第十八届CUBA男子八强球队在24强赛中攻防能力分析

发布时间：2018-10-10 08:02

【摘要】：第十八届CUBA首次由全国16强发展为全国24强赛,赛制由单败淘汰改为小组单循环,这一赛制的改变不仅增加了比赛场次,又提高了比赛的激烈程度,同时也对参赛队的竞技能力有了更高的要求。第十八届CUBA男子八强球队分别是:清华大学、太原理工大学、中国民航大学、中南大学、北京大学、山西大学、西安交通大学、广东工业大学。本文通过文献资料法、录像观察法、数理统计法,对比分析法对八支球队在24强赛中的数据统计对比分析,可以对本届CUBA的竞技水平有一个直观的认识和了解,以期达到为其他球队在今后的训练和比赛中提供借鉴与参考。通过分析,得出以下结论:1年龄及身体形态,清华大学队员在身高、体重等方面具有优势,尤其在中锋、前锋位置上的优势显著,成为他们夺冠的保证;北京大学球员托莱指数优于其他球队,在体格健壮,身体对抗方面占有优势,使技战术更好的发挥。太原理工大学、中国民航大学队员的年龄结构较为合理,比赛经验丰富,为他们取得亚军、季军创造了有利条件。其他球队在年龄及身体形态(身高、体重、克托莱指数)方面各有优劣,但差异不具有决定性。2进攻方面,清华大学前场篮板球、两分命中率突出;太原理工大学外线命中率最高,助攻、快攻多、得分能力好;中国民航大学整体实力均衡;中南大学偏好三分进攻,以外线为主;北京大学整体实力较突出,外线命中率低;山西大学,总投篮命中率低,快攻得分能力较强;西安交通大学快攻、助攻少,失误多,球队制造犯规能力比较突出;广东工业大学总投篮命中率较高,球队攻击性较弱。3防守方面,清华大学防守篮板好,盖帽、抢断不足;太原理工大学盖帽、抢断做的最突出;中国民航大学盖帽欠缺,防守犯规方面做的最好;中南大学抢断数值低;北京大学防守篮板、盖帽比较突出;山西大学抢断数值低,盖帽较好;西安交通大学防守犯规最多,防守篮板较好;广东工业大学抢断、盖帽较好。
[Abstract]:For the first time, the 18th CUBA has developed from the top 16 to the top 24 of the country. The competition system has changed from single defeat to single group circulation. The change of this system not only increases the number of matches, but also increases the intensity of the competition. At the same time, there are higher requirements for the competitive ability of the participating teams. The 18th CUBA men's top eight teams are: Tsinghua University, Taiyuan University of Technology, Civil Aviation University of China, Central South University, Peking University, Shanxi University, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Guangdong University of Technology. This article through the literature material method, the video observation method, the mathematical principle statistics method, the contrast analysis method to eight teams in the 24 finals data statistical comparison analysis, may have the intuitive understanding and the understanding to this CUBA competitive level, In order to achieve for other teams in the future training and competition to provide reference and reference. Through the analysis, we can draw the following conclusion: 1 age and body shape, Tsinghua University players have advantages in height and weight, especially in the position of center and forward, which become their guarantee of winning the championship. Peking University player Torre index is superior to other teams in physical fitness, physical confrontation advantage, so that the techniques and tactics to play better. The age structure of the members of Taiyuan University of Technology and the Civil Aviation University of China is reasonable and the competition experience is rich, which creates favorable conditions for them to win runner-up and runner-up. Other teams have their own advantages and disadvantages in age and body shape (height, weight, Ketole index), but the difference is not decisive 2. 2 offensive, Tsinghua University front court rebounds, two points hit rate is prominent; Taiyuan University of Science and Technology has the highest percentage of outside hit, assists, fast break and good scoring ability; China Civil Aviation University has a balance of overall strength; Central South University prefers three points of attack, mainly on outside lines; Peking University has more outstanding overall strength and low hit rate on exterior lines. Shanxi University, the total shooting percentage is low, fast break scoring ability is strong; Xi'an Jiaotong University has fewer assists, more errors, and the team has a more outstanding ability to make fouls; Guangdong University of Technology has a higher total shooting hit rate. In terms of offensive weakness of the team, Tsinghua University has good rebounds, blocks and steals; Taiyuan University of Science and Technology blocks the shots, the steals are the most prominent; the China Civil Aviation University is short of blocks, and the best defensive fouls are done; Central South University steals low; Peking University defensive rebounds, blocked shots more prominent; Shanxi University steals low, blocking better; Xi'an Jiaotong University defense fouls are the most, defensive rebounds better; Guangdong University of Technology steals, blocked shots better.
【学位授予单位】：太原理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G841

【相似文献】