中国队羽毛球运动员在2014年汤姆斯杯半决赛中的技战术分析

发布时间：2018-04-13 00:17

本文选题：汤姆斯杯 + 技战术分析　；参考：《湖南师范大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：汤姆斯杯羽毛球赛是世界上最高水平的男子羽毛球团体赛,这种赛事运动员表现出的技战术,引领世界羽毛球运动的发展方向与潮流。对比赛的研究,可以能总结出运动员的技术风格、战术体系、指导思想。在过去10年中国羽毛球队在汤姆斯杯都是第一,而在2014年本决赛中输给了日本队。本文将对中国队羽毛球运动员在2014年汤姆斯杯的半决赛中技战术进行分析,分析运动员的技战术的优势与不足,便于教练员、运动员能更好的把握羽毛球制胜规律,为以后的训练提供一定的帮助。为提高我国羽毛球运动技战术水平提高理论依据。本文采用了文献综述法、数理统计法、录像观察法和对比分析法,通过观察汤姆斯杯半决赛的比赛录像,通过录像统计出相关羽毛球技战术数据,并依据大量文献所整理出的分析方法对中日双方的比赛数据进行分析,得出技战术运用上的差异,进行总结得出以下结论:1男子单打的比赛中,对于发球区域的选择,中国队和日本队都以1号区域和5号区域为主。接发球的选择,中国队和日本队都以网前的搓放和勾对角为主。2男单比赛中,前场技术的运用,比赛双方的主要选择是搓放,次数明显多于其他技术。而搓放、勾对角以及扑球都是运动员所采取的主要方式。中场技术的使用上,挡球是使用得最多的。而后场方面,不管是谌龙还是杜鹏宇,杀球次数都远远少于日本选手,而高远球则远远多于对方,可见其进攻不如日本选手。3男单比赛中,谌龙主动得分和田儿贤一相差不多,但是在失分方面却远远高于对方,可以看出,谌龙比赛中失误多于对方。而杜鹏宇的主动得分与失分都和桃田贤斗相近,没有太大差别。4男子双打比赛中,双方队员对于发球落点的选择同样是以1、5号区域为主,而接发球方面,双方都以推球和放网为主,其他技术的使用较少。而第三拍技术上,挡球和推球成为主要选择,双方这两项技术的使用都远远多于其他技术。5男子双打的比赛中,得失分的情况,中国队的主动得分比日本队要多,失分方面,也比对方要多。而战术方面,双方都采取的是前封后攻战术,而攻中路的技术渐渐失去主体地位。
[Abstract]:Thomas Cup Badminton tournament is the world's highest level of men's badminton team competition, this kind of event athletes show skills and tactics, leading the development direction and trend of the world badminton.The research on the competition can sum up the technical style, tactical system and guiding ideology of the athletes.The Chinese badminton team has been number one in the Thomas Cup for the past 10 years, but lost to Japan in the 2014 final.This paper will analyze the techniques and tactics of the Chinese badminton players in the 2014 Tombs Cup semi-final, and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the players' techniques and tactics, so as to facilitate the coaches and athletes to better grasp the winning rules of badminton.To provide some help for future training.In order to improve the level of badminton techniques and tactics in China to improve the theoretical basis.This paper adopts literature review method, mathematical statistics method, video observation method and comparative analysis method, through observing the game video of the Thomas Cup semi-final, through the video statistics related badminton techniques and tactics data.And according to the analysis method collated by a large number of documents, this paper analyzes the match data between China and Japan, obtains the differences in the application of techniques and tactics, and concludes the following conclusions: the choice of serve area in the male singles game of 1: 1.The Chinese team and the Japanese team are mainly in region 1 and 5.The choice of receiving and serving, the Chinese team and the Japanese team are in front of net rub and hook diagonal mainly in the men's singles competition, the use of front-court technology, the main choice of both sides of the game is rubbing, the number of times is obviously more than other techniques.Rubbing, ticking, and bowling are the main ways players take.The use of midfield techniques, blocking is the most used.In the backcourt, whether Chen long or du Pengyu, the number of times they kill the ball is far less than that of the Japanese player, and the high distance ball is far more than the other side. It can be seen that Chen long's active score is not much different from that of Kenichi Tanaka in the men's singles competition of Japanese player .3.But in the loss of points is far higher than the other side, you can see, Chen long in the match more mistakes than the other side.And du Pengyu's active score and loss of points are similar to those of Peach Tian Xianduo, and there is no great difference in the men's doubles competition. In the men's doubles competition, the players of both sides also choose the service landing points mainly in the area of 1 and 5, and receive the serve.Both sides to push the ball and put the main netting, other techniques are less used.And in the third shot technique, blocking and pushing balls became the main choice. The use of these two techniques by both sides was far more than that of other techniques in the men's doubles. In the case of winning or losing points, the Chinese team scored more points than the Japanese team and lost points.And more than each other.In terms of tactics, both sides adopt the former and the post-attack tactics, and the technology of attacking the middle road gradually loses its dominant position.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G847

【参考文献】