当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 体育论文 >

体育院校术科教师教学绩效评价体系构建探析

发布时间:2018-03-20 19:54

  本文选题:术科教师 切入点:教学绩效 出处:《成都体育学院》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:术科是体育院校办学特色和优势的主要载体,术科教师作为术科教学活动的实施者,是提高术科教学质量的担当者、主力军和促进派。因此对术科教师教学绩效进行评价也就成为了体育院校人力资源管理的一项重要内容。但当前多数体育院校是术科与学科教师共用一套教学绩效评价指标,忽略了术科为操作式技术性教学,其组织形式和教学内容均不同于学科的事实,加之存在:评价目的模糊、评价主体单一、评价内容不全面、评价方法待改进等问题,各体育院校现行术科教师教学绩效评价体系几乎都有待改进和完善。本论文是在对国内外高校教师教学绩效评价的实践发展脉络和理论研究现状进行梳理总结的基础上,以价值理论、系统理论、激励理论为指导,从明确评价目的、选择评价方法、设计评价指标体系、确定评价主体四个维度对体育院校术科教师教学绩效评价体系构建进行了探析,研究的主要内容及结论包括:基于对奖惩性和发展性教师教学绩效评价地比较分析,提出术科教师教学绩效评价目的应是在不放弃奖优罚劣管理的同时,最大限度地发挥其诊断提高功能,即:在调动术科教师教学积极性的同时,促进术科教师业务水平和学校术科教学质量提升。在总结归纳前人对现有评价方法所做研究的基础上,根据评价目的、评价对象特点以及评价过程操作的可行性确定选择360度反馈法多角度、全方位的对术科教师教学绩效进行评价,并就其主要内涵及实施步骤进行了说明。明确了评价指标体系的构成要素和设计原则;采用专家访谈法、德尔菲法拟定了评价指标,包括:课程教学、指导实训实习、指导毕业论文(设计)、教材及课程建设4项一级指标以及逐层分解所获得的12项二级指标和42项三级指标;通过层次分析法确定了体现上述各项评价指标重要性程度的权重;并按“优秀、良好、合格、不合格”4级划分设定了指标评价等次。依据360度反馈法原理,在选择学生、同行专家、领导以及教师本人作为术科教师教学绩效评价主体的同时,筛选确定了每项评价指标所适用的评价主体以及不同主体评价结果的权重。
[Abstract]:The technical subject is the main carrier of the characteristics and advantages of the physical education colleges and universities. As the executor of the technical teaching activities, the technical teachers are responsible for improving the teaching quality of the technical subjects. Therefore, the evaluation of teaching performance of technical teachers has become an important part of human resource management in physical education colleges. However, at present, most sports colleges and universities share a set of teaching performance evaluation indicators with their subject teachers. The fact that the technical subject is an operational technical teaching is ignored, and its organizational form and teaching content are all different from those of the subject. In addition, there are some problems, such as vague evaluation purpose, single evaluation subject, incomplete evaluation content, and the evaluation method to be improved, etc. Almost all the current teaching performance evaluation systems of technical teachers in physical education colleges need to be improved and perfected. This paper is based on the summary of the current situation of theoretical research and practice development of teaching performance evaluation in colleges and universities at home and abroad. Under the guidance of value theory, system theory and incentive theory, the evaluation method is chosen, and the evaluation index system is designed. This paper analyzes the construction of teaching performance evaluation system of technical teachers in physical education colleges from four dimensions. The main contents and conclusions are as follows: based on the comparative analysis of rewards and punishments and developmental teachers' teaching performance evaluation. It is proposed that the purpose of teaching performance evaluation of technical teachers should be not to give up the management of rewards and penalties, but also to give full play to its diagnosis and improvement function, that is, to mobilize the teaching enthusiasm of technical teachers at the same time, To promote the professional level of technical teachers and the quality of teaching in schools. On the basis of summing up the previous researches on existing evaluation methods, according to the purpose of evaluation, The characteristics of the evaluation object and the feasibility determination of the operation of the evaluation process the 360 degree feedback method is adopted to evaluate the teaching performance of the technical teachers in all directions. It also explains its main connotation and implementation steps, clarifies the constituent elements and design principles of the evaluation index system, uses the method of expert interview and Delphi's method to draw up the evaluation index, including course teaching, guiding practical practice, and so on. Guiding graduation thesis (design, teaching materials and curriculum construction 4 first class indicators and 12 secondary indicators and 42 third level indicators obtained from the decomposition of each layer), through the analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of the importance of the above evaluation indicators; According to the four levels of "excellent, good, qualified and not qualified", the index evaluation grade is set. According to the principle of 360-degree feedback method, students, experts, leaders and teachers themselves are selected as the main body of teaching performance evaluation of technical teachers. The weight of the evaluation subject and the evaluation results of different subjects were determined by screening each evaluation index.
【学位授予单位】:成都体育学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G807.4

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 吴振利;;论教师教学绩效评价的属性[J];教学与管理;2007年25期

2 杜治平;郑曼;;浅议高校教师的教学绩效激励[J];陕西科技大学学报(自然科学版);2011年06期

3 李健;;语文教学绩效:基于影响因素的分析与建议[J];课程·教材·教法;2011年07期

4 程勇;;政治教学绩效:基于影响因素的分析与改进[J];教学与管理;2012年16期

5 张赛鹏;;教师教学绩效评价的困境与对策[J];考试周刊;2010年12期

6 陈媛;;独立学院教学绩效可拓判别模型研究[J];科技创业月刊;2008年12期

7 吴乐珍;李会平;;关于网络案例教学绩效评估的探讨[J];教育与职业;2009年24期

8 张红波;李超;张林波;傅松波;;博客对教师教学绩效的影响实验研究[J];软件导刊(教育技术);2010年06期

9 卢豫开;张莉;;多媒体教学绩效的二维有向图模型[J];现代教育技术;2010年11期

10 胡兵华;;中小学多媒体教学绩效评价的关联规则分析[J];中国教育信息化;2011年10期

相关重要报纸文章 前3条

1 邓国柱;曲江百万重金奖教提效[N];韶关日报;2008年

2 据《文汇报》;从“优秀教师”到“快乐教师”[N];中国教育报;2003年

3 撰文 俞佩忠;解密嘉高:一所新型名校的“罗马之路”[N];嘉兴日报;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前6条

1 王天文;体育院校术科教师教学绩效评价体系构建探析[D];成都体育学院;2015年

2 胡兵华;基于数据挖掘的中小学多媒体教学绩效评价研究[D];江南大学;2010年

3 王丽丽;语文多媒体教学绩效评价指标体系的设计与研究[D];江南大学;2013年

4 冯惠;高校教师教学风格与教学绩效的关系研究[D];河北经贸大学;2015年

5 刘乐梅;地方普通高等学校教师教学绩效评估的现状与对策研究[D];陕西师范大学;2014年

6 马鹤;信息化课堂教学绩效评价体系研究[D];东北师范大学;2009年



本文编号:1640569

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/1640569.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户23385***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com