工程教育评估与认证及其思考

发布时间：2018-02-02 18:20

本文关键词： 教育评估工程教育认证基于结果的教育复杂工程问题大学基本功能　出处：《高等工程教育研究》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文讨论工程教育评估与认证的三个问题。第一部分首先对评估作了分类。大类如:认可评估、认证评估与社会评估。不同类型的评估有不同的目标与用途,因而有不同的评估指标体系和各指标对应的不同的权重。对于针对教育质量保证、学术研究、管理问责和向社会提供信息的不同类别的需求,必须使用相应类别的评估标准。当前尤其应注意区分教育评估与学术评估。两者评估目的不同,不可错用学术评估的标准来进行工程教育评估。第二部分是本文研究讨论的重点,即工程教育评估的理念及其实施的难点。工程教育评估是不同于认可评估和社会评估的不同类别的评估。论述了工程教育评估的基本理念:基于学生学习结果的评估和持续的质量改进。在多样性维度空间内达到教育质量基本门槛的要求。而在其实施过程中要重点解决三个问题:转变教学观念,针对复杂工程问题组织培养过程,注重工程伦理的教育。第三部分分析了工程教育评估的策略。指出从分层评估向基于分类评估的的分层评估的演化发展的大趋势。文末从反思的角度叩问大学育人的基本功能,期望回答本文开始提出的问题:什么是本真意义上的工程教育评估。指出对大学基本功能理解的任何偏差,都可能引致工程教育评估偏离正确的方向。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses three problems of engineering education evaluation and certification. The first part classifies the evaluation. For example, recognition assessment, certification evaluation and social assessment. Different types of evaluation have different objectives and uses. As a result, there are different evaluation index systems and different weights corresponding to each index. There are different types of needs for quality assurance of education, academic research, management accountability and information to the community. It is important to use the corresponding assessment criteria. Special attention should be paid at present to distinguish between educational and academic assessments, which have different purposes. The evaluation of engineering education should not be carried out by the standard of academic evaluation. The second part is the focus of this study. That is, the concept of engineering education evaluation and the difficulties in its implementation. Engineering education evaluation is different from the approved assessment and social assessment. The basic concept of engineering education evaluation is discussed. Based on the evaluation of students' learning results and continuous quality improvement, we should meet the requirements of the basic threshold of educational quality in the space of diversity. In the process of implementation, we should focus on solving three problems: changing teaching concepts. Tissue culture process for complex engineering problems. The third part analyzes the strategy of engineering education evaluation, points out the trend of evolution from stratified assessment to stratified assessment based on classification evaluation. At the end of the paper, the author inquires into university education from the perspective of reflection. Basic functions of human beings. It is expected to answer the question raised at the beginning of this paper: what is the evaluation of engineering education in the true sense? it is pointed out that any deviation in the understanding of the basic functions of the university may lead to the deviation from the correct direction of the evaluation of engineering education.
【分类号】：G642;TB1-4
【正文快照】： 一、关于教育评估与认证当我们讨论工程教育的质量保证及其相关的评估与认证时,必然直面一个困难而重要的问题:什么是真正意义上的工程教育评估?评估的目的是什么?主导工程教育评估的教育价值观念是什么?这些看似易于清楚回答的问题,却需仔细分析方能找出其真实的答案。许多具

【参考文献】