当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 教育体制论文 >

童年创伤对大学生恋爱满意度的影响:自尊与感知伴侣应答的序列中介作用

发布时间:2018-03-15 19:47

  本文选题:童年创伤经历 切入点:自尊 出处:《武汉体育学院》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:恋爱关系是大学生重要的人际关系,对恋爱满意度(简称关系满意度)的影响因素得到了研究者的广泛关注。童年创伤(经历)作为远端因素可以负向预测个体成年后的恋爱满意度,但是其作用机制还有待进一步探讨。感知伴侣应答是影响关系满意度关键的近端因素,在感知伴侣应答的影响因素里,自尊是备受关注的;而自尊作为自我评价的指标,又受到早期经历的影响。自尊是个体对自我价值的感受,既受到早期人际关系的影响,又影响当前的人际关系,是远端因素(童年创伤经历)和近端因素(感知伴侣应答)之间重要的中介变量。童年创伤经历会直接影响个体对自己的消极评价,形成负性的自我模式,而负性的自我认知会影响个体对后期人际关系及对他人的感知;而感知伴侣应答会直接影响个体关系满意度。关注童年创伤经历、自尊、感知伴侣应答与关系满意度之间的关系,既整合了远端因素和近端因素的研究,又可进一步探讨童年创伤经历与关系满意度之间关系的影响机制,更是对童年创伤经历与关系满意度这一研究领域的补充。该研究基于内部工作模型和自尊的社会计量器理论,旨在中国文化背景下,考察自尊和感知伴侣应答在童年创伤经历与恋爱满意度之间的中介作用。为此,该研究包括两个子研究:研究一:修订“一般感知应答问卷”。首先,翻译并回译问卷。其次,抽取809名有恋爱经历的预测被试及500名有恋爱经历的正式被试对预测问卷和修订后问卷进行预测和重测。对问卷进行探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析以及信效度检验。结果显示:感知应答问卷共包含13个项目,包含2个因子,其中,第一个因子包含5个项目,第二个因子包含8个项目,两个因子累计解释率为73.889%。验证性因素分析表明,该问卷具有良好的结构效度(第一次验证性因素分析结果:χ2=235.847,df=64,χ2/df=3.69,RMSEA=0.083,CFI=0.963,NFI=0.951;第二次验证性因素分析结果:χ2=237.697,df=64,χ2/df=3.714,RMSEA=0.075,CFI=0.963,NFI=0.951)。本研究中该问卷的Cronbach’sα系数为0.937,分半信度(Split-half)为0.814。研究二:考察童年创伤经历与恋爱满意度的关系及其影响机制。采用问卷法,对500名有恋爱经历的大学生的童年创伤经历、自尊、感知伴侣应答以及恋爱满意度进行施测,并采用SPSS23.0以及Hayes编制的SPSS宏(http://www.afhayes.com)对数据进行分析处理。结果显示:童年期创伤经历对恋爱满意度具有显著的负向预测作用(β=-0.270,p0.01);将童年期创伤经历与自尊、感知伴侣应答共同放入回归方程后,童年期创伤经历对恋爱满意度的预测作用依然显著(β=-0.096,p0.05);童年期创伤经历对自尊(β=-0.344,p0.01)和感知伴侣应答(β=-0.178,p0.01)均具有显著的负向预测作用;自尊对感知伴侣应答(β=0.247,p0.01)和恋爱满意度(β=0.139,p0.01)均具有显著的正向预测作用。自尊和感知伴侣应答在童年期创伤经历对恋爱满意度的影响中起部分中介作用,中介效应值为-0.174,占童年期创伤经历对恋爱满意度影响总效应(-0.270)的64.49%。具体来看,总的中介效应由以下三条路径产生的间接效应组成:通过童年期创伤经历→自尊→恋爱满意度的途径产生的中介效应,即间接效应1(-0.048);通过童年期创伤经历→自尊→感知伴侣应答→恋爱满意度的途径产生的中介效应,即间接效应2(-0.041);通过童年期创伤经历→感知伴侣应答→恋爱满意度的途径产生的中介效应,即间接效应3(-0.086)。三个间接效占总效应的百分比分别为17.72%、15.12%以及31.69%。综合研究一和研究二得出以下结论:(1)感知伴侣应答问卷具有良好的信度和效度,达到心理测量学的要求,可作为大学生感知伴侣应答的测量工具;(2)童年创伤经历可显著负向预测关系满意度、自尊和感知伴侣应答;(3)童年创伤经历通过自尊的独立中介作用负向预测恋爱满意度;(4)童年创伤经历通过自尊和感知伴侣应答的序列中介作用负向预测恋爱满意度;(5)童年创伤经历通过感知伴侣应答的独立中介作用负向预测恋爱满意度。
[Abstract]:The relationship is important for college students' interpersonal relationship, relationship satisfaction (referred to as relationship satisfaction factors) has received wide attention from researchers. Childhood trauma (experience) as the distal factors can negatively predict individual adult love satisfaction, but the mechanism remains to be further explored. Perceived response is proximal factors influence mate the relationship between the key factors in the satisfaction, perceived mate response, self-esteem is of concern; and self-esteem as a self evaluation index is influenced by early experiences. Self esteem is feeling of individual self value, not only by the early effects of interpersonal relationship, interpersonal relationship and influence factors (current, remote childhood trauma) and proximal factors (perceived partner response) between the important intermediary variables. Childhood trauma experience will have a direct impact on their individual negative evaluation, negative form The self model and negative self cognition will affect individual to later interpersonal relationship and perception of others; and the perception of partner