高水平篮球比赛竞技表现“量化”评价研究——以对2015-2016、2016-2017两届CBA总决赛“量化”评价为实证

发布时间：2018-03-24 23:14

本文选题：高水平　切入点：竞技　出处：《广州体育学院学报》2017年05期

【摘要】：依据美国教练李H·路斯的评价体系和NBA"霍林格效率值"原理,选出评价指标,包括2分球中、2分球失、3分球中、3分球失、罚球中、罚球失、进攻篮板、防守篮板、助攻、防守犯规、进攻犯规、抢断、失误、封盖等14个指标,并在所确定的指标上,给各个指标合理的增减权值,同时,确定评价标准,最终以这个标准建立评价运动员的竞技表现系统,对2015-2016总决赛五场球、2016-2017CBA总决赛四场球外籍球员和本土球员竞技表现进行评价。2015-2016CBA总决赛五场球竞技表现的平均数7.1,标准差为6.9;2016-2017CBA总决赛四场球竞技表现的平均数8.7,标准差为6.5。运用这个标准,对两届的决赛竞技表现做出评价。此"量化"评价的结果达到了客观说明高水平篮球比赛球员竞技表现的真实性,并且是量化地评价了运动员的工作业绩,做到了准确、恰当,避免了模糊定性。为今后评价篮球运动员的竞技表现提供了可以实用的方法,也为篮球运动员改变比赛行为,提高竞技质量指明了方向。
[Abstract]:According to the evaluation system of American coach Lee H. Ruth and the principle of NBA's "Hollinger efficiency value", the evaluation indexes are selected, including 2 points, 2 points, 3 points, 3 points, free throws, free throws, offensive rebounds, defensive rebounds, assists. Defensive fouls, offensive fouls, steals, errors, seals, and so on 14 indicators, and in the determined indicators, to give each index a reasonable increase or decrease, at the same time, determine the evaluation criteria, Finally, using this criterion to establish a competitive performance evaluation system for athletes, Evaluation of the competitive performance of foreign and native players in the 2016-2017CBA Finals. The average performance of five balls in the 2015-2016 CBA Finals is 7.1, and the standard deviation is 6.9 / 2016-2017CBA Finals with an average of 8.7. The difference is 6.5. Applying this standard, The results of this "quantitative" evaluation have objectively explained the authenticity of the competitive performance of the players in high-level basketball matches, and quantitatively evaluated the performance of the athletes, and achieved accuracy and appropriateness. It provides a practical method for evaluating basketball players' competitive performance in the future, and also points out the direction for basketball players to change their game behavior and improve their competitive quality.
【作者单位】：广东外语外贸大学体育部;
【分类号】：G841

【相似文献】