第31届奥运会中国男篮与四强球队内线球员进攻能力的对比研究

发布时间：2018-03-24 13:43

本文选题：内线球员　切入点：进攻能力　出处：《北京体育大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着当代篮球运动的蓬勃发展,篮球比赛中的技巧、战术也日臻完善。内线球员不仅需要具有强悍的得分能力,也善于采取助攻和策应等助攻方式。因此,球队在进攻时,内线球员的活跃可以极大地缓解外线队员的进攻压力,从而带活了全队的技战术术实施,在比赛中占据有利位置。中国男篮同成为世界级的优秀男篮强队还存在着一定的差距,首当其冲的就是内线球员的选拔和培养。而随着国家队内世界级内线球员姚明的退役,中国队内涌现出的后起之秀们距离世界级优秀球员还具有很长的一段距离要奋斗。本文主要研究内线球员的进攻能力,通过对在第31届奥运会中,中国男篮和男篮四强球队内线球员的进攻能力这一方面研究入手,透过比赛数据分析出上述两者之间存在的差距,并给出相应的合理化建议有:1、中国队内线球员与四强内线球员在身体条件上不占优势,主要体现在体重和克托莱指数方面,中国队内线球员身材普遍偏瘦,在强对抗条件下进攻不占优势。2、中国内线球员进攻技术、进攻方式过于单一。进攻时相比于四强球队球员进攻方式简单,过于依赖中远距离的中投。进攻位置低位进攻次数较少,多为高位进攻手段。3、中国队内线队员与四强球队内线球员在拼抢前场篮板方面相比是有一定差距。篮板球拼抢意识较为薄弱,拼抢篮板球技术较为单一。抢到篮板后二次意识薄弱,无法造成有效杀伤。4、中国国内线球员参与进攻战术基础配合的策应意识较四强球队内线球员较为薄弱。传球意识薄弱且传球手段较为单一。5、中国内线球员与四强球队内线球员相比基本功较差。进攻技术较为粗糙,运球能力、传球细节等有一定差距。
[Abstract]:With the vigorous development of contemporary basketball, the techniques and tactics in basketball match are becoming more and more perfect. The inside players not only need to have strong scoring ability, but also be good at taking assistant attack and strategy, etc. Therefore, when the team is attacking, The active inline players can greatly relieve the offensive pressure of the outside players, thus bringing the whole team's techniques and tactics into practice and occupying a favorable position in the match. There is still a certain gap between the Chinese men's basketball team and the strong teams of the world class excellent men's basketball teams. The first to bear the brunt is the selection and training of internal players. And with the retirement of Yao Ming, a world-class domestic player in the national team, There is still a long way to go before the rising stars emerge from the Chinese team. This paper mainly studies the offensive ability of the inside players. Starting with the research on the attacking ability of the inner line players of the top four teams of the Chinese men's basketball team and the men's basketball team, the gap between the above two teams is analyzed through the match data. The corresponding rationalization suggestions are given as follows: 1: 1, the Chinese team's inner players and the top four players do not have an advantage in physical conditions, mainly reflected in the body weight and the Ketole index, the Chinese team's inside players are generally thin. Under the condition of strong confrontation, there is no advantage in attack. 2. The attacking technique of Chinese inner line players is too simple. The attack mode is simpler than that of the top four team players. Relying too much on the middle and long distance CIC. The attack position low attack frequency is less, Most of them are high offensive means. 3. Compared with the top four team players, there is a certain gap between the Chinese team and the top four team players in the front court rebound, the sense of rebounding is relatively weak, The rebound technique is relatively simple. After the rebound, the second time consciousness is weak, Unable to cause effective killing. 4, China's domestic line players' response consciousness of participating in the basic cooperation of offensive tactics is weaker than that of the top four teams' inner line players, the passing consciousness is weak and the passing method is single. 5, Chinese inside line players and the four top four players are weaker than those in the top four teams. The players on the inside of the team are inferior to their basic skills. The offensive techniques are rough. Dribbling ability, passing details and so on there is a certain gap.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G841

【相似文献】