体育科学实证研究的逻辑流与证据链

发布时间：2018-02-17 06:37

本文关键词： 逻辑流证据链连续性研究调查实验研究方法体育科学　出处：《体育科学》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：什么样的论文是好论文?逻辑性强或许是所有好论文的共同特点。从研究问题的来龙去脉、连续研究的起承转合、证据积累的有序推进3个方面讨论了一项研究或一篇论文的逻辑性体现。为了清晰表述研究问题的来龙去脉,研究者需要首先回答该项研究为什么重要的问题;需要对核心概念给出明确的抽象界定和操作界定;需要旁征博引,有理有据地说明研究问题的理论价值和应用价值;需要以适当篇幅对前人的研究做出明确的、有说服力的评价,特别是,需要指明前人研究的不足或是已知与应知之间的差距。为了合理设计连续研究中的各项子研究,研究者可以通过平行关系或递进关系体现过渡连接,并借助11种策略(或其他策略)逻辑地、有序地推进自己的研究使之不断走向深入。为了有序推进证据积累的过程,研究者首先需要不断自问:证据在哪里?是弱证据还是强证据?有证据链支持吗?还需要理解自己的研究处于因果关系证据阶梯的哪个层面。最后指出,好研究、好论文会使读者在逻辑流和证据链中感受到作者说服的智慧、思辨的力量和理性的光芒。
[Abstract]:What kind of paper is a good paper? Logic is perhaps the common feature of all good papers. Three aspects of the orderly advance of evidence accumulation discussed the logical embodiment of a study or a paper. In order to clearly describe the origin of the research problem, the researcher should first answer the important question of why the research is important; The core concepts need to be clearly defined abstractly and operationally; the theoretical and applied value of the research should be explained in a reasonable and well-informed way; and the previous studies should be clearly defined at an appropriate length. Persuasive assessments, in particular, need to identify gaps in previous studies or gaps between known and known knowledge. In order to reasonably design sub-studies in a continuous study, researchers can demonstrate transitional connections through parallel or progressive relationships. In order to advance the process of evidence accumulation in an orderly way, researchers need to ask themselves: where is the evidence? Is it weak evidence or strong evidence? Is there evidence chain support? Finally, it is pointed out that good research and good papers will make readers feel the wisdom of persuasion, the power of speculation and the light of reason in the logical flow and the chain of evidence.
【作者单位】：北京体育大学运动人体科学学院;
【分类号】：G80-3

【相似文献】