德育改革的伦理学视角

发布时间：2018-02-04 14:20

本文关键词： 德育伦理学情感主义理性主义中庸主义　出处：《全球教育展望》2017年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：德育改革总会出现不同的主张。德育改革的冲突背后隐含了情感主义与理性主义的伦理学分歧。情感主义伦理学强调德育的基础是个人的自然情感和个人的自然权利。立足于情感主义伦理学的德育改革重视个人的自然情感和自然权利的追求与满足。理性主义伦理学要么强调共同体的公共福祉要么重视个人的纯粹善良意志。理性主义伦理学主要适用于据乱世的德育意识形态;情感主义伦理学主要适用于太平世的德育意识形态。小康社会或升平世的德育往往选择中庸观念。中庸主义伦理学意味着既重视个人的自然情感和自然权利的满足,同时又强调以理制欲。
[Abstract]:There are always different opinions about moral education reform. Behind the conflict of moral education reform, there is an ethical difference between emotionalism and rationalism. Emotional ethics emphasizes that the foundation of moral education is the individual's natural emotion and the individual's nature. The moral education reform based on emotional ethics emphasizes the pursuit and satisfaction of individual natural emotion and natural rights. Rationalism ethics either emphasizes the public welfare of the community or attaches importance to the pure kindness of the individual. Rationalism ethics is mainly applicable to moral education ideology in times of chaos. The ethics of emotionalism is mainly applied to the ideology of moral education in the peaceful world. Moral education in a well-off society or in a prosperous society often chooses the concept of mean. Mediocre ethics means that both the natural emotion and the natural rights of the individual should be attached importance to. Foot. At the same time, it also emphasizes the desire of rationalism.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学课程与教学研究所;
【分类号】：G410
【正文快照】： 德育的起点是人性。符合人性的德育虽不见得一定就是好德育,但至少可以认为,没人性或反人性的德育一定是坏德育。德育改革宜顺应人的天性,同时又以理性节制人的自然欲望并由此显示出人的勇气。有人认为,中国哲学的基本立场是“情本体”,而西方哲学的主流是“理本体”。事实上,

【相似文献】