第11-13届健美操世锦赛中外混双项目成套动作对比研究
本文关键词:第11-13届健美操世锦赛中外混双项目成套动作对比研究 出处:《北京体育大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:我国竞技健美操从20世纪末发展至今,与国际接轨不到20年的时间里发展迅速,稳步提高。男子项目特别是男子集体项目多次获得世界冠军,中国逐渐发展为竞技健美操第一集团国家。但是同样作为竞技健美操重要部分的混双项目成绩一直不太理想,也不够稳定,在2014年的第13届世界锦标赛上混双项目仍然没有拿到奖牌,也没有助力团体成绩达成夺金目标,混双项目在一定程度上牵制我国健美操整体实力。论文立足FIG2009-2012和2013-2016两版竞赛规则,运用文献资料法、专家访谈法、对比分析法、录像分析法、数理统计法对第11-13届世锦赛混双决赛前六名与中国队从成套动作进行量化统计,分析影响我国混双项目成套编排的优势及存在的主要问题,为提高我国竞技健美操综合实力提供理论支撑和依据。研究结果表明:1.西班牙队、罗马尼亚队综合实力最强,特别是在艺术性编排上优势较为明显,成套编排新颖独特,过渡连接动感流畅;法国选手配合默契,表演热情激烈,但是完成质量稳定性欠缺。中国选手的技术水平稳步提高,与世界先进国家完成方面的差距逐渐缩小,艺术性编排和难度方面还有待提高。2.中国队操化动作编排多样性和复杂性较好;移动路线多样性与世界水平持平甚至更高;过渡动作与连接动作的数量达到平均水平;托举动作的空间层次变化及绕轴变化较为复杂。3.中国队编排不足主要表现在成套动作强度偏低,难度布局在成套动作中有失均衡,高分值难度动作比重较低,动力性配合,过渡与连接动作编排的艺术性有待提高。4.意大利队、俄罗斯队和法国队成套动作频率较高,中国队整体的频率和强度较低;难度动作的完成率罗马尼亚队最好,中国队在第11届世锦赛较低在第12和第13届世锦赛中有较大的提高,与世界先进水平相当;完成动作的一致性与完成分呈正相关,在第13届世锦赛中一致性程度较好。5.世锦赛前八名成套动作不同组别难度的选用比例比较一致:中国队选择的中高分的难度比例较低,成套动作的整体难度较低;,在成套动作前后半套的难度数量分布有失均衡。6.西班牙队三届世锦赛成套动作中均使用两个难度组合,且分值较高,体现运动员素质的高水准。中国队在第12届和第13届世锦赛中成套动作使用中高分值的难度比例有所提高,难度组合也呈现向高难方向发展。
[Abstract]:Since the end of twentieth Century the development of Sports Aerobics in China, with international standards to develop quickly, 20 years increased steadily. Men especially the men's collective project has won the world championship, Chinese has gradually developed into the first group National Aerobics aerobics. But also as an important part of the mixed grade has not very good, is not stable, the mixed doubles in 2014 thirteenth World Championships still did not get the medal, no power group performance reached the gold target, mixed in contain a certain extent of Aerobics in China overall strength. Based on the FIG2009-2012 and 2013-2016 version of the two competition rules, using the method of literature, expert interviews. Comparative analysis, video analysis, mathematical statistics for the 11-13 World Championships mixed doubles final top six teams from Chinese and complete sets of actions for quantitative statistics, Analysis of advantages of our mixed doubles set arrangement and the main problems, to provide theoretical support and reference for improving China's competitive aerobics comprehensive strength. The results showed that: 1. the Spanish team, the Romania team the strongest comprehensive strength, especially in the art of arranging the advantage is obvious, the set arrangement is novel and unique, transitional connection dynamic fluid; France's Peihemoqi show intense, but complete lack of stability. The technical level of quality China players has improved steadily, with advanced countries in the world to complete the gap gradually narrowed, artistic layout and difficulty still remains to improve.2. Chinese team movement arrangement of the diversity and complexity of path diversity and better; the level of the world or even higher; and the number of connection movement transition average; space level change lifts and around .3. China axis complex change team arrangement main problems in routine low strength, difficult layout is out of balance in complete movement, high value difficulty proportion is low, the power with the art of transition and connection movements to improve the.4. Italy team, the Russian team and the French team set action of high frequency, Chinese the frequency and intensity of the whole team is low; the difficulty of the completion rate of Romania's best team, China has greatly improved in the eleventh World Championships in the lower twelfth and thirteenth World Championships, and the world's advanced level; consistency to complete the action associated with the completion of the degree of consistency was positively, good.5. before the world championships eight the proportion of the complete sets of actions in different groups were consistent with difficulty in the thirteenth World Championships: China team selection in high difficulty is relatively low, the overall set of action is difficult Low;, complete sets of actions before and after half the number of difficulty distribution has two difficulty using unbalanced.6. combination of Spain's three World Championships in complete action, and higher scores, reflects the high level athlete quality. China team with the higher score of difficulty increased in the twelfth and thirteenth World Championships in complete action, combination of difficulty also presents the development direction to difficult.
【学位授予单位】:北京体育大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G831.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 缑小燕,马迅;世界和我国优秀艺术体操运动员成套中动作节奏与音乐节奏关系之比较[J];北京体育大学学报;1997年03期
2 姚侠文,陆保钟,郑吾真,竭晓安,马鸿韬,李艳翎,宋晓东,刘兴;难美技能类体育项目技术创新理论研究[J];北京体育大学学报;2003年04期
3 桑国强;我国竞技健美操技术水平与世界整体水平差距的探析[J];北京体育大学学报;2004年10期
4 马鸿韬;李敏;;体育表演艺术概念及分类的探讨[J];北京体育大学学报;2006年09期
5 张晓莹;;竞技健美操难度组合动作的研究[J];北京体育大学学报;2012年04期
6 刘姗姗;赵宝椿;朱传健;;我国青少年竞技健美操后备人才培养现状述评[J];贵州体育科技;2012年01期
7 窦丹;张小龙;刁在箴;;中外优秀健美操混双运动员难度动作的对比研究[J];广州体育学院学报;2011年05期
8 张晓莹;王伟光;;健美操世界锦标赛成套难度动作的竞争态势[J];北京体育大学学报;2014年05期
9 徐中秋;黎健冰;;从国际健美操规则变化剖析世界竞技健美操发展趋势[J];首都体育学院学报;2014年04期
10 朱荣;汪玮琳;;第十届世界健美操锦标赛混双项目托举动作与动力性配合动作分析[J];赣南师范学院学报;2011年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 袁守龙;我国竞技体育赛事组合系统结构的优化与应用[D];北京体育大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 金逵;我国竞技健美操技术水平及影响因素研究[D];北京体育大学;2003年
2 刘昊;我国竞技健美操后备人才培养及可持续发展的研究[D];华中师范大学;2004年
3 冷新科;中国竞技健美操竞赛发展研究[D];厦门大学;2006年
4 龚艳;我国竞技健美操弱势项目难度动作之探骊[D];华中师范大学;2008年
5 毛丽华;竞技健美操世界强国优势特征分析[D];首都体育学院;2009年
6 张利芳;竞技健美操托举与动力性配合动作的创新研究[D];湖南师范大学;2009年
7 张洁;我国竞技健美操混双项目成套编排及完成质量的研究[D];华中师范大学;2009年
8 邹海林;近三届健美操世锦赛我国混双与前3名运动技术水平的对比分析[D];苏州大学;2013年
,本文编号:1434100
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/1434100.html