我国公共体育服务绩效评价研究述评

发布时间：2018-04-26 02:05

本文选题：公共体育服务 + 绩效评价　；参考：《体育科学》2017年04期

【摘要】：采用文献资料调研、逻辑分析等方法对公共体育服务绩效评价研究现状进行梳理,旨在探讨公共体育服务绩效评价研究方法;把握其指标体系构建过程和结果、自身实证分析及检验;最终目的是概括研究的共识,指出研究存在的不足和未来研究展望。研究结果:1)公共体育服务绩效评价研究尚处于起步阶段,理论研究比较薄弱;指标体系构建存在短板,实证研究缺乏广度和深度;2)初步形成了"前期基础-经验预选-指标遴选-指标处理-体系构建-确定权重"指标体系构建过程的逻辑顺序;3)公共体育服务绩效评价实证分析比较薄弱。建议:1)理论研究方面应趋于基础理论、评价主体、评价机制、评价方式、评价原则等方面;2)加强对公共体育服务绩效评价指标体系构建过程研究;3)公共体育服务绩效评价方法各有利弊,应结合实际选取最优方法;4)加强理论研究与实证分析有效结合。
[Abstract]:Through literature investigation, logic analysis and other methods, the present situation of performance evaluation of public sports service is combed in order to probe into the research method of public sports service performance evaluation, to grasp the construction process and results of its index system. The ultimate purpose is to generalize the consensus of the research, point out the shortcomings of the research and future research prospects. Results: 1) the research on the performance evaluation of public sports service is still in its infancy, but the theoretical research is relatively weak. The lack of breadth and depth in the empirical research has initially formed the logical sequence of the construction process of "Prophase foundation-experience pre-selection, index selection, index processing-system construction-weight determination" (3) the performance of public sports service. The evaluation empirical analysis is relatively weak. It is suggested that the theoretical research should be oriented to basic theory, evaluation subject, evaluation mechanism, and evaluation method. (2) strengthening the research on the construction process of public sports service performance evaluation index system. 3) the methods of public sports service performance evaluation have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the best method should be selected in combination with the actual situation. 4) strengthen the combination of theoretical research and empirical analysis.
【作者单位】：湖南工业大学体育学院;苏州大学体育学院;大连理工大学文法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(15BTY013) 中国博士后科学基金项目(2016M601872)
【分类号】：G812.4

【相似文献】