教师参与大学内部治理模式研究
发布时间:2018-05-08 10:55
本文选题:教师 + 大学内部治理 ; 参考:《东北大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:学术是大学的本质,教师作为学术的主体,是大学重要的组成部分。纵观西方各著名高校,无一不是教师在其中发挥了重要作用。建国后,我国教师在大学中逐渐参与大学内部事务,发挥着越来越重要的作用,尤其是上世纪《高等教育法》等法律法规的实施,为教师参与大学内部事务提供了法律上的保障。尽管如此,由于我国大学一直实行党政领导体制,行政权力在大学占主导地位,教师在大学内部自主性受限,影响教师积极性主动性的发挥和大学办学水平的提高。随着治理理论引入我国大学内部,作为一个重要的利益相关者,教师在大学内部中的地位更加重要。 正是在这种情况下,教师参与大学内部治理的研究受到重视。如何构建出一个模式,使教师在大学内部治理中发挥出应有的作用,平衡大学内部的权力,为教师参与大学内部治理提供指导,成为高等教育界所面临的一个问题。 文章共分六章,说明了选题背景和意义,对相关文献进行了综述,交代了论文结构,研究方法和创新点。第二章对治理,大学治理,模式等概念进行了界定,并且阐述了本文的两个理论基础:利益者相关者理论与人本管理理论,它们与本文是切适的。第三章以我国教师参与大学内部治理的主要途径或形式为依据,具体分析了我国现有的两个教师参与大学内部治理模式:职代会与委员会相结合模式和教授委员会模式。第四章从三个方面分析了我国教师参与大学内部治理模式存在的问题,并通过对教师和行政人员的访谈来深入挖掘存在的问题。此外还分析了导致我国教师参与大学内部治理模式存在问题的原因,主要从三个方面分析。第五章提出了改进我国教师参与大学内部治理的原则和建议,并且在其中借鉴世界著名大学的相关经验。最后为结论部分,为研究结论与不足之处。 目前我国大学内部的治理是以校长为代表的行政权力为主的,教师的作用没有完全发挥,受到行政的制约,参与度还不够。因此,根据我国的国情,借鉴国外相关经验,完善我国教师参与大学内部治理的模式,并提出根据大学的侧重点不同,选择不同的教师参与内部治理模式是具有重要意义的。
[Abstract]:Academic is the essence of the university, teachers as the main body of the academic, is an important part of the university. Throughout the famous western colleges and universities, all teachers have played an important role in it. After the founding of the people's Republic of China, Chinese teachers gradually participated in the internal affairs of universities and played a more and more important role, especially the implementation of laws and regulations such as the higher Education Law of the last century. It provides a legal guarantee for teachers to participate in the internal affairs of the university. However, because of the Party and government leadership system, the administrative power is dominant in the universities, and the autonomy of teachers in the universities is restricted, which affects the teachers' enthusiasm and initiative and the improvement of the level of running a university. With the introduction of governance theory into Chinese universities, as an important stakeholder, teachers play an even more important role in universities. It is in this situation that the research of teachers' participation in university internal governance is paid attention to. How to construct a model to make teachers play their due role in the internal governance of universities, balance the power within universities and provide guidance for teachers to participate in the internal governance of universities has become a problem facing the higher education circle. The article is divided into six chapters, explaining the background and significance of the topic, summarizing the relevant literature, explaining the structure of the paper, research methods and innovation points. The second chapter defines the concepts of governance, university governance and mode, and expounds the two theoretical bases of this paper: stakeholder theory and humanistic management theory, which are appropriate to this paper. The third chapter is based on the main ways or forms of teachers' participation in the internal governance of universities in our country, and analyzes two existing modes of teachers' participation in the internal governance of universities: the combination of the staff Congress and the committee and the model of the professor committee. The fourth chapter analyzes the existing problems of teachers' participation in the internal governance model of universities from three aspects, and deeply excavates the existing problems through the interview of teachers and administrators. In addition, the paper analyzes the causes of the problems of teachers' participation in the internal governance model of universities in China, mainly from three aspects. The fifth chapter puts forward the principles and suggestions to improve the teachers' participation in the internal governance of universities in our country, and draws lessons from the relevant experiences of famous universities in the world. The last part is the conclusion, the conclusion and the deficiency. At present, the internal governance of universities in our country is based on the administrative power represented by the president. The role of teachers is not fully brought into play, and is restricted by administration, and the degree of participation is not enough. Therefore, according to the national conditions of our country, draw lessons from the relevant experience of foreign countries, perfect the mode of teachers' participation in the internal governance of universities, and put forward that it is of great significance to choose different teachers' participating in the internal governance mode according to the different emphases of the universities.
【学位授予单位】:东北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G645.1;G647
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 金红莲;;日本国立大学内部治理的制度变迁[J];比较教育研究;2010年09期
2 雷恩安;;论现代大学制度下大学内部治理结构的优化[J];长春工业大学学报(高教研究版);2008年02期
3 曲耀华;刘清利;;大学章程与大学内部治理[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2009年03期
4 曲耀华;;我国公立高校内部治理结构的构建[J];中国电子教育;2009年04期
5 甘永涛;;美国大学教授协会:推动共同治理制度的重要力量[J];高教探索;2009年03期
6 蒋洪池;;美国大学内部治理中的教师权力探析——以密苏里大学堪萨斯城分校为例[J];高教探索;2010年05期
7 朱同琴;;牛津大学内部治理机关的分权与制衡机制[J];高教探索;2010年05期
8 许青云;;论我国大学内部治理关系及治理模式思考[J];消费导刊;2009年06期
9 顾建民;刘爱生;;教授治学的演化、局限及其中国困境[J];复旦教育论坛;2011年04期
10 姚叶;;国外大学章程对大学内部治理的规定及其启示[J];贵州师范学院学报;2011年07期
,本文编号:1861108
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/1861108.html