大学课程理论流派演变研究

发布时间：2018-05-15 03:27

本文选题：大学课程 + 课程理论流派　；参考：《兰州大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：大学课程理论流派之间错综复杂的关系使我们在回顾大学课程的历史时往往没有头绪,找不到思想之河的源头与流向,对大学课程发展与演变的历史轨迹缺乏清晰的认识,对大学课程史的浑然不知就可能致使我们在大学课程改革的实践中犯下在前人看来愚蠢的错误。因此,提高我国的高等教育质量、改革高等学校当前的人才培养模式迫切要求深化大学课程改革,加强对大学课程理论流派发展与演变的研究。大学课程与社会、学生保持了互动变化的关系,大学课程的发展演变始终离不开社会制度、文化的发展演变。真正意义上大学课程始于中世纪大学兴起之后,在19世纪之前基本上未形成大学课程理论流派,关于大学课程的思想还未成体系、多为教学经验的总结；但19世纪之后,大学课程史进程中却涌现了实用主义、要素主义、永恒主义、存在主义、社会改造主义以及其它一些大学课程理论流派,各大学课程理论流派相互影响,共同构成了当前大学课程理论流派多元共存的局面。受政治、经济、科技、社会等外部因素和哲学思潮、课程理念、知识观、人性观等内部因素的影响,大学课程理论流派发展演变的轨迹表现为从线性模式到非线性模式；从专业本位到以人为本；从科学知识为主到科学知识与人文知识并重；从教学中心到学生中心的演变。每一种大学课程理论流派都是文化建构和社会环境的产物,只有那些更好适应社会环境的事物才能繁衍生息,不适应环境的只能遭到淘汰。未来的大学课程理论流派将长期呈现一种多元共存的局面,复杂化与多元化将是大学课程理论流派未来的基本走向；无法摆脱政治的影响仍然是未来大学课程理论流派的一大特点；关注课程实践是未来大学课程理论流派的必然趋势。未来大学课程理论流派的发展在整体上是螺旋式上升发展的,但在某一个时期或一段时间内也可能是混沌无序的。
[Abstract]:The intricate relationship between the school of university curriculum theory makes us often have no clue when looking back the history of the university curriculum, find the source and direction of the river of thought, and lack a clear understanding of the historical track of the development and evolution of the university curriculum. Ignorance of the history of the university curriculum may lead us to make a stupid mistake in the practice of college curriculum reform. Therefore, to improve the quality of higher education in our country and to reform the current talent training mode of colleges and universities, it is urgent to deepen the reform of university curriculum and to strengthen the research on the development and evolution of the school of university curriculum theory. The university curriculum and the society, the student has maintained the interactive change relations, the university curriculum development evolution has always been inseparable from the social system, the cultural development evolution. In a true sense, the university curriculum began after the rise of medieval universities, and before the 19th century there was basically no school of university curriculum theory. The ideas about the university curriculum were not systematized, mostly summed up by teaching experience; but after the 19th century, However, pragmatism, essentialism, eternity, existentialism, social reformism and some other schools of university curriculum theory have emerged in the course of the history of university curriculum. Together, it constitutes the situation of multiple coexistence of the current school of university curriculum theory. Influenced by external factors, such as politics, economy, science and technology, society and philosophy, curriculum idea, knowledge view and human nature view, the evolution of the school of university curriculum theory shows from linear model to nonlinear model. From professional standard to people-oriented, from scientific knowledge to scientific knowledge and humanistic knowledge, from teaching center to student center. Each school of university curriculum theory is the product of cultural construction and social environment. Only those things that are better adapted to the social environment can reproduce and survive, and those who do not adapt to the environment can only be eliminated. In the future, the school of university curriculum theory will present a situation of multiple coexistence for a long time, complexity and diversification will be the basic trend of the school of university curriculum theory in the future. Being unable to get rid of the influence of politics is still a major characteristic of the school of university curriculum theory in the future, and paying attention to curriculum practice is the inevitable trend of the school of university curriculum theory in the future. In the future, the development of the school of university curriculum theory is spiraling upward as a whole, but it may also be chaotic and disorderly in a certain period or a period of time.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G642.3

【相似文献】