审核评估方案的结构框架及实施基础研究

发布时间：2018-06-14 00:20

本文选题：审核评估 + 评估方案　；参考：《大连理工大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：高等教育评估发展至今,已形成院校评估、专业认证、质量审核、综合排名等多元化评估模式。在严把高等教育质量关,实行高校分类管理,鼓励高校特色办学的高等教育宏观管理政策指导下,教育评估体如何现国家质量意志,尊重学校自我管理,维护各方教育利益,是值得关注的问题。各类评估模式存在目标适切性差异,因此,实施高等教育分类评估,模式恰当,有的放矢,对于发挥学校主观能动性,实现评估合作关系,维护和提高高等教育质量都有积极意义。通过对高等教育评估模式及质量保证国内外现状的文献研究,本文认为各国审核评估以高等教育质量保证体系为核心,重视过程,突出高校自我管理与改进,具有方案灵活性强,维护学校自治,社会参与度高的特点。实施合格评估与质量审核相结合的院校评估,既有利于保障新建院校的基本办学资质,又有利于鼓励合格院校发挥优势,办出特色。因此,审核评估方案及其基础性实施条件具有重要的研究价值。本文从组织管理、审核范围、审核过程、审核后续等几个主要方面对英国和新西兰最新院校审核方案进行了全面深入的对比研究,认为英国审核评估强调教育机构公信力,重视学生意见,以审核结果为依据实现质量问责；新西兰审核评估重视学校自主权,接受社会监督,元评估机制完善,并得出两国质量体系特色化、社会参与多元化、质量信息透明化的共同特征。根据我国新一轮高等教育评估对审核模式的迫切需求,立足国情,汲取经验,本文认为应从审核目标、组织管理、审核范围、审核程序等主要方面搭建我国审核评估的方案框架,做到关注质量保证,建立合作关系,突出办学特色,完善考察流程。方案的实施需要内外部质量体系的通力配合,政策环境是基础,评估文化是条件,质量保证是核心。在指导院校审核,促进质量改进方面,欧洲高等教育区质量保证的系统化标准和制度化管理走在了世界的前列,其内外部质量保证标准和元评估标准构成了完整的标准体系。本文以欧洲高等教育区质量保证标准为案例进行研究,认为该标准体系重视各层次质量政策与流程,尊重学校发展愿景,强调评估机构资质,推广质量信息系统,努力实现欧洲层面质量保证体系互认,经验共享,并提出深化质量政策与质量意识,完善内外部质量保证标准,建立审核评估元评估制度的相关建议,为审核评估的实施夯实基础,建立思路。
[Abstract]:So far, the evaluation of higher education has formed a diversified evaluation model, such as college evaluation, professional certification, quality audit, comprehensive ranking and so on. Under the guidance of the macro management policy of strictly controlling the quality of higher education, carrying out the classified management of higher education and encouraging the universities to run schools with characteristics, the educational evaluation body shows the national quality will, respects the self-management of the schools, and maintains the educational interests of all sides. It is a matter of concern. Therefore, the implementation of higher education classification evaluation, the model is appropriate, targeted, to give play to the subjective initiative of the school, to achieve evaluation cooperation, It is of positive significance to maintain and improve the quality of higher education. Through the literature research on the evaluation mode of higher education and the current situation of quality assurance at home and abroad, this paper holds that the audit and evaluation of various countries take the quality assurance system of higher education as the core, attach importance to the process, and highlight the self-management and improvement of colleges and universities. Has the plan flexibility strong, maintains the school autonomy, the social participation degree high characteristic. The combination of qualified assessment and quality audit is not only conducive to ensuring the basic qualifications of new colleges, but also conducive to encouraging qualified colleges and universities to bring their advantages into full play and create their own characteristics. Therefore, the audit evaluation program and its basic implementation conditions have important research value. This paper makes a comprehensive and in-depth comparative study of the audit schemes of the latest institutions in the UK and New Zealand from the aspects of organizational management, audit scope, audit process, audit follow-up, and so on. It is considered that the British audit evaluation emphasizes the credibility of educational institutions. Pay attention to students' opinions and realize quality accountability on the basis of audit results. New Zealand audit and evaluation emphasizes school autonomy, accepts social supervision, improves meta-evaluation mechanism, and draws a conclusion that the quality system of the two countries is characterized and social participation is diversified. Common features of quality information transparency. According to the urgent needs of the new round of higher education evaluation in our country, based on the national conditions and learning experience, this paper holds that the audit target, organization, management and audit scope should be taken into account. The main aspects of audit procedure are to set up the framework of our country's audit and evaluation, to pay attention to the quality assurance, to establish the cooperative relationship, to highlight the characteristics of running a school, and to perfect the inspection process. The implementation of the scheme needs the cooperation of internal and external quality system, the policy environment is the basis, the evaluation culture is the condition, and the quality assurance is the core. In the aspect of guiding college audit and promoting quality improvement, the systematic standards and systematized management of quality assurance in European higher education area are in the forefront of the world, and their internal and external quality assurance standards and meta-evaluation standards constitute a complete standard system. This paper takes the quality assurance standard of European higher education area as a case study, and thinks that the standard system attaches importance to the quality policy and process at all levels, respects the school development vision, emphasizes the evaluation of institutional qualification, and promotes the quality information system. To realize the mutual recognition and experience sharing of quality assurance system at the European level, and put forward some suggestions on deepening quality policy and quality awareness, perfecting internal and external quality assurance standards, and establishing audit and evaluation meta-evaluation system. In order to audit and evaluate the implementation of tamping the foundation, the establishment of ideas.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：G649.1

【参考文献】