中国残奥乒乓球队轮椅组主要对手的技战术研究

发布时间：2018-06-02 23:20

本文选题：乒乓球 + 残疾人　；参考：《北京体育大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：为积极备战里约残奥会,选取SEO Su Yeon等五位中国残奥乒乓球队轮椅组主要对手为研究对象,运用文献资料法、专家访谈法、录像观察法、数据统计法和逻辑分析法等研究方法,搜集并整理五位主要对手的基本信息资料,通过录像观察,统计其发球、第三板、接发球、第四板以及相持段的技术使用、落点分布等得失分情况,分析和探究他们在不同阶段的优劣势技术和技战术使用特点,在此基础上结合中国残奥乒乓球队各级别主力运动员的情况制定针对性的战术策略并提出合理化的训练建议。研究结果如下:1、西欧素颜发球的旋转、落点变化多,尤其是底线1位置和近网短球的威胁性更强;接发球以反手控制为主,反手接侧上旋的能力较弱,但其正手接发球威胁较大;相持以控制对方的左半台为主,正手的相持能力较弱。2、阿尔奎斯特发球速度快,力量大,落点以对方中路为主;接发球抢攻积极主动,落点以中路和底线1位置为主;相持能力突出,抢攻连续性较好,但移动轮椅迎前的能力差,近网短球处理差。3、马蒂克竞技能力提高较快;发球旋转不强,发球动作和落点变化多,第三板抢攻积极,威胁性较高;接发球以控制为主,反手控制能力提高较多;相持过程中击球稳定性增强,反手抢攻更加积极主动。4、托马斯的发球质量较高,发抢时正手抢攻更具威胁性;接发球以搓控为主,容易因旋转判断不够清晰而失分;相持中反手搓控较稳定,正手控制和抢攻能力相对偏弱,对方变直线后其防守的能力差。5、厄兹蒂尔克发球灵活多变,发球抢攻和接发球抢攻积极主动,威胁性强;相持能力一般,连续反手搓控后,正手抢攻意识较反手强,防守能力差。
[Abstract]:In order to actively prepare for the Rio Paralympic Games, five main opponents of the wheelchair group of the Chinese Paralympic Table Tennis team, including SEO Su Yeon, were selected as the research objects. The methods of literature, expert interviews, video observation, data statistics and logic analysis were used. Collect and organize the basic information materials of the five main opponents, and through video observation, count the gains and losses of the service, the third board, the receiving serve, the fourth board and the technical use of the holding section, the distribution of the landing points, etc. This paper analyzes and probes into their advantages and disadvantages in different stages and their technical and tactical characteristics. On the basis of this, the author makes specific tactical strategies and puts forward rational training suggestions in combination with the situation of the main players of the Chinese Paralympic Table Tennis team at various levels. The results of the study are as follows: 1. Western Europe has a lot of changes in the rotations of plain colors, especially in the position of bottom line 1 and the threat of the short ball in the near net. The receiving serve is dominated by backhand control, but the ability of backhand to top spin is weak. But its forehand service is a big threat; the main holding is to control the left half of the opponent, the forehand's ability to hold each other is weak. Al Quast serves quickly, has a great strength, and the main point is the center of the opponent. The landing point is mainly in the middle and bottom line 1, the ability of holding is outstanding, the continuity of rush attack is good, but the ability of moving wheelchair to face is poor, the short ball handling of near net. 3, the competitive ability of Matic is improved faster, the serve rotation is not strong, More changes in the serve and landing point, the third board attack is positive, threatening; serve mainly to control, backhand control ability to improve more; in the process of holding the ball, the stability of the ball is enhanced, the third board attack is positive, the threat is high; the receiving serve is mainly controlled, the backhand control ability is improved more. Backhand grabbing is more proactive. 4. Thomas' serve quality is higher, forehand grabbing is more threatening when serving and grabbing is more threatening; receiving serve is mainly controlled by rubbing, and it is easy to lose points because rotation judgment is not clear enough; backhand rubbing control is more stable in each other. Forehand control and preemptive attack ability is relatively weak, the ability of defense after the opposing side changes straight line is poor. 5. Erzi Turk serve is flexible and changeable. The forehand preemption and receiving serve are active and threatening; the ability to hold each other is general, after continuous backhand rubbing control, Forehand attack consciousness is stronger than backhand, defense ability is poor.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G846

【相似文献】