我国专业类高校评价标准与指标体系研究
发布时间:2018-12-13 02:04
【摘要】:在当前中国高等教育资源配置不尽合理、传统的“重学轻术”观念、社会中介机构推出的综合性评价等多种因素影响下,,专业类高校在办学发展过程中逐渐偏离了其服务行业的办学理念、迷失了办学方向,普遍存在追求综合性和规模化、趋向学术性、办学特色弱化等问题。为了引导各类高校分类发展、促进专业类高校各安其位、特色发展,有必要研发专业类高校的评价标准与指标体系。论文根据专业类高校的概念与基本特征,遵循结果性评价指标与形成性评价指标、定量指标与定性指标、数量指标与质量指标、共性指标与个性指标相结合的原则,借鉴已有高校评价研究成果,将专业类高校的评价标准预选为办学理念、人才培养、科学研究、社会服务、办学声誉5项,评价指标33项。通过专家访谈法、问卷调查法、因素分析法对评价标准与指标进行筛选,最终将评价标准精简为人才培养、科学研究、发展潜力3项,评价指标15项。采用层次分析法对指标体系进行赋权,从而构建了新的专业类高校评价指标体系,并就其运用方法进行较为详细的说明。论文设计的专业类高校评价指标体系与已有的高校评价指标体系相比,具有定量指标和定性指标设置相对均衡、评价主体多元化、综合评价客观质量和主观质量、分类评价与分层评价相结合、侧重评价高校质量和发展潜力、指标之间相对独立,概括凝练,兼顾公平等特点。
[Abstract]:Under the influence of many factors, such as the unreasonable allocation of higher education resources in China, the traditional concept of "attaching importance to learning and neglecting skill" and the comprehensive evaluation launched by social intermediary organizations, In the course of the development of professional colleges and universities, they gradually deviate from the idea of running a school in their service industry, lose the direction of running a school, and generally have problems such as the pursuit of comprehensiveness and scale, the tendency to academic and the weakening of the characteristics of running a school. In order to guide the classification development of all kinds of colleges and universities and to promote the development of professional colleges and universities, it is necessary to develop the evaluation standard and index system of specialized colleges and universities. According to the concept and basic characteristics of professional colleges and universities, the paper follows the principle of combining result evaluation index with formative evaluation index, quantitative index with qualitative index, quantity index with quality index, common index with individuality index. Referring to the research results of evaluation of colleges and universities, the evaluation standards of professional colleges and universities are pre-selected as five items of school running idea, talent training, scientific research, social service, school running reputation, and 33 evaluation indexes. By means of expert interview, questionnaire survey and factor analysis, the evaluation criteria and indexes were selected. Finally, the evaluation criteria were reduced to talent training, scientific research, development potential 3 and evaluation indexes 15. A new evaluation index system of specialized colleges and universities is constructed by using AHP to empower the index system, and its application method is explained in detail. Compared with the existing evaluation index system of colleges and universities, the evaluation index system designed in this paper has relative equilibrium between quantitative index and qualitative index setting, diversified evaluation subjects, comprehensive evaluation of objective quality and subjective quality. Combining classification evaluation with hierarchical evaluation, the authors emphasize on evaluating the quality and development potential of colleges and universities, which are relatively independent of each other, summarized and condensed, giving consideration to equity and so on.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:G649.2
本文编号:2375671
[Abstract]:Under the influence of many factors, such as the unreasonable allocation of higher education resources in China, the traditional concept of "attaching importance to learning and neglecting skill" and the comprehensive evaluation launched by social intermediary organizations, In the course of the development of professional colleges and universities, they gradually deviate from the idea of running a school in their service industry, lose the direction of running a school, and generally have problems such as the pursuit of comprehensiveness and scale, the tendency to academic and the weakening of the characteristics of running a school. In order to guide the classification development of all kinds of colleges and universities and to promote the development of professional colleges and universities, it is necessary to develop the evaluation standard and index system of specialized colleges and universities. According to the concept and basic characteristics of professional colleges and universities, the paper follows the principle of combining result evaluation index with formative evaluation index, quantitative index with qualitative index, quantity index with quality index, common index with individuality index. Referring to the research results of evaluation of colleges and universities, the evaluation standards of professional colleges and universities are pre-selected as five items of school running idea, talent training, scientific research, social service, school running reputation, and 33 evaluation indexes. By means of expert interview, questionnaire survey and factor analysis, the evaluation criteria and indexes were selected. Finally, the evaluation criteria were reduced to talent training, scientific research, development potential 3 and evaluation indexes 15. A new evaluation index system of specialized colleges and universities is constructed by using AHP to empower the index system, and its application method is explained in detail. Compared with the existing evaluation index system of colleges and universities, the evaluation index system designed in this paper has relative equilibrium between quantitative index and qualitative index setting, diversified evaluation subjects, comprehensive evaluation of objective quality and subjective quality. Combining classification evaluation with hierarchical evaluation, the authors emphasize on evaluating the quality and development potential of colleges and universities, which are relatively independent of each other, summarized and condensed, giving consideration to equity and so on.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:G649.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 胡咏梅;中美大学排行榜的对比分析[J];比较教育研究;2002年08期
2 马陆亭;我国高等学校分类的结构设计[J];北京大学教育评论;2005年02期
3 韩立文;程栋昱;欧冬舒;;什么是世界一流大学[J];北京大学教育评论;2006年04期
4 郭时印;向绪金;朱骞;蒋强勇;;影响大学评价指标科学性的主要问题及对策[J];高等农业教育;2011年03期
5 郑耿毅;关于世界一流大学的基本特征和标准[J];西北工业大学学报(社会科学版);2003年02期
6 张慧洁;我国应该设置相应的专业类高校——高校设置与分层分类的思考[J];西北工业大学学报(社会科学版);2003年04期
7 蔡言厚;蔡莉;;再进一步完善中国大学评价的若干建议[J];中国高等教育评估;2003年04期
8 中国校友会网大学评价课题组;赵德国;蔡言厚;冯用军;王凌峰;;《2010中国大学评价研究报告》摘要[J];中国高等教育评估;2010年01期
9 汪泓;;地方工科特色大学评价指标体系设计(上)[J];中国高等教育评估;2010年03期
10 潘懋元;车如山;;特色型大学在高等教育中的地位与作用[J];国家教育行政学院学报;2008年04期
本文编号:2375671
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/shifanjiaoyulunwen/2375671.html
最近更新
教材专著