2013-2014NBA总决赛马刺队与热火队技术运用对比分析

发布时间：2018-01-18 13:21

本文关键词：2013-2014NBA总决赛马刺队与热火队技术运用对比分析　出处：《太原理工大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：技术作为篮球运动竞赛中最为重要的制胜因素之一，技术的运用与发挥情况直接决定着比赛的结果。通过文献资料法、专家访谈法、录像观察法和数理统计法，对2013-2014NBA总决赛马刺队与热火队5场比赛的进攻技术、防守技术和攻守兼备技术的系统全面地比较，探索高水平篮球比赛中的制胜因素，找出胜利和失败的原因，为未来篮球训练和竞赛工作提供可参考性意见。主要研究结论如下：（1）第一回合：马刺队内线技术发挥稳定，在罚球得分、二分球得分效率、三分球得分效率、助攻技术上，马刺队占据优势，造成对手失误得分、二分球得分、二分球和三分球贡献率马刺低于热火；第一回合马刺队在紧逼防守技术的发挥方面弱于热火队。（2）第二回合：马刺队在投篮总次数上占优，助攻次数较多，但内线发挥不好，投篮的命中率不高，热火队主力较高的罚球次数和较高的罚球命中率，二分球（近距离投篮）贡献率、快攻得分、内线得分和造成对手失误得分方面，热火队在本场比赛中的发挥情况均优于对手高出马刺队；热火队替补队员的紧逼防守和后场篮板技术的良好发挥造成马刺队出现较多失误。（3）第三回合：马刺队在本场比赛中，三分球贡献率、替补队员在得分贡献率、总得分效率、罚球次数、罚球命中率、助攻次数、抢断球、盖帽技术发挥、快攻得分技术方面和内线技术运用方面均高于热火；马刺队在三分球进攻、主力二分进攻技术运用的时效性方面弱于热火队。（4）第四回合：马刺队主力队员、替补队员比热火队有着较高的近距离得分效率、投篮的命中率、罚球命中率、助攻次数、前场篮板和后场篮板，马刺队三分球命中率并不表现出较大的差距，三分球贡献率低于热火队；在抢断球技术和紧逼防守技术运用造成对手失误方面，双方球队并没有表现出明显的优势。（5）第五回合：远投技术的发挥、得分效率方面，，马刺队明显优于对手，尤其是替补队员的优势更为明显；在助攻技术、快攻技术、抢断球技术运用方面，马刺队在本场比赛中占据明显优势，热火队较低的助攻效率，过多依靠个人技术强攻也是导致最终失利的重要原因。（6）场均比较结果：马刺队替补队员进攻方面承担着更多进攻角色，而热火队过多地依赖主力队员；马刺队在篮下的整体进攻技术和中近距离投篮技术方面的发挥优于热火队；马刺队二分球、三分球命中、得分效率、罚球命中率、场均助攻次数、全场篮板数量、近距离投篮技术运用的实施效果，以及紧逼造成对手失误技术均高于热火队；在整体上，马刺队内线得分优于热火队，但热火队主力队员的内线较强，而替补队员的内线得分技术能力与马刺队替补队员相比相对较差。
[Abstract]:As one of the most important winning factors in basketball competition, the application and exertion of technology directly determine the result of the game. Through the method of literature, expert interview, video observation and mathematical statistics. In order to explore the winning factors in the high-level basketball match, the attack technique, defense technique and attack and defense technology of the Spurs and Heat in the 2013-2014 NBA Finals are compared in a systematic and comprehensive way. To find out the reasons of victory and defeat, to provide reference for future basketball training and competition. The main conclusions are as follows: The first round: the Spurs inline technique plays the stable, in the free throw score, the two-point goal score efficiency, the three-point score efficiency, the auxiliary attack technique, the Spurs team occupies the superiority, causes the opponent to miss the score. The contribution rate of two-ball and three-point Spurs was lower than that of Heat. The first-leg Spurs were weaker than the Heat in pressing defensive skills. Second round: the Spurs in the total number of shots in the total number of times, more times of assists, but the inside play is not good, shooting shooting rate is not high, the Heat's main force higher number of free throws and a higher percentage of free throws hit. The contribution rate of two-point ball (close shot), fast break score, inside line score and cause the opponent error score aspect, the heat team in this competition performance situation is superior to the opponent high Spurs team; The hot fire team substitute's tight defense and the backcourt backboard technique good display causes the Spurs team to appear many mistakes. Third round: the Spurs team in this game, three-point contribution rate, substitute in the score contribution rate, total scoring efficiency, free throw times, free throw hit ratio, assists, steals, cap play. The fast break score technique and the inside line technical application aspect are higher than the hot fire; Spurs in the three-point attack, the main 2-point attack technology application of the effectiveness of the team is weaker than the Heat. 4th round: the Spurs main player, the substitute team than the Heat has a higher close scoring efficiency, shooting hit rate, free throw hit rate, assists, the front and backcourt rebounds. The Spurs' three-point shooting rate does not show a big gap, the contribution rate of the three-point ball is lower than that of the Heat. The two teams did not show a clear advantage in the use of steals and tight defensive techniques to make mistakes. (5) 5th round: far throw technology, scoring efficiency, the Spurs team is obviously superior to the opponent, especially the advantage of the substitute is more obvious; In the auxiliary attack technology, fast break technology, the use of steals technology, the Spurs in this game occupies a clear advantage, the Heat's low auxiliary efficiency. Too much reliance on personal skills is also an important cause of eventual defeat. The results show that the Spurs substitute plays more offensive roles, while the Heat rely too much on the main players. The Spurs play better than the Heat in the overall offensive technique under the basket and the mid-close shooting technique. Spurs 2 points, 3 points hit, scoring efficiency, free throw hit rate, the average number of assists in the field, the total number of rebounds, the implementation of the use of close shooting technology. As well as pressing to cause the opponent error technology are higher than the heat team; On the whole, the inside score of Spurs is better than that of the Heat, but the inner line of the main players of the Heat is stronger, and the technical ability of the substitute is relatively poor compared with the substitute of the Spurs.
【学位授予单位】：太原理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G841

【参考文献】