当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 素质教育论文 >

创造性思维测验(TCI)中文版修订

发布时间:2019-05-24 08:27
【摘要】:目的修订创造性思维测验(TCI),考察大学生样本的信效度,并了解大学生的创造性思维水平及结构。 方法采用翻译-回译、专家评定法形成创造性思维测验(TCI)中文版,采用问卷调查法对河南省三所高校的400名被试进行施测,回收有效问卷360份,调查数据主要使用SPSS16.0软件进行项目分析,信度和效度检验以及人口学的差异性检验。 结果修订后的测验包括2个项目,总测验的难度为0.43,重测信度为0.763,基于标准化的Alpha系数为0.896,与威廉斯创造力倾向测验中的好奇性、想象性及总分相关系数分别为0.588、0.699、0.622(p0.01),与中国人人格7因素量表的开创性因子相关系数为0.310(p0.01),而与其他人格因子相关不显著。大学生的创造性思维在性别之间、专业之间、地区之间有显著差异,具体来说,女生的分数高于男生(p0.01),中小城市的分数高于农村(p0.01);文史和农医类的得分高于理工类(p0.01);不同年龄阶段之间的得分无显著性差异。 结论修订后的创造性思维测验中文版(TCI-C)内部一致性信度、重测信度、内容效度和实证效度均达到心理测量学要求,适用于中国大学生被试。大学生的创造性思维发展水平不平衡,女生高于男生,来自中小城市的大学生高于来自农村或直辖市的大学生,文史类的大学生和农医类的大学生高于理工类大学生。创造性思维与其开创性人格特质关系密切,与其他人格特质无关。
[Abstract]:Objective to revise the creative thinking test (TCI),) to investigate the reliability and validity of college students' samples, and to understand the level and structure of college students' creative thinking. Methods the Chinese version of Creative thinking Test (TCI) was formed by translation-back translation and expert evaluation. 400 subjects from three colleges and universities in Henan Province were tested by questionnaire, and 360 valid questionnaires were collected. The survey data mainly used SPSS16.0 software for project analysis, reliability and validity test and demographic difference test. Results the revised test included two items, the total difficulty of the test was 0.43, the retest reliability was 0.763, the standardized Alpha coefficient was 0.896, and the curiosity in Williams creativity tendency test. The correlation coefficients of imagination and total score were 0.588, 0.699 and 0.622 (p0.01), respectively. the correlation coefficient between imaginative and total score was 0.310 (p0.01), but not with other personality factors. The creative thinking of college students is significantly different between gender, major and region. Specifically, the score of female students is higher than that of male students (p0.01), and the score of small and medium-sized cities is higher than that of rural areas (p0.01). The scores of literature and history and agricultural medicine were higher than those of science and technology (p0.01), but there was no significant difference among different age stages. Conclusion the internal consistency reliability, retest reliability, content validity and empirical validity of the revised Chinese version of Creative thinking Test (TCI-C) meet the psychometric requirements and are suitable for Chinese college students. The development level of creative thinking of college students is not balanced, female students are higher than boys, college students from small and medium-sized cities are higher than those from rural areas or municipalities directly under the Central Government, students in literature and history and agricultural medicine are higher than college students in science and technology. Creative thinking is closely related to its groundbreaking personality traits and has nothing to do with other personality traits.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G647

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 童秀英,沃建中;高中生创造性思维发展特点的研究[J];心理发展与教育;2002年02期

2 张锋,冯庆林,何亚云;20年来的西方创造性心理测量研究:方法与问题[J];西北师大学报(社会科学版);2003年01期

3 张丽华;白学军;;创造性思维研究概述[J];教育科学;2006年05期

4 庄寿强;试论特点、属性的区别与联系及其在科学研究中的意义[J];自然辩证法研究;1997年11期

5 王颜芳;;大学生创造性思维现状研究[J];信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年05期

6 张军;青海大学生创造性思维及其相关因素研究[J];心理科学;2005年02期

7 胡卫平,Philip Adey,申继亮,林崇德;中英青少年科学创造力发展的比较(英文)[J];心理学报;2004年06期

8 朱晓红;儿童学习动机类型与创造力倾向关系的研究[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2001年06期

9 童秀英,张艳莲,姜雅东,高玉峰;创造性思维的心理学研究(综述)[J];河北职业技术师范学院学报;2003年01期

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 王小凤;大学生创新思维加工策略的实验研究[D];湖南师范大学;2007年

2 李慎秀;大学生创造性思维水平与词语联想能力关系的实验研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2007年

3 刘晟楠;创造性思维水平高、低大学生类比推理能力与工作记忆关系的实验[D];辽宁师范大学;2006年



本文编号:2484716

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/2484716.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户638d9***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com