公立高校去行政化的困境与出路
发布时间：2018-07-15 19:10
【摘要】：我国高等教育在规模上已经跃居为世界第一,但高等教育质量却较低。导致我国高等教育质量低下的原因有多方面,但高校特别是公立高校的行政化是我国整体高等教育质量低下的重要原因之一。公立高校去行政化是提升我国高等教育质量的重要途径之一。 我国公立高校行政化的外部表现为：公立高校的设置及管理严格按照行政级别划分,公立高校领导由各上级主管部门指定,上级主管部门直接干预公立高校的岗位设置制度。内部表现为：一是公立高校行政化色彩浓厚。二是校内资源配置行政化。校内资源配置完全受制于行政权力,学校的财力资源首先满足于拥有行政权力的学校领导所负责的学科、专业,课题申报,基地申报、职称评定等毫无疑问地向这些拥有行政权力的学者倾斜,行政化波及到学生。公立高校行政化的危害主要表现为：导致中央及地方政府和公立高校财力资源的极大浪费,导致教育腐败。教育质量低下。 从教育产权的角度,导致我国公立高校行政化的原因主要是：公立高校产权主体单一性,公立高校所有权安排的不合理。严重忽视了人力资本产权的建立和完善,激励不足与“内部人控制”问题比较严重。我国公立高校去行政化的困境主要包括：对于去行政化的必要性和措施认识的观念困境,缺乏法律法规保障的制度困境,以及缺乏分类指导的操作困境。 公立高校去行政化的路径选择,首先是统一对去行政化的必要性等方面的统一认识,完善以大学自治、教授治学、学术自由和学生自治为核心内容的现代大学制度,以及通过广泛宣传、修订和完善《高等教育法》,制定《公立高校大学章程》,规范公立高校招生管理制度,将招生管理权限下放到院系一级,由院系上报招生指标,并负责招生,取消招生办公室。改革工资制度和资源分配制度,对于高校管理者和教师实行年薪制,中央和地方财政划拨的教育经费到学校后,统一打包到院系,由院系自行决定分配,充分照顾学校所有专业、学科的均衡发展,减少资源浪费,提高资源利用效率。
[Abstract]:China's higher education has ranked first in the world in scale, but the quality of higher education is low. There are many reasons leading to the low quality of higher education in our country, but the administration of colleges and universities, especially the public universities, is one of the important reasons for the low quality of higher education in our country as a whole. De-administration of public colleges and universities is one of the important ways to improve the quality of higher education in China. The external manifestations of our country's public universities are as follows: the establishment and management of public universities are strictly divided according to the administrative levels, the leaders of public colleges and universities are appointed by the competent departments at higher levels, and the higher authorities directly interfere in the post setting system of public colleges and universities. The internal performance is: first, the public university administration color is strong. The allocation of school resources is completely restricted by the administrative power. The financial resources of the school are first satisfied with the discipline, specialty, subject declaration, and base application of the school leader who has the administrative power. There is no doubt that the evaluation of professional titles is inclined to these scholars who have administrative power, which affects students. The harm of the administration of public colleges and universities is as follows: leading to the waste of the financial resources of the central and local governments and public universities and leading to the corruption of education. The quality of education is low. From the point of view of educational property rights, the main reasons leading to the administration of public universities in our country are: the singularity of property rights of public colleges and universities, and the unreasonable arrangement of ownership of public colleges and universities. The establishment and perfection of the property right of human capital have been neglected seriously, and the problem of insufficient incentive and the problem of "insider control" is more serious. The predicament of deadministration of public universities in our country mainly includes: the concept dilemma of understanding the necessity and measure of deadministration, the system predicament of lacking the guarantee of laws and regulations, and the operational dilemma of lacking classification guidance. First of all, we should unify the unified understanding of the necessity of deadministration, and perfect the modern university system with the core contents of university autonomy, academic freedom, academic freedom and student autonomy. And through extensive publicity, revision and improvement of the higher Education Law, formulation of the articles of Association of Public Colleges and Universities, standardization of the admission management system of public colleges and universities, devolution of admission management authority to the first level of the colleges and departments, reporting of enrollment targets by the departments and departments, and responsible for recruiting students, Cancel the admissions office. To reform the wage system and the system of resource allocation, to implement an annual salary system for university administrators and teachers, and once the educational funds allocated by the central and local governments have been allocated to schools, they shall be uniformly packaged into faculties and departments, which shall be allocated at their own discretion. Fully take care of all major, the balanced development of discipline, reduce the waste of resources and improve the efficiency of resource utilization.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：G647
