当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 体育论文 >

2015-2016年CBA联赛总体主场效应技术指标判别分析

发布时间:2018-12-19 16:10
【摘要】:引用了三种标准对2015-2016CBA联赛主场效应进行了检验,并进一步在技术指标层面对主场效应进行了逐步判别分析,结果表明:(1)三种标准的检验结果一致表明:联赛总体具有明显的主场效应,但是这种主场效应在常规赛阶段非常明显,在季后赛阶段未能显现。(2)总体比赛主场效应主要体现在罚球次数FTA、助攻AST、失误TO、犯规F、盖帽BL和抢断STL等6项指标上,其判别作用依次减弱;常规赛的判别指标依次是罚中次数FT、助攻AST、失误TO、盖帽BL、犯规F和抢断STL;季后赛阶段因无主场效应特征而无法建立逐步判别函数。(3)胜场的主场效应主要体现在5项指标:助攻AST、失误TO、罚球次数FTA、盖帽BL和三分投中次数P3,其判别作用依次减弱;负场的主要依次体现在罚中次数FT、防守篮板DR、犯规F和三分命中率PP3等4项指标。
[Abstract]:In this paper, three kinds of criteria are cited to test the home effect of 2015-2016CBA league, and the home effect is analyzed step by step at the level of technical index. The results show that: (1) the test results of the three criteria show that the overall league has a significant home effect, but this kind of home effect is very obvious in the regular season. (2) the home effect of the overall game is mainly reflected in the number of free throws FTA, assists AST, error TO, foul F, blocked BL and steals STL and other six indicators, its discriminant effect weakened in turn; The judging indexes of regular season are the number of times in the penalty FT, assists AST, error TO, blocking BL, foul F and the steals STL;. In the playoff stage, it is impossible to establish a stepwise discriminant function because of the absence of home effect. (3) the home effect of the winning field is mainly reflected in five indexes: the number of assists AST, errors, TO, free throws, FTA, penalty shots, BL, and the number of 3-point shots, P3. Its discriminant effect was weakened in turn; The negative field is mainly reflected in the number of times in the penalty FT, defensive rebounding DR, foul F and 3-point hit rate PP3 and other four indicators.
【作者单位】: 北京航空航天大学体育部;广州体育学院研究生部;
【分类号】:G841


本文编号:2387154

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2387154.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户cffaa***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com