澳大利亚“合作问题解决在线评估”项目研究——基于ECD模型的“概念评估框架”的分析
发布时间:2018-10-08 10:35
【摘要】:PISA2015测试首次引入了"合作问题解决"测验项目,受此影响,澳大利亚专门开发了"合作问题解决在线评估与澳大利亚课程项目"。为深入了解这一项目的设计运作过程、存在问题及多方评价情况,引入了ECD模型中的概念评估框架作为分析视角:该项目以批判与创新思维、人际社交技能为学生模式变量,以五级评分量表为证据规则,以四项互动任务为测试材料,以计算机在线平台为呈现形式,各个模式协同运转共同致力于评估目的的实现。从试测结果来看,得到了学校、教师、学生的多方支持与认可。但依然存在如技术、计时及配对等多个亟待解决的问题。
[Abstract]:The PISA2015 test introduced the "cooperative problem-solving" test for the first time. As a result, Australia has developed the online Evaluation of Cooperative problem solving and the Australian Curriculum Program. In order to deeply understand the design and operation process of the project, there are some problems and evaluation conditions. The conceptual evaluation framework in the ECD model is introduced as the perspective of analysis. The project takes critical and innovative thinking, interpersonal and social skills as student model variables. With the five-level rating scale as the evidence rule, the four interactive tasks as the test materials and the computer online platform as the presentation form, each mode works together to achieve the purpose of evaluation. From the test results, the school, teachers, students support and recognition. However, there are still many problems to be solved, such as technology, timing and pairing.
【作者单位】: 北京师范大学国际与比较教育研究院;
【分类号】:G561.1
本文编号:2256451
[Abstract]:The PISA2015 test introduced the "cooperative problem-solving" test for the first time. As a result, Australia has developed the online Evaluation of Cooperative problem solving and the Australian Curriculum Program. In order to deeply understand the design and operation process of the project, there are some problems and evaluation conditions. The conceptual evaluation framework in the ECD model is introduced as the perspective of analysis. The project takes critical and innovative thinking, interpersonal and social skills as student model variables. With the five-level rating scale as the evidence rule, the four interactive tasks as the test materials and the computer online platform as the presentation form, each mode works together to achieve the purpose of evaluation. From the test results, the school, teachers, students support and recognition. However, there are still many problems to be solved, such as technology, timing and pairing.
【作者单位】: 北京师范大学国际与比较教育研究院;
【分类号】:G561.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 柏毅;吕泽恩;;美国教育评估系统的ECD模型[J];教育测量与评价(理论版);2016年01期
2 冯翠典;;“以证据为中心”的教育评价设计模式简介[J];上海教育科研;2012年08期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 江夏;张世义;;世界银行教师政策框架结构、特点及启示[J];外国中小学教育;2017年04期
2 李廷洲;焦楠;陆莎;;“十二五”期间我国教师政策计量分析与前瞻——基于政策工具视角的文本计量研究[J];中国教育学刊;2016年09期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 冯翠典;;“以证据为中心”的教育评价设计模式简介[J];上海教育科研;2012年08期
2 乔辉;;基于证据的考试设计理念(ECD)介绍[J];中国考试(研究版);2007年12期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 李萍;;基于Struts+Spring+Hibernate教学在线评估平台的设计与实现[J];运城学院学报;2008年05期
2 马勇;;知己知彼助力创业[J];神州学人;2014年03期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 张建一;;欧洲冷库能效在线评估研究及其分析[A];第五届全国冷冻冷藏产业(科技、管理、营销)创新发展年会论文集[C];2013年
2 沈德武;刘华;马玲玲;;在线评估自动控制系统研究与实践[A];中国烟草学会2006年学术年会论文集[C];2007年
,本文编号:2256451
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2256451.html