我国体育人文社会科学成果评价指标体系构建研究

发布时间：2018-06-20 05:58

本文选题：体育人文社会科学 + 成果评价　；参考：《河南师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：体育人文社会科学是在体育领域研究人文现象和社会现象的一门综合学科,具有科学性与人文性相统一、应用性与理论性相统一的特点。相对于体育自然科学评价,我国体育人文社会科学评价要复杂得多,但由于缺乏自身的评价体系,自然科学的评价方法被简单地运用在体育人文社会科学成果评价中,以致产生了许多负面效应及社会问题。随着经济、社会的高速发展,如何构建科学、合理的体育人文社会科学研究成果的评价指标体系,已成为当前体育人文社会科学发展中亟待解决、刻不容缓的的重大理论和现实问题。本研究运用文献资料法、专家访谈法、特尔菲法、层次分析法以及逻辑分析法等科学的研究方法对体育人文社会科学成果评价指标体系进行构建。目前人文社会科学成果评价主要以创新性和价值性为侧重点,成果的规范性评价不足,所以本研究以此为切入点,加入学术规范性指标,并与价值性和创新性共同组成一级指标。经过3轮的专家问卷调查,综合分析专家提出的意见与建议,通过研究得出以下结论:(1)将体育人文社会科学成果分为论文类成果、著作类成果和研究报告类成果,分别建立指标体系,并采用定性评价与定量评价相结合、主观指标与客观指标相结合的评价方法。(2)客观指标体系中,学术价值权重设置最高。论文类成果和著作类成果在一级指标和权重的设置上一致,不同点在创新性指标下二级指标的设计和权重的设置上,研究报告类成果由于没有公开发表,无法进行定量评价。(3)主观指标体系中,创新性权重设置最高。论文类和著作类在指标设置上一致,不同点在一级指标权重设置上,由于著作类成果的结构和体系完备性更为重要,因此赋予学术规范性更高的权重;研究报告类成果的特点是追求社会效益,需要大量的数据支撑,因此主要从社会价值、创新性、研究难度和学术规范性4个方面进行评价。
[Abstract]:Sports humanities and social sciences is a comprehensive discipline in the field of sports, which has the characteristics of unity of science and humanism, application and theory. Compared with the evaluation of physical science, the evaluation of sports humanities and social sciences in our country is much more complicated. However, due to the lack of its own evaluation system, the evaluation method of natural science is simply applied to the evaluation of the achievements of sports humanities and social sciences. As a result, there are many negative effects and social problems. With the rapid development of economy and society, how to construct a scientific and reasonable evaluation index system of sports humanities and social science research results has become an urgent need to be solved in the development of sports humanities and social sciences. Urgent and important theoretical and practical problems. In this study, scientific research methods such as literature method, expert interview method, Delphi method, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and logical analysis method were used to construct the evaluation index system of sports humanities and social science achievements. At present, the evaluation of achievements in humanities and social sciences is mainly focused on innovation and value, and the normative evaluation of results is insufficient. And together with value and innovation constitute a primary index. After three rounds of expert questionnaire survey and comprehensive analysis of the opinions and suggestions put forward by the experts, the following conclusions are drawn through the study: 1) the achievements of sports humanities and social sciences are divided into three categories: papers, works and research reports. The index system is established respectively, and the evaluation method of combining qualitative evaluation with quantitative evaluation, subjective index and objective index is adopted. In the objective index system, the weight of academic value is the highest. The results of papers and books are consistent in the setting of primary indexes and weights. The differences are in the design of secondary indicators and the setting of weights under innovative indicators. The research report results have not been published publicly. In the subjective index system, the innovative weight setting is the highest. The paper class and the work class are consistent in the index setting, the difference is in the first class index weight setting, because the work class achievement structure and the system completeness is more important, therefore endows the academic normative higher weight; The research report is characterized by pursuing social benefits, which needs a large amount of data support, so it is mainly evaluated from four aspects: social value, innovation, research difficulty and academic standardization.
【学位授予单位】：河南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G812.6

【相似文献】