当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 素质教育论文 >

我国大学招生考试社会化问题研究

发布时间:2018-04-23 12:43

  本文选题:大学招考制度 + 招考社会化 ; 参考:《华东师范大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:2010年我国政府出台《国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)》,明确提出完善高等学校考试招生制度,探索实行大学招生考试社会化。招考社会化的要义即政府宏观管理,专业机构组织实施,学校依法自主招生,学生多次选择。显然,招考社会化改革既是针对以往考试过于集权的弊病,也是我国公民社会逐渐成熟的必然趋势。本研究旨在解释考试社会化的理论依据及其现实的操作设计。 论文的思路主要围绕什么是大学招考社会化,为什么以及如何实现三个问题来展开的。在绪论之后,第一部分,界定什么是大学招考社会化,分析社会化改革的动力机制与制度目标并阐明其理论依据。公民社会理论界定了国家、社会和公民三者的关系,权力制衡理论主张用社会力量来约束过度的行政干预,治理理论主张“去行政化”实现多元主体合作共治。第二部分,分析了我国现行大学招考治理结构的特征,指出过度行政化抑制竞争和自治,造成程序不公平,即由现行制度的缺陷来阐释为什么要实行考试社会化改革。第三部分,借鉴了日本、美国的一些大学招考社会化运作的经验,观照当下我国社会发育的水平,针对四类当事人,笔者提出社会化改革的构想:政府持有对招考组织、大学招生的认证监督权;社会专业组织提供考试服务;大学自主招生;考生公民独立投考与原就读中学脱钩。为了增强研究的实证性本论文还作了一些实证调查,对91位(有效问卷)中学校长进行了问卷调查,对7位专家学者进行了访问咨询。 大学招生考试社会化引入了公民社会力量和市场机制,开创了一个合作共治的局面,它将扭转整个教育格局,其基本价值取向是通过政府、高校和社会专业组织的合作共治来满足个人发展和社会进步的需要。本论文希望对我国大学招考社会化做出点滴贡献。
[Abstract]:In 2010, the Chinese government issued the outline of the National medium and long term Education Reform and Development Plan 2010-2020, and put forward a clear proposal to perfect the examination enrollment system of colleges and universities, and to explore the socialization of university enrollment examination. The main points of socialization of entrance examination are macro management of government, organization and implementation of professional organizations, admission of students according to law, and students' choice for many times. Obviously, the socialized reform of entrance examination is not only aimed at the malpractice of over-centralization of power in the past, but also an inevitable trend of the maturation of civil society in our country. The purpose of this study is to explain the theoretical basis and practical operational design of examination socialization. This paper focuses on three problems: what is the socialization of college entrance examination, why and how to realize it. After the introduction, the first part defines what is the socialization of university entrance examination, analyzes the motive mechanism and system target of socialized reform and clarifies its theoretical basis. The theory of civil society defines the relationship among the state, society and citizens. The theory of power balance holds that the excessive administrative intervention should be restrained by social forces, while the theory of governance advocates "deadministration" to realize the cooperation of multiple subjects. The second part analyzes the characteristics of the governance structure of the current university entrance examination, and points out that excessive administration inhibits competition and autonomy, which results in unfair procedure, that is, explain why the reform of socialization of examination should be carried out by the defects of the current system. The third part, drawing lessons from the experience of socialized operation of some universities in Japan and America, taking into account the current level of social development in our country, aiming at the four kinds of parties, the author puts forward the idea of socialized reform: the government holds the organization of entrance examination. College enrollment certification supervision; social professional organizations to provide examination services; independent university enrollment; independent candidates citizens and the original secondary school entrance examination decoupling. In order to enhance the positivities of the study, this paper also makes some empirical investigations, including 91 middle school principals (valid questionnaires) and 7 experts and scholars. The socialization of university entrance examination has introduced the strength of civil society and market mechanism, created a situation of cooperation and co-governance, which will reverse the whole educational pattern, and its basic value orientation is through the government. Cooperation between colleges and social professional organizations to meet the needs of personal development and social progress. This thesis hopes to make little contribution to the socialization of college entrance examination in our country.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G647.32

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 申素平;公立高等学校与政府的分权理论[J];比较教育研究;2003年08期

2 熊耕;美国高等教育认证制度的功能分析[J];比较教育研究;2005年02期

3 周光礼;;论中国政府与教育中介组织的互动关系:一个法学的视角[J];北京大学教育评论;2006年03期

4 郑若玲;;自主招生公平问题探析[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期

5 格里·斯托克,华夏风;作为理论的治理:五个论点[J];国际社会科学杂志(中文版);1999年01期

6 申素平;论我国高等教育体制改革过程中政府角色的转变[J];高教探索;2000年04期

7 徐纬光;社会形态、政治权力和教育体制——当代中国教育体制改革的逻辑[J];复旦教育论坛;2004年04期

8 胡国勇;;竞争选拔与质量维持——大众化背景下日本大学入学考试的变革与现状[J];复旦教育论坛;2007年01期

9 张行涛;;考试社会学研究的回顾与展望[J];湖北招生考试;2002年04期

10 谢小庆;考试应该体现谁的意志[J];湖北招生考试;2003年20期

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 郑若玲;考试与社会之关系研究[D];厦门大学;2006年

2 樊本富;中国高校自主招生研究[D];厦门大学;2009年



本文编号:1792024

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/1792024.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户badb6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com