高三学生专业未决应对策略量表的修编与应用

发布时间：2018-05-12 00:44

本文选题：高三学生 + 专业未决　；参考：《东北师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：根据生涯发展理论,16-18岁的高中生正处于职业发展的探索定向时期。然而我国生涯指导的缺失使我国高中生生涯规划能力薄弱,缺乏必要的职业选择能力。若能有效的引导高中生进行专业选择,则能够很好地减轻高中生专业选择的压力,促进身心健康发展。因此本研究旨在将国外成熟量表《职业未决应对策略》量表(Strategies for Coping with Career Indecision,简称SCCI),修编为适合我国高三学生的《高三学生专业未决应对策略》量表,并以此为工具了解我国高中生应对专业选择的现状,以期为高中生的生涯指导作参考。本研究通过对《职业未决应对策略》量表(SCCI)进行翻译、回译、初测、正式实测、检验信效度后,形成了由45个项目组成的正式量表,并以此为工具,调查了高三学生专业未决的现状。研究结果如下:(1)高三学生专业未决应对策略量表的信度在0.75-0.82之间,与校标呈显著性相关(p0.01),说明该量表适合应用于我国高三学生专业未决应对策略的测量和评估;(2)我国高三学生更倾向使用有效应对策略;(3)不同性别的高三学生在专业未决应对策略上有差异显著,且表现为女生在工具性信息搜集和工具性求助强于男生(p0.01),男生在自我调节和孤立的应对策略上强于女生(p0.05);(4)不同生源地的高三学生在专业未决应对策略上有差异显著,具体表现为来自城市的学生在问题分析力和适应性的应对策略上要显著强于来自农村学生(p0.05),而来自农村学生在委托他人和无助方面分数更高(p0.05);(5)在面对选专业时,感到的不同的压力(困难)程度在应对策略上存在显著差异。具体来说,在求助他人、委托他人以及无效应对上,高压力者(高困难程度者)得分显著高于低压力者(低困难程度者)(p0.001)。
[Abstract]:According to the theory of career development, high school students aged 16-18 are in the period of career development. However, the lack of career guidance in our country makes the ability of career planning of senior high school students weak and lack of necessary ability of career choice. If we can effectively guide high school students to choose their major, it can relieve the pressure of high school students' professional choice and promote the development of physical and mental health. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to revise the Foreign maturity scale "career pending coping Strategies" (for Coping with Career Indecision,) into the scale of "pending coping Strategies for Senior three students", which is suitable for senior three students in our country. Using this as a tool to understand the current situation of senior high school students' professional choice in China, in order to provide reference for senior high school students' career guidance. In this study, a formal scale consisting of 45 items was formed through translation, first test, formal measurement, reliability and validity of the "career unresolved coping Strategies" scale (SCCII), which was used as a tool. This paper investigates the current situation of the pending major of senior three students. The results of the study are as follows: (1) the reliability of the coping Strategy scale for Senior three students is between 0.75-0.82. A significant correlation was found between the scale and the school standard, indicating that the scale is suitable for the measurement and evaluation of pending coping strategies for senior three students in China. (2) Senior 3 students in China are more likely to use effective coping strategies. There are significant differences in industry pending coping strategies, The results showed that female students were stronger in instrumental information collection and instrumental help than boys in self-regulation and isolated coping strategies. There were significant differences in pending coping strategies among senior high school students from different places. This shows that students from cities have significantly better coping strategies for problem analysis and adaptability than students from rural areas, while students from rural areas have higher scores in terms of entrustment and helplessness.) when facing with the choice of major, students from rural areas have higher scores in terms of entrustment and helplessness. There were significant differences in coping strategies between different levels of stress (difficulty). Specifically, the score of high stress group (high difficulty group) was significantly higher than that of low pressure group (low difficulty group) in terms of asking for help, entrusting others, and ineffective coping.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】