第31届里约奥运会中国男篮与前四强男篮快攻战术对比研究

发布时间：2018-08-08 11:37

【摘要】：随着现代篮球技战术的不断发展,篮球的进攻战术也在不断的发展,训练技术和手段的科学化也让运动员的身体条件在不断的突破极限,比赛中运动员的个人技战术和身体条件的发展也极大地提升了比赛的观赏性。在篮球比赛中,球队所采用的的进攻战术多种多样,但是随着篮球运动的不断发展和进步,快速攻防、高强对抗、以快制胜都是现代篮球进攻战术中不可缺少的内容。快攻战术是适应现代篮球高速度的发展特点,快攻的观赏性和时效性也能从侧面彰显出篮球运动的本质。同时,快攻战术也是比赛中球队落后情况下快速追分并提升本方球员士气以及在一定程度上打击防守气势的有效进攻战术,对快攻战术的运用也是衡量一支球队进攻能力的重要指标。本文运用文献资料法、问卷调查法、视频分析法、数理分析法等方法对2016年第31届里约奥运会男篮比赛中国男篮以及前四强男篮比赛中对快攻战术的运用情况进行了比较研究得出以下结果:1.第31届里约奥运会中国男篮在快攻的次数、直接得分以及直接得分占总得分百分比上相较美国男篮、塞尔维亚男篮、澳大利亚男篮都有明显的差距,其中美国男篮在快攻次数、快攻直接得分以及总得分方面在前四强中是最高的,在快攻的直接成功率上相较美国男篮、塞尔维亚男篮、西班牙男篮以及澳大利亚男篮都有明显的差距,其中塞尔维亚男篮是前四强球队中最高的。2.第31届里约奥运会中国男篮快攻发动方式以抢断球、盖帽发动为主,由于没有后场篮板球的保证,所以中国男篮在后场篮板球发动快攻方面比前四强的四支球队所占比例都要低。在快攻的发动人员上中国男篮以后卫队员发动为主,前四强球队快攻发动人员较为分散。中国男篮与前四强球队都是以无接应为主,有接应的情况下中国男篮以固定接应为主,前四强球队普遍采用的是机动接应。3.第31届里约奥运会中国男篮以个人突破推进为主,前四强四支球队都是以传运结合推进为主。中国男篮多以1-2人参与推进和无传球推进为主,推进过程中队员之间呼应不多配合也不过默契,推进速度不快。4.第31届里约奥运会中国男篮前四强队相比在结束方式上都是以接进篮筐的直接上篮和投篮为主的,在被犯规方面比例要高于四强的队伍,说明中国男篮还有有一定的冲击力的。但是在三分球结束方面由于中国男篮队中没有稳定的三分投射点,所以中国男篮在三分球结束方面明显不足于前四强球队。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of modern basketball techniques and tactics, basketball offensive tactics are also constantly developing. The scientific training techniques and means also make athletes' physical conditions constantly break through the limits. The development of individual skills and physical conditions also greatly improves the appreciation of the competition. In basketball games, the team adopts a variety of offensive tactics, but with the continuous development and progress of basketball, fast attack and defense, high-strength confrontation, to win quickly are the indispensable contents of modern basketball offensive tactics. Fast attack tactics adapt to the development characteristics of modern basketball with high speed. The appreciation and timeliness of fast attack can also reveal the essence of basketball from the side. At the same time, fast-break tactics are also effective offensive tactics that can quickly catch points and boost the morale of their players and to a certain extent attack the defensive momentum when the team falls behind. The use of fast-break tactics is also an important indicator of a team's offensive ability. This article uses the literature method, the questionnaire survey method, the video analysis method, This paper makes a comparative study on the use of fast break tactics in the men's basketball competition of the 31st Rio Olympic Games in 2016 and the top four men's basketball teams by means of mathematical analysis and other methods. The following results are obtained: 1. The number of fastbreak, direct scoring and the percentage of direct scoring in the total score of the Chinese men's basketball team at the 31st Rio Olympic Games are significantly different from those of the American men's basketball team, the Serbian men's basketball team and the Australian men's basketball team, among which the American men's basketball team is in the fast break number. The direct score of fast break and the total score are the highest in the top four. Compared with the American men's basketball, Serbian men's basketball, Spanish men's basketball and Australian men's basketball, the direct success rate of fast break is obviously lower than that of American men's basketball team, Serbian men's basketball team, Spanish men's basketball team and Australian men's basketball team. The Serbian men's basketball team is the highest in the top four. In the 31st Rio Olympic Games, the Chinese men's basketball team was launched in the form of steals and blocks, because there was no guarantee of backcourt rebounds. Therefore, the Chinese men's basketball in the backcourt rebounds launched fast break than the top four teams account for a lower proportion. The Chinese men's basketball team is mainly started by the defenders, while the top four teams are scattered. The Chinese men's basketball team and the top four teams are based on no support, and the Chinese men's basketball team is based on the fixed support under the condition of receiving, and the top four teams generally adopt the motor relay. 3. The 31 st Rio Olympic Games Chinese men's basketball team mainly by the individual breakthrough advancement, the first four top four teams are mainly by the transmission and transportation union advancement. China's men's basketball team to 1-2 people to participate in the propulsion and no pass to advance, the process of propulsion among the players do not respond to more cooperation is only tacit understanding, the speed of propulsion is not fast. 4. Compared with the top four teams of the Chinese men's basketball team in the 31st Rio Olympic Games, all the top four teams in the Chinese men's basketball team end up with direct layup and shooting, and the proportion of fouls is higher than that of the top four teams, which shows that the Chinese men's basketball team still has a certain impact. But at the end of the three-point, because the Chinese men's basketball team does not have the stable three-point projection point, the Chinese men's basketball team is obviously inferior to the top four teams in the end of the three-point ball.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G841

【相似文献】