当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 素质教育论文 >

民办高校教学评估问题与对策研究

发布时间:2018-06-24 11:43

  本文选题:民办高校 + 教学评估 ; 参考:《西南大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:为保证我国高等教育的稳步可持续发展,教育部制定了五年一轮的本科高校教学水平评估制度。迄今为止第二轮评估工作即将结束。实践证明,开展教学评估工作对高校教学质量的监督与提高起到了巨大的促进作用。在我国,各级高校承载着为国家提供大量优秀人才的重要任务,为满足社会发展的需要,高等教育从“精英教育”不断向“大众教育”转变,民办高校、二级学院等犹如雨后春笋般的冒出。民办教育规模过于迅猛的发展使社会大众不得不产生一些疑问:民办高校的办学条件、师资力量、教育资源等是否有质量保证?人才培养是否合格?为办放心教育,民办高校也积极参与到了教学评估工作中。即便是如此,我国教育部还没有设立专门针对民办高校的教学评估制度,正是在这一背景下,笔者选择民办高校教学评估进行研究,具有一定的理论意义和现实意义。 本文通过对湖南省的4所民办高校进行问卷调查和专家访谈,发现民办高校教学评估在评估指标、评估主体、评估实施、评估结果等四个方面都相继存在着不同的问题,其中以评估指标的问题为主。现今,民办高校跟普通高校运用的是同一套评估指标(即2004年出台的《普通高等学校本科教学工作水平评估方案(试行)》),此指标体系的评估范围较广,且具有良好的导向作用,但也因为过于缺乏针对性,用统一的标准来衡量不同类别的学校,不符合高等教育多样化发展的需求。 最后,文章按照提出问题、分析问题、解决问题的思路。首先,提出在原有普通高校教学评估方案的基础上,结合民办高校的办学特点,运用平衡计分卡来构建民办高校教学评估指标体系。其次,对评估主体、评估实施、评估结果反馈上也提出相应的优化建议。笔者通过此研究,以求构建一个更加适合民办高校教学发展的“共性+个性”的教学评估体系。但是由于时间、条件和本人所学专业的限制,设计指标体系时对其权重赋值的研究不够,但作者提出的这一思想和基本体系框架,对以后民办高校教学评估指标的制定有较大的参考价值。
[Abstract]:In order to ensure the steady and sustainable development of higher education in China, the Ministry of Education has formulated a five-year evaluation system for teaching level of undergraduate colleges and universities. To date, the second round of assessment work is nearing completion. Practice has proved that the work of teaching evaluation plays an important role in the supervision and improvement of teaching quality in colleges and universities. In China, colleges and universities at all levels are carrying the important task of providing a large number of outstanding talents for the country. In order to meet the needs of social development, higher education has been changing from "elite education" to "mass education". Secondary colleges and so on have sprung up like bamboo shoots. The rapid development of private education makes the public have to have some questions: the conditions of running a private university, the strength of teachers, educational resources and so on are there any quality assurance? Is talent training qualified? In order to do rest assured education, private colleges and universities are also actively involved in teaching evaluation. Even if this is the case, the Ministry of Education has not set up a special teaching evaluation system for private colleges and universities. It is under this background that the author chooses the teaching evaluation of private colleges and universities for research, which has certain theoretical and practical significance. Based on a questionnaire survey and an expert interview in four private colleges in Hunan Province, this paper finds that there are different problems in the evaluation index, the main body, the implementation and the result of teaching evaluation in private colleges and universities. Among them, the evaluation index is the main problem. At present, private colleges and universities use the same set of evaluation indicators (i.e., the "Evaluation Program of undergraduate Teaching level of ordinary Colleges and Universities (trial)"), which has a wide range of evaluation scope and has a good guiding role. However, because of the lack of pertinence, the use of uniform standards to measure different types of schools does not meet the needs of diversified development of higher education. Finally, the article according to put forward the question, analyze the problem, solve the train of thought of the problem. First of all, on the basis of the original teaching evaluation scheme of ordinary colleges and universities, combined with the characteristics of private colleges and universities, the balanced scorecard is used to construct the teaching evaluation index system of private colleges and universities. Second, the evaluation subject, evaluation implementation, evaluation results feedback also put forward the corresponding optimization recommendations. Through this research, the author tries to construct a teaching evaluation system which is more suitable for the teaching development of private colleges and universities. However, due to the limitations of time, conditions and major, the study of weight assignment in the design of index system is not enough. However, the author puts forward this idea and basic system framework. It has great reference value for the establishment of teaching evaluation index in private colleges and universities.
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G647

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 侯威,许明;澳大利亚高等教育质量保证机制概述[J];比较教育研究;2002年03期

2 陈子彤;刘向菊;;基于AHP的企业经营者平衡记分卡指标权重的研究[J];商业研究;2007年08期

3 顾美玲;;关于加强民办高校教育质量评估的思考[J];四川文理学院学报;2007年06期

4 陈彬,欧金荣;从“政府失灵”看我国高等教育评估改革[J];高等师范教育研究;2003年03期

5 潘懋元,吴玫;高等学校分类与定位问题[J];复旦教育论坛;2003年03期

6 孙志鸿;;民办高校评估新视角[J];北京城市学院学报;2007年06期

7 李晓康;侯晓蕾;;我国民办高等教育评估制度研究[J];北京城市学院学报;2010年02期

8 熊志翔;欧洲高等教育质量保障模式的形成及启示[J];高等教育研究;2001年05期

9 李铁君,齐梅;建立我国高等教育评估中介机构的探讨[J];高等教育研究;2003年02期

10 李伟娜;王宇翔;;美国高等教育评估机构发展探析[J];黑龙江教育(高教研究与评估);2006年06期

相关硕士学位论文 前7条

1 贺纹;我国民办高校评估特征研究[D];河海大学;2006年

2 陈淼焱;普通高校本科教学工作水平评估问题研究[D];东北师范大学;2006年

3 马睿;高等学校本科教学工作水平分类评估模式研究[D];西北工业大学;2007年

4 贺敏娟;基于高等教育分类的民办高等教育评估研究[D];西北大学;2009年

5 马亮;基于平衡计分卡的高校绩效管理的构建[D];苏州大学;2009年

6 易柱勤;基于动态平衡计分卡的高校绩效评价研究[D];哈尔滨理工大学;2009年

7 刘莎;教学评估现实审视与中介性教学评估研究[D];西南大学;2010年



本文编号:2061405

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/2061405.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户21fe2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com