不同来源的预期情绪对青少年公平决策的影响
文内图片:
图片说明:不同行为情境和预期情绪下被试的分配均值图
[Abstract]:In the daily life, the distribution behavior is more and more common. The research of the laboratory also involves the distribution behavior. In recent decades, the behavior economists believe that the distribution behavior of the human is not completely self-interest, the pursuit of equity is the social value orientation of the progress, and the untiring pursuit in the human history. In behavioral economics, emotion is thought to play an important role in the allocation of decision-making. In the past, the research on the influence of emotion on the distribution decision-making mainly focuses on the influence of the emotion and the emotion on the individual's fair behavior and the sense of fairness, and the relationship between the expected emotion and the fair behavior is seldom studied, and, Most of the study's fair types include only the fair and the unfair, and the lower-general unfair behavior is divided into whether to be more unfair to himself or the other party. Therefore, this study uses the ultimatum game paradigm as the basic task for high school students, and uses two different expected emotion-inducing methods to explore the relationship between the expected emotion and the fair decision-making in different behavior situations. The study included two experiments designed to explore whether the expected mood would have an impact on fair decision-making, and whether the impact would be specific to the different sources of the expected mood. In this paper, an ultimatum game model is used to explore whether the expected emotion derived from self-imagination can affect the individual's distribution behavior, and the experiment 2 uses the same experimental paradigm to explore the effect of the expected emotion generated by other people on the individual's distribution behavior. Through the research of the above two experiments, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) The distribution behavior of the young people in China is basically fair, does not accord with the assumption of the full economic person, and there is no gender difference; (2) compared with the test that the fair performance is expected to regret, it is expected that a pleasant test will be given to the responder for more money; the expected feeling of unfairness of the self-interest is expected to be less than the amount that is expected to be less than expected to be given to the responder; (3) Other people, after the fair distribution, show that the regret is less than that of the person who is being tried to be allocated to the responder; others feel that the regret ratio after the fair distribution of the others will make the trial be allocated more amount to the responder; Other people show pleasure than performance after he's not fair, and it will make the trial allocate more money to the responder.
【学位授予单位】:江西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B844.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李占星;朱莉琪;;不同情境中情绪预期对青少年道德决策的影响[J];心理科学;2015年06期
2 孔晨;于洪鉴;陈艳;;过度自信、预期后悔情绪与国有企业高管职务舞弊行为的实验研究[J];中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版);2015年06期
3 谭玲;夏天生;刘勇;;不同博弈情境下社会排斥对社会决策的影响作用[J];心理科学;2015年04期
4 王芹;白学军;李士一;;情绪背景和社会预期对社会经济决策行为的影响[J];心理与行为研究;2015年02期
5 梁福成;王心怡;唐卫海;;提议者的意图、相对收益与绝对收益对不同年龄回应者公平行为的影响[J];心理学报;2015年03期
6 陈晓霄;;大学生负性情绪调节预期、负性生活事件与状态焦虑的关系[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2015年02期
7 杨丽珠;;中国儿童青少年人格发展与培养研究三十年[J];心理发展与教育;2015年01期
8 冯莹;甘怡群;柳之啸;聂晗颖;陈炜夷;;不确定性反应风格和未来取向应对的关系探究:预期情绪的中介作用[J];北京大学学报(自然科学版);2015年03期
9 王益文;张振;张蔚;黄亮;郭丰波;原胜;;群体身份调节最后通牒博弈的公平关注[J];心理学报;2014年12期
10 苏彦捷;马天舒;;孤独症儿童的公平决策:心理理论和自我/他人情绪识别的作用[J];心理科学;2014年04期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 洪慧芳;;不同社会价值取向者在利益冲突情境中的行为决策及公平感体验[A];北京市社会心理学会2007年学术年会论文摘要集[C];2007年
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 王艳;道德两难决策权衡的认知行为与ERP研究[D];大连理工大学;2013年
2 王芹;即时情绪对社会决策影响的发展研究[D];天津师范大学;2010年
3 赵立军;框架效应与公平判断[D];华东师范大学;2010年
4 方学梅;基于情绪的公正感研究[D];华东师范大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 曹玺勇;获益或损失情景下社会比较对公平决策影响的ERPs研究[D];暨南大学;2015年
2 余萍;负性情绪对不公平情境下决策的影响[D];湖南师范大学;2015年
3 余巧玲;4-6岁学龄前儿童公平行为和公平意图的发展研究[D];江西师范大学;2014年
4 李海军;决策框架和参照点对公平判断的影响研究[D];华中师范大学;2014年
5 丁毅;公平加工中主体间的不对称性效应及其机制[D];西南大学;2014年
6 高宏佳;5-9岁儿童在最后通牒任务中博弈策略的发展及其影响因素研究[D];西南大学;2014年
7 魏真瑜;最后通牒博弈中的从众效应[D];西南大学;2014年
8 周捚;初中生内疚情绪体验的发展及其对公平行为的影响[D];苏州大学;2013年
9 陈梦荷;公平判断的影响因素研究[D];华东师范大学;2013年
10 张艳娟;关系类型对儿童不公平厌恶的影响[D];辽宁师范大学;2013年
,本文编号:2511701
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2511701.html