运动员仲裁权益保障的困境及其修正——兼述里约奥运会仲裁案件

发布时间：2018-08-28 13:06

【摘要】：CAS一直以成为全球体育仲裁领域最高权威为发展目标,里约奥运会AHD共办理28起仲裁案件,裁决数量为历届奥运会之最。经济来源受限、组织结构受困,导致CAS生而不独立。排他性强制仲裁协议、任意适用先例的习惯、兴奋剂纠纷严格责任原则的适用,进一步损害运动员仲裁权益,违背"自然正义"。体育仲裁亦是自治的法律秩序,有必要通过重塑仲裁员选任程序,落实仲裁庭管辖权自裁原则,确立遵循先例规则,适用混合归责制度等尽可能保障运动员个体利益。同时,未来中国体育仲裁之制度设计有必要参考CAS常设仲裁庭和向重大体育赛事派驻临时仲裁庭的双元模式,在确保仲裁机构财政来源和组织结构公正独立的基础上予以程序构建。
[Abstract]:CAS has been the development goal of becoming the highest authority in the field of global sports arbitration. The AHD of Rio Olympic Games handled 28 arbitration cases, and the number of adjudication was the largest ever in the Olympic Games. Limited sources of economic resources, organizational structure difficulties, leading to CAS born and not independent. Exclusive compulsory arbitration agreement, the custom of arbitrary application of precedent, the application of strict liability principle of doping dispute, further damage athletes' arbitration rights and interests, and violate "natural justice". Sports arbitration is also an autonomous legal order. It is necessary to protect the individual interests of athletes as much as possible by reshaping the procedure of selecting arbitrators, implementing the principle of self-adjudication of the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, establishing precedent rules and applying the mixed imputation system. At the same time, it is necessary for the future design of China's sports arbitration system to refer to the dual model of the CAS permanent arbitration tribunal and the temporary arbitration tribunal assigned to major sports events. On the basis of ensuring the impartiality and independence of the financial source and organizational structure of the arbitration institution, the procedure is constructed.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“法治中国视阈下的司法与政治关系研究”(14BFX002)
【分类号】：G80-05

【相似文献】