responses will directly affect the individual relationship satisfaction. Focus on childhood traumatic experiences, self-esteem, the relationship between perceived partner response and relationship satisfaction, both the integration of the distal and proximal factors factors research and to further explore the influence mechanism of the relationship between childhood trauma and relationship satisfaction, it is a supplement to this research field of childhood trauma and relationship satisfaction. Based on the theory of social meter internal working model and self-esteem, to China cultural background, study the self-esteem and perceived partner response mediator between childhood trauma experience and love satisfaction. Therefore, this study includes two sub studies: on the revision of "general perception response questionnaire. First, translation and back translation. Volume. Secondly, the selected 809 predicted love experiences of subjects and 500 love experiences of formal subjects on the prediction questionnaire and revised questionnaire to predict and retest. Exploratory factor analysis of the questionnaire, confirmatory factor analysis and validity test. The results showed that perceived answer questionnaire includes 13 the project, which includes 2 factors, among them, the first factor consisted of 5 items, second factors including 8 items and two factors of the accumulated rate of 73.889%. confirmatory factor analysis showed that the questionnaire has good construct validity (the first confirmatory factor analysis results: X 2=235.847, df=64 x 2/df=3.69. RMSEA=0.083, CFI=0.963, NFI=0.951; second confirmatory factor analysis results: X 2=237.697, df=64 x 2/df=3.714, RMSEA=0.075, CFI=0.963, NFI=0.951). The questionnaire Cronbach 'alpha coefficient s in this study was 0.937, the split half reliability (Split-half) For the two 0.814. study: the effects of childhood trauma and its effect mechanism and relationship satisfaction. Using the method of questionnaire, the 500 love experiences of college students of childhood traumatic experiences, self-esteem, perceived partner responses and relationship satisfaction was measured, and using SPSS23.0 and Hayes prepared SPSS macro (http://www.afhayes.com) to analyze the data. The results showed that childhood trauma experience has a significant negative predictive effect on relationship satisfaction (beta =-0.270, P0.01); the self esteem and experience of childhood trauma, perceived partner into the regression equation of common response after trauma in childhood is still a significant predictor to relationship satisfaction (beta =-0.096, P0.05); childhood the traumatic experience of self-esteem (beta =-0.344, P0.01) and perceived partner response (beta =-0.178, P0.01) had significant negative predictive effect on self-esteem; perceived partner response (beta =0.247, P0.01 )鍜屾亱鐖辨弧鎰忓害(尾=0.139,p0.01)鍧囧叿鏈夋樉钁楃殑姝e悜棰勬祴浣滅敤.鑷皧鍜屾劅鐭ヤ即渚e簲绛斿湪绔ュ勾鏈熷垱浼ょ粡鍘嗗鎭嬬埍婊℃剰搴︾殑褰卞搷涓捣閮ㄥ垎涓粙浣滅敤,涓粙鏁堝簲鍊间负-0.174,鍗犵骞存湡鍒涗激缁忓巻瀵规亱鐖辨弧鎰忓害褰卞搷鎬绘晥搴,

本文编号:1616544

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/1616544.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户fb571***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com