生涯未决应对策略问卷中文版在中国大学生中的信-效度检验

发布时间：2018-05-29 00:14

本文选题：生涯未决应对策略 + 信度　；参考：《中国临床心理学杂志》2017年04期

【摘要】：目的:检验生涯未决应对策略问卷(Strategies for Coping with Career Indecision Questionnaire,SCCI)在中国大学生群体中的信度和效度。方法:采用SCCI中文版、生涯决策量表、生涯决策困难问卷和问题取向应对风格量表对1354名大学生进行施测,其中后三个量表用于检验效标关联效度。两周后随机抽取105名大学生进行重测。结果:修订后的SCCI中文版共43道题,包括有效应对、寻求支持和无效应对三个二阶因子和十三个一阶因子;问卷的拟合指数为:χ~2=3673.551,df=725,RMSEA=0.055,CFI=0.872,TLI=0.863,SRMR=0.074;三个二阶因子的内部一致性信度分别为0.91、0.87和0.86,重测信度分别为0.78、0.82和0.76;SCCI具有良好的效标关联效度。结论:修订后的SCCI中文版具有较好的信度和效度,适宜在中国大学生群体中使用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to test the reliability and validity of Strategies for Coping with Career Indecision questionnaire in Chinese college students. Methods: 1354 college students were tested with the Chinese version of SCCI, career decision scale, career Decision-Making difficulty questionnaire and question orientation coping style scale, among which the latter three scales were used to test the validity of validity criteria. Two weeks later, 105 college students were randomly selected for retest. Results: the revised Chinese version of SCCI consists of 43 questions, including three second-order factors and thirteen first-order factors, including effective coping, seeking support and ineffective coping; The fitting index of the questionnaire was: 蠂 ~ 2 3673.551 ~ 725 RMSEAA 0.055 CFI 0.872TLI 0.863N SRMR-0.074, the internal consistency reliability of the three second-order factors were 0.91-0.87 and 0.86, and the test-retest reliability were 0.780.82 and 0.76 SCCI, respectively. Conclusion: the revised Chinese version of SCCI has good reliability and validity and is suitable for use in Chinese college students.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学心理学院;耶路撒冷希伯来大学;
【基金】：北京师范大学大学自主科研基金项目(SKZZY2014054) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助
【分类号】：G444

【相似文献】