当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 体育论文 >

透析新规则的实施对我国竞技健美操集体五人项目的影响

发布时间:2018-05-29 06:38

  本文选题:竞技健美操 + 竞赛规则 ; 参考:《北京体育大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:健美操的起源是传统的有氧健身运动,经过长时间的发展与演变衍生出了当今的竞技健美操。竞技健美操属于技能主导类表现难美性项群的比赛项目。随着竞技健美操比赛的诞生,产生了竞赛规则。其规则从难度、完成、艺术三个方面制定了不同的评分标准。竞技世界健美操锦标赛从最开始的一年举行一次到后来进入二十一世纪后改为每两年举办一次,同时竞技健美操的规则也将以四年为一个周期进行修改。本文运用文献资料法、录像观察法、数理统计法、比较分析法、专家访谈法等多种研究方法,将国际体操联合会2009—2012版和2013—2016版竞技健美操评分规则进行对比分析,统计艺术裁判、完成裁判、难度裁判评分内容的具体变化。通过分析第十一届至第十三届世界健美操锦标赛我国集体项目的成套动作和成绩,以及第十三届世界健美操锦标赛参加决赛各国的成套动作成绩,得出规则变化对我国集体项目发展的影响,找出我国集体项目中存在的问题和不足,明确我国集体五人操的发展方向。研究结果如下:(1)由国际体操联合会修订的2013—-2016版竞技健美操评分规则变化较大。增加有氧舞蹈和有氧踏板项目裁判的评判指南,区分国际年龄组的竞赛规则和评分标准,调整了竞技健美操参赛场地、参赛项目、各项目成套完成时间,增加了技巧动作。对艺术裁判、完成裁判、难度裁判的评分细则制定出了更为细致明确的标准。(2)在第十三届健美操世锦赛中,我国难度动作的完成始终保持在世界水平前列,一致性方面也优于对手。对比第十二届世锦赛中完成分的获得,第十三届世锦赛的难度分虽然有所下降,但针对难度动作的成功率我国保持着上升趋势。(3)在第十三届健美操世锦赛中,艺术分的高低是决定最后名次的关键,相比榜首的罗马尼亚队,我国在成套动作的编排上有所欠缺,艺术表现力有所不足。(4)2013—2016版竞技健美操评分规则中对常用难度动作价值分调整,我国集体五人项目成套动作的难度价值分出现了下降,对我国参加世界健美操锦标赛集体项目成套动作中难度分的获得不利。(5)我国在第十一届、十二届、十三届世锦赛中全部由男运动员参加集体项目,2013—2016版竞技健美操评分规则中根据参赛运动员性别不同,将难度系数调整,对我国难度分的获得不利。
[Abstract]:The origin of aerobics is the traditional aerobic exercise. Competitive calisthenics belong to the skill-dominated performance of the difficult-to-beauty events. With the birth of competitive aerobics competition, there are rules of competition. Its rules from the difficulty, completion, art three aspects of the development of different scoring standards. The World Aerobics Championships are held every two years from the beginning of the first year to the 21 century, and the rules of competitive Aerobics will be revised in a cycle of four years. In this paper, using the methods of literature, video observation, mathematical statistics, comparative analysis, expert interview and other research methods, the competitive aerobics scoring rules of the International Gymnastics Federation 2009-2012 and 2013-2016 are compared and analyzed. Statistics of the art referee, the completion of the referee, difficult referee rating content of the specific changes. By analyzing the complete sets and results of the collective events in China from the 11th to the 13th World Aerobics Championships, as well as the complete sets of action achievements of the 13th World Aerobics Championships participating in the finals of the World Aerobics Championships, The influence of the rule change on the development of the collective project in our country is obtained, the problems and deficiencies in the collective project are found out, and the developing direction of the five-person collective operation in our country is clarified. The results are as follows: 1) the 2013-2016 edition of competitive Aerobics scoring rules revised by the International Gymnastics Federation has changed greatly. The evaluation guide of the judge of aerobic dance and aerobic pedal events is added, the competition rules and scoring standards of international age group are distinguished, the competitive aerobics competition field, the entry items, the complete time of each event are adjusted, and the skill movement is added. In the 13th World Aerobics Championship, the completion of our country's difficulty movements has always remained in the forefront of the world level. Consistency is also superior to opponents. In contrast to the completion points of the 12th World Championship, although the difficulty score of the 13th World Championship has decreased somewhat, the success rate of the difficulty movements in China has maintained an upward trend.) in the 13th World Aerobics Championships, The art score is the key to the final position. Compared with the Romanian team, which is at the top of the list, our country has some deficiencies in the arrangement of the complete sets of movements. There is some deficiency in artistic expressiveness. In the scoring rules of the 2013-2016 edition of competitive aerobics, the value of common difficulty movements is adjusted, and the difficulty value score of the collective five-person events in our country has decreased. For China to participate in the World Aerobics Championships, the difficulty score in the collective events set is unfavorable. 5) in the 11th and 12th sessions of the Chinese National Aerobics Championship, In the 13th World Championship, all male athletes participate in the collective event, the 2013-2016 edition of competitive aerobics scoring rules, according to the gender of the participants, the adjustment of the difficulty coefficient will be disadvantageous to the difficulty score of our country.
【学位授予单位】:北京体育大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G831.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 贺改芹;对我国竞技健美操现状及发展趋势的研究[J];北京体育大学学报;2001年01期

