物理课程阶段性与学生认知发展关系的初探
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology, physics plays an irreplaceable role in it. Today's young people are about to grow into a strong pillar of the future of the motherland, where they are the hope of the motherland. Therefore, the physics education of the university bears the important task of rejuvenating the country with science and technology. How to make the connection between high school physics and college physics is one of the most important research topics. Many scholars have analyzed and discussed the connection between junior high school physics and senior high school physics, and the connection between senior middle school physics and college physics in different degrees and from different angles. However, no one has been standing in the perspective of the stage of the curriculum to analyze the problem of cohesion. In this paper, physics learning is divided into three levels: high school physics, general physics and theoretical physics. The reason for this division is that the three phases present different forms of knowledge: high school physics studies physical phenomena (internal stage), ordinary physics studies the connection between physical laws, and establishes models for solving physical problems (interphase). Theoretical physics is a physical system (outer stage) established by physical concepts and physical laws. The stage theory of "inside, between, and outside" is Piaget's viewpoint of psychogenic theory, which emphasizes the influence of students' cognitive development on the phase convergence of physics curriculum. The research method adopted is the correlation analysis in educational statistics. The undergraduate students of the School of Physics and Electronic Science, Grade 2008, Shandong normal University, are selected as samples, and their total scores in the college entrance examination are analyzed. The correlation between the scores of general physics and theoretical physics is analyzed and discussed. It is found that the correlation coefficient between the scores of college entrance examination and the scores of general physics is much smaller than that of the scores of general physics and theoretical physics. After entering the university, after studying general physics, the scores have been redistributed, and the students who have very good grades in physics in senior high school may not be able to study well in general physics; After studying theoretical physics, the distribution of achievements has changed again. The results of general physics and theoretical physics show a good correlation. The good students of general physics also have good grades of theoretical physics. It reflects the process of students' grades from differentiation to adaptation. Students who have just finished high school and enrolled in college are not yet fully involved in the role. The content of curriculum has changed greatly, but the mode of thinking is still in the level of high school, which leads to the lack of matching between cognitive ability and curriculum development, which directly affects academic achievement. With the deepening of learning, students gradually adapt to the content and treatment of college physics curriculum, and the change of thinking structure makes students study better. The differentiation of students' achievement depends largely on the relationship between curriculum development and cognitive development. Through the analysis of the curriculum contents of senior high school physics and college physics, it is concluded that The characteristic of physics knowledge in senior high school is to generalize the physical concept and law from the phenomenon. The common physics is to find the connection between the physical laws, to establish the physical model, and to grasp the structure of knowledge in theory physics as a whole, which is of more universal significance. Combined with the stages of students' cognitive development, this paper expounds the relationship between the stages of curriculum development and cognitive development from the point of view of curriculum content, and analyzes the reasons for the differentiation. Finally, the author summarizes how the students adapt to the study of college physics from admission to graduation, and puts forward some suggestions to improve the teaching of college physics.
【学位授予单位】:山东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:O4-4;G652;G633.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陶沙;从生命全程发展观论大学生入学适应[J];北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2000年02期
2 黄沛天;用科学新观念充实大学物理教学内容[J];江西师范大学学报(自然科学版);1999年02期
3 张淳民;大学物理课程体系、教学内容、教学方法改革的实践探索[J];大学物理;2000年03期
4 蒋绚,黄晓琴;关于电磁学与电动力学打通的设想[J];大学物理;2004年04期
5 李学潜;刘松芬;;物理学中的逻辑思维,开放思维和创新思维[J];大学物理;2008年01期
6 潮兴兵;刘坚强;魏健宁;;大学物理课程内容与教学模式整合目的、方法及要点[J];大学物理;2010年02期
7 吴能芝;陈义成;;如何处理大学物理教学中的数学知识——以电磁学为例的探讨[J];高等函授学报(自然科学版);2005年05期
8 万勇;;由认知过程分析理论物理教学改革中的主要问题[J];高等理科教育;2005年06期
9 边志华,栗爱军;论大学物理教学内容的现代化[J];工科物理;1997年01期
10 卢德馨;大学物理学课程和教材的构思[J];中国大学教学;2000年02期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 许静;普通高中物理课程内容与大学物理课程内容的适切性研究[D];西南大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 唐淑君;新课程标准下高中物理与大学物理的衔接研究[D];山东师范大学;2011年
2 晏光辉;关于大学物理中电磁学部分教学的探讨[D];大连理工大学;2006年
3 雷凤兰;物理教学中培养学生归纳与演绎推理能力的研究[D];首都师范大学;2006年
4 张彬;从教育衔接层面探讨如何促进大学物理学习[D];华中师范大学;2007年
5 刘爽;从大学物理高度看高中物理教学[D];东北师范大学;2010年
本文编号:2442883
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/shifanjiaoyulunwen/2442883.html