本文编号：2125100
[Abstract]:China's higher education has ranked first in the world in scale, but the quality of higher education is low. There are many reasons leading to the low quality of higher education in our country, but the administration of colleges and universities, especially the public universities, is one of the important reasons for the low quality of higher education in our country as a whole. De-administration of public colleges and universities is one of the important ways to improve the quality of higher education in China. The external manifestations of our country's public universities are as follows: the establishment and management of public universities are strictly divided according to the administrative levels, the leaders of public colleges and universities are appointed by the competent departments at higher levels, and the higher authorities directly interfere in the post setting system of public colleges and universities. The internal performance is: first, the public university administration color is strong. The allocation of school resources is completely restricted by the administrative power. The financial resources of the school are first satisfied with the discipline, specialty, subject declaration, and base application of the school leader who has the administrative power. There is no doubt that the evaluation of professional titles is inclined to these scholars who have administrative power, which affects students. The harm of the administration of public colleges and universities is as follows: leading to the waste of the financial resources of the central and local governments and public universities and leading to the corruption of education. The quality of education is low. From the point of view of educational property rights, the main reasons leading to the administration of public universities in our country are: the singularity of property rights of public colleges and universities, and the unreasonable arrangement of ownership of public colleges and universities. The establishment and perfection of the property right of human capital have been neglected seriously, and the problem of insufficient incentive and the problem of "insider control" is more serious. The predicament of deadministration of public universities in our country mainly includes: the concept dilemma of understanding the necessity and measure of deadministration, the system predicament of lacking the guarantee of laws and regulations, and the operational dilemma of lacking classification guidance. First of all, we should unify the unified understanding of the necessity of deadministration, and perfect the modern university system with the core contents of university autonomy, academic freedom, academic freedom and student autonomy. And through extensive publicity, revision and improvement of the higher Education Law, formulation of the articles of Association of Public Colleges and Universities, standardization of the admission management system of public colleges and universities, devolution of admission management authority to the first level of the colleges and departments, reporting of enrollment targets by the departments and departments, and responsible for recruiting students, Cancel the admissions office. To reform the wage system and the system of resource allocation, to implement an annual salary system for university administrators and teachers, and once the educational funds allocated by the central and local governments have been allocated to schools, they shall be uniformly packaged into faculties and departments, which shall be allocated at their own discretion. Fully take care of all major, the balanced development of discipline, reduce the waste of resources and improve the efficiency of resource utilization.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：G647
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王宾齐;;我国高校行政化的表现及其产生的社会文化根源[J];教育探索;2010年10期
2 赵秋雁;王善迈;;论教育领域反腐倡廉长效机制的构建[J];教育发展研究;2006年19期
3 杨德广;;关于高校“去行政化”的思考[J];教育发展研究;2010年09期
4 韩建华;叶志坚;;高校“去行政化”的理性审视[J];教育发展研究;2010年09期
5 毛成;蔡玲丽;赵春鱼;;服务行政:高校“去行政化”改革新方向[J];教育发展研究;2010年09期
6 陈金圣;;用人制度改革:高校“去行政化”的切入点[J];教育发展研究;2010年11期
7 杨东平;;治理教育行政化弊端的思考[J];教育发展研究;2010年19期
8 陈何芳;;教授治校:高校“去行政化”的重要切入点[J];教育发展研究;2010年Z1期
9 杨玉圣;;大学“去行政化”论纲——论大学问题及其治理(之一)[J];社会科学论坛;2010年07期
10 韩冬雪;;去“官”化:大学改革之路[J];人民论坛;2010年30期
，本文编号：2125100
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/shifanjiaoyulunwen/2125100.html