2 董新军;刁在箴;姜铁军;李红芳;;竞技健美操新版规则变化的特点及对策研究[J];北京体育大学学报;2006年03期

3 黄璐;对我国竞技健美操发展战略的探讨[J];首都体育学院学报;2005年02期

4 朱炜淼;;浅析影响竞技健美操六人项目运动成绩的非竞技能力因素[J];广州体育学院学报;2008年S1期

5 李莳;;我国健美操发展应采取的对策[J];长春教育学院学报;2014年02期

6 董丽丽;刁在箴;;中外竞技健美操三人操项目难度动作比较研究[J];哈尔滨体育学院学报;2006年04期

7 杨云霞;王燕军;;竞技健美操三人操项目难度编排对比分析[J];湖北体育科技;2008年06期

8 许凌;刁在箴;喻家瑜;;中国竞技健美操男单项目难度动作及价值分析[J];湖北体育科技;2009年02期

9 李小娟;;2009版与2005版健美操国际规则变化的对比研究[J];湖北体育科技;2010年01期

10 王欣;黄伟群;邹业兵;;竞技性健美操编排艺术之研究[J];经济研究导刊;2009年01期

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 武博;基于FIG竞技健美操规则的变化分析集体六人操技术水平的发展[D];北京体育大学;2011年

2 王智超;竞技健美操规则变化与技术发展的互动性研究[D];河北师范大学;2011年

3 邹玮;竞技健美操新旧规则的变化趋势研究[D];上海交通大学;2011年

4 逯红红;第十一届世界健美操锦标赛六人操技术水平对比研究[D];山西师范大学;2012年

5 王翠娟;竞技健美操六人操的发展趋势与我国竞技健美操六人操的对策研究[D];山东师范大学;2004年

6 冷新科;中国竞技健美操竞赛发展研究[D];厦门大学;2006年

7 赵燕;规则导向下竞技健美操集体项目成套动作编排的研究[D];华中师范大学;2007年

8 董一文;第九届世界健美操锦标赛我国六人项目技术水平分析[D];东北师范大学;2007年

9 易元香;中国竞技健美操竞赛规则演变研究[D];北京体育大学;2004年

10 熊米娜;我国竞技健美操成套动作艺术性的研究[D];武汉体育学院;2008年



本文编号:1949876

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/1949876.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4ec6c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com