group counseling group and combined intervention group were higher than those before intervention. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The scores of the intervention group before and 2 months after the intervention were compared in the total score of empathy, cognitive empathy, behavioral empathy, appropriate rejection. The difference in self-expression was statistically significant (-3.231) -2.782 (-3.452) -2.883 (P < 0.05) -3.146 (P < 0.05). P values were 0.05. There were significant differences in emotional empathy and appropriate rejection before and after intervention in group psychological counseling group (-3.825- 2.385). P values were 0.05; There was only significant difference in active communication between before and 2 months after intervention. There was significant difference before and after intervention. The differences in emotional support and interpersonal sensitivity were not statistically significant (P = 0.05), but there were significant differences in other aspects (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in behavioral empathy, total score of interpersonal communication, active communication, appropriate rejection and self-expression between before and 2 months after intervention. -2.101U -2.006U -2.488U -2.339. Conclusion the teaching intervention of basketball public elective course and the intervention of group psychological guidance have different effects on the interpersonal ability of college students, and the intervention effect of the combined group is better than that of the single model.
【作者单位】：南京工业大学体育部;
【分类号】：G448
【正文快照】： 人际交往能力对在校大学生接触社会、适应社会,顺利走上工作岗位发挥着重要的作用,同时对个体建立社会支持发挥着重要影响[1-2]。多项研究显示,当前大学生的总体人际交往能力不断提高,但是依然有部分学生存在交往困惑的问题[3-5]。导致大学生出现人际交往障碍的原因较多,其中

【参考文献】