中医学本科生能力评价体系的完善

发布时间：2018-04-24 14:58

  本文选题：中医人才培养 + 能力结构　； 参考：《山东中医药大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：目的：分析中医学本科生能力结构，修订中医学本科生能力自评问卷，进一步构建和完善中医学本科生评价体系。 方法：以《中国·中医学本科教育标准》对中医学本科生知识、技能和思想道德和素质三方面的要求为基础，通过文献综述和以往对能力的研究修订中医学本科生的能力要素，采用问卷调查的方式，进一步分析中医学本科生的能力结构。 结果：用于中医学本科生能力自我评价的三个分量表都是由五个因素组成的，问卷的总体信度及各分量表的总体信度都在0.9左右，各因素的信度在0.7-0.9之间；用于中医学本科生能力客观问卷经过筛选，总体难度在中等范围之内。两问卷之间以及问卷与各分量表的相关性显著。 结论：中医学本科生能力评价体系由主观评价和客观评价两部分组成，其中主观评价部分由三个分量表组成，每个分量表都由五个因素构成，且评分标准为1-4级评分标准；客观评价由客观题和主观题两部分组成。经信效度和相关性分析表明，主观自评问卷有很好的信效度，客观问卷能够很好的验证主观问卷。
[Abstract]:Objective: to analyze the ability structure of undergraduates of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), revise the self-assessment questionnaire of ability of TCM undergraduates, and further construct and perfect the evaluation system of undergraduates of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Methods: based on the requirements of Chinese traditional Medicine undergraduate Education Standards in three aspects: knowledge, skill, ideology, morality and quality, the ability factors of Chinese medicine undergraduates were revised through literature review and previous research on competence. A questionnaire survey was used to further analyze the ability structure of undergraduates in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Results: the three subscales for ability self-evaluation of Chinese medicine undergraduates were all composed of five factors. The total reliability of the questionnaire and the total reliability of each subscale were about 0.9, and the reliability of each factor was between 0.7-0.9. The objective questionnaire for the ability of Chinese medicine undergraduates was screened, and the overall difficulty was within the middle range. The correlation between the two questionnaires and between the questionnaires and the subscales was significant. Conclusion: the ability evaluation system of Chinese medicine undergraduates is composed of subjective evaluation and objective evaluation. The subjective evaluation is composed of three subscales, each of which is composed of five factors, and the scoring standard is 1-4 grade. Objective evaluation consists of objective questions and subjective questions. The reliability and validity analysis showed that the subjective self-assessment questionnaire had good reliability and validity, and the objective questionnaire could well verify the subjective questionnaire.
【学位授予单位】：山东中医药大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：R-4;G642

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李勇;王德蒇;;四川中医专业本科毕业生临床能力和岗位适应性的调查分析[J];成都中医药大学学报(教育科学版);2010年03期

2 陈惠珍;李亚真;蔡建鹰;;中医学生批判性思维能力现状调查分析[J];成都中医药大学学报(教育科学版);2011年04期

3 张毅,秦明,段渠,李春,公照明;关于中医本科生临床能力的调查报告[J];成都中医药大学学报;1997年01期

4 李李;;剪纸课程与中医院校人文素质培养[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2012年09期

5 范涌峰;刘梅;;认知心理学学习理论对儿童口语交际能力培养的启示[J];太原师范学院学报(社会科学版);2010年06期

6 江蓉星;谭漪;刘佳玲;;中医学生临床工作能力培养与考核的思考[J];成都中医药大学学报(教育科学版);2000年02期

7 方群;中医学专业临床能力考核方案探讨[J];福建中医学院学报;2000年02期

8 吴晓义;杜晓颖;;能力概念的多维透视[J];吉林工程技术师范学院学报;2006年04期

9 王钢;;师范生专业实践能力的培养——基于现代认知心理学的视角[J];江苏教育研究;2010年22期

10 阎建平,王美兰;广义智力论[J];教育理论与实践;2004年09期

，

本文编号：1797119