我国高校系主任角色冲突问题的实证研究

发布时间：2018-03-28 23:20

本文选题：系科　切入点：系主任　出处：《南昌大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：系主任作为高校基层管理者中的一员,既是高校学术管理岗位的中心,也是行政管理岗位的中心,处于组织结构中的中心位置,他的角色扮演影响着高校的管理水平。同时,系主任作为学科的带头人,他的学术水平,求异、创新能力影响着高校的学术和办学水平。随着高校的不断扩招,高校的组织结构变得越来越复杂,功能变得越来越繁琐,对系主任有越来越多的角色要求和期望。行政权力和学术权力的角色要求和期望都影响着系主任的角色扮演行为,容易引发系主任的角色冲突。本文运用了角色理论对我国高校系主任进行系统的探讨。论文在对系主任角色冲突相关概念进行科学界定的基础上,运用角色理论对我国高校系主任的角色冲突进行分析,并采用定量和定性相结合的研究方式对我国高校系主任这一角色的角色冲突进行实证研究。对我国高校系主任的角色行为和角色职责进行因子分析,再对我国高校系主任进行个体特征差异分析以及学校特征差异分析,得出系主任角色冲突的表现。通过对角色冲突表现的探讨,分析出系主任角色冲突所产生的积极与消极效应,同时结合对美国高校系主任的角色分析,得出本文的结论,并根据所得的结论得出相应的解决策略。
[Abstract]:As one of the basic administrators in colleges and universities, the head of the department is not only the center of academic management post, but also the center of administrative post, and is in the central position in the organizational structure. His role plays an important role in influencing the management level of the university. As the leader of the discipline, the academic level, the ability to seek difference and the innovation ability of the head of the department affect the academic and school running level of the university. With the continuous expansion of the enrollment in the university, the organizational structure of the university becomes more and more complex and the function becomes more and more complicated. There are more and more demands and expectations on the role of the dean of the department. The role requirements and expectations of the executive and academic powers affect the role-playing behavior of the dean. It is easy to lead to the role conflict of the head of the department. This paper uses the role theory to discuss the department head of our country systematically. On the basis of the scientific definition of the concept of the conflict of the role of the head of the department, the paper makes a scientific definition of the concept of the conflict. Based on the role theory, this paper analyzes the role conflict of the heads of colleges and universities in China. The role conflict of the head of university department in our country is studied empirically by the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The factor analysis of the role behavior and role responsibility of the head of college department in our country is carried out. Through the analysis of the differences of individual characteristics and school characteristics of the heads of departments of colleges and universities in our country, the author draws the conclusion that the performance of the conflict of the roles of the heads of the departments, through the discussion of the performance of the conflict of roles, This paper analyzes the positive and negative effects of the conflict between the head of the department and the role of the head of the department in the United States, and draws the conclusion of this paper, and puts forward the corresponding solutions according to the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G647

【参考文